IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13567-d1237370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Decentralization and County Natural Poverty: A Multidimensional Study Based on a BP Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Wang

    (School of International Business, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Wanrong Deng

    (School of International Business, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

To achieve the goal of long-term stable poverty reduction, it is necessary to implement not only economic poverty reduction but also natural poverty reduction and formulate a green and sustainable economic growth pattern, and finance is an effective means to affect economic poverty reduction and natural poverty reduction. This paper innovatively calculates the natural poverty index of 1712 county administrative units in China based on BP neural network and combines relevant county data to investigate the impact of county fiscal decentralization on natural poverty and its transmission mechanism from 2000 to 2020 using a two-way fixed-effect model, which provides a new interpretation perspective for green economy patterns and sustainable development. The main research results are as follows: First, the increase in county-level financial autonomy in China significantly increases the level of regional natural poverty, which is still valid after a series of robustness tests using the instrumental variable method, replacing the response variables and processing with a one-stage lag. Secondly, heterogeneity analysis shows that, on the one hand, the positive impact of county-level fiscal decentralization on the natural poverty index is different in regions with different natural poverty formation mechanisms. On the other hand, the reform of “provincial direct management of counties” has significantly improved the natural poverty situation in counties, indicating that an extensive fiscal and taxation system in the early stages of economic development aggravates regional natural poverty and that optimized fiscal decentralization is conducive to the alleviation of natural poverty. Finally, the mechanism analysis found that the local income impact and expenditure preference accompanied by the fiscal decentralization of counties strengthened the race to the bottom of taxation, guided industrialization, hindered technological progress and led to the deterioration of regional natural poverty. This research claims that encouraging local governments to deepen and improve the fiscal decentralization system, implement the concept of green finance, improve the ecological protection compensation mechanism and market incentive system and implement differentiated mitigation plans for different natural poverty counties are the crucial factors to achieving natural poverty alleviation at the county level and improving regional ecological sustainability in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Wang & Wanrong Deng, 2023. "Fiscal Decentralization and County Natural Poverty: A Multidimensional Study Based on a BP Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13567-:d:1237370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hikaru Ogawa & David E. Wildasin, 2009. "Think Locally, Act Locally: Spillovers, Spillbacks, and Efficient Decentralized Policymaking," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1206-1217, September.
    2. Jonathan Rodden & Erik Wibbels, 2010. "Fiscal Decentralization And The Business Cycle: An Empirical Study Of Seven Federations," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 37-67, March.
    3. Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina V., 2000. "Incentives to provide local public goods: fiscal federalism, Russian style," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 337-368, June.
    4. Silva, Emilson C. D. & Caplan, Arthur J., 1997. "Transboundary Pollution Control in Federal Systems," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 173-186, October.
    5. Davoodi, Hamid & Zou, Heng-fu, 1998. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 244-257, March.
    6. Jack Mintz & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Commodity Tax Competition Between Member States of a Federation: Equilibrium and Efficiency," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 449-489, Springer.
    7. Fredriksson, Per G. & List, John A. & Millimet, Daniel L., 2003. "Bureaucratic corruption, environmental policy and inbound US FDI: theory and evidence," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(7-8), pages 1407-1430, August.
    8. Akai, Nobuo & Sakata, Masayo, 2002. "Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 93-108, July.
    9. Cavendish, William, 2000. "Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 1979-2003, November.
    10. Himayatullah Khan, 2008. "Poverty, environment and economic growth: exploring the links among three complex issues with specific focus on the Pakistan’s case," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(6), pages 913-929, December.
    11. Ulph, Alistair, 2000. "Harmonization and Optimal Environmental Policy in a Federal System with Asymmetric Information," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 224-241, March.
    12. Stoilova Desislava & Patonov Nikolay, 2012. "Fiscal Decentralization: Is It a Good Choice for the Small New Member States of the EU?," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 125-137, July.
    13. Zhang, Tao & Zou, Heng-fu, 1998. "Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 221-240, February.
    14. Weingast, Barry R., 2009. "Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 279-293, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhuoxi Yu & Yu Wu & Zhichuan Zhu, 2023. "Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Enikolopov, Ruben & Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, 2007. "Decentralization and political institutions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(11-12), pages 2261-2290, December.
    3. Bui, Duy Tung & Nguyen , Canh Phuc & Dinh , Thanh Su, 2021. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Externalities on Economic Growth: Spatial-provincial evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 46(4), pages 31-64, December.
    4. Tarkan Cavusoglu & Oguzhan Dincer, 2015. "Does decentralization reduce income inequality? Only in rich states," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 82(1), pages 285-306, July.
    5. Tarkan Cavusoglu & Oguzhan Dincer, 2015. "Does decentralization reduce income inequality? Only in rich states," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(1), pages 285-306, July.
    6. Floriana Cerniglia & Riccarda Longaretti, 2013. "Federalism, education-related public good and growth when agents are heterogeneous," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 271-301, July.
    7. Kayode Olaide & Beatrice D. Simo-Kengne & Josine Uwilingiye, 2022. "Sustainable Development–Fiscal Federalism Nexus: A “Beyond GDP” Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-37, May.
    8. Manh‐Tien Bui & Thai‐Ha Le & Donghyun Park, 2023. "Impacts of fiscal decentralization on local development in Vietnam: A disaggregated analysis," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 3-31, January.
    9. Choudhury, Atrayee & Sahu, Sohini, 2022. "Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and government size - The role of ethnic fragmentation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Alessio Mitra & Athanasios Chymis, 2022. "Federalism, but how? The impact of vertical fiscal imbalance on economic growth. Evidence from Belgium," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 322-350, July.
    11. Abd. Ghani, Judhiana & Grewal, Bhajan & Ahmed, Abdullahi D. & Mohamed Nor, Norashidah, 2019. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in Malaysia: A Market Preserving Federalism Perspective," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 53(1), pages 153-170.
    12. repec:wly:soecon:v:82:1:y:2015:p:285-306 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Liangliang Liu & Donghong Ding & Jun He, 2019. "The welfare effects of fiscal decentralization: a simple model and evidence from China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 417-434, January.
    14. Jianing Zang & Liangliang Liu, 2020. "Fiscal decentralization, government environmental preference, and regional environmental governance efficiency: evidence from China," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(2), pages 439-457, October.
    15. Yushkov, Andrey, 2015. "Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth: Theory, empirics, and the Russian experience," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 404-418.
    16. Michael Alexeev, 2016. "Fiscal Incentives in Federations: Russia and the US Compared," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 58(4), pages 485-506, December.
    17. Tristan Canare, 2021. "Decentralization and Development Outcomes: What Does the Empirical Literature Really Say?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 237(2), pages 111-151, June.
    18. Septimiu-Rares SZABO, 2017. "The Empirical Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization And Economic Growth: A Review Of Variables, Models And Results," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 47-66, June.
    19. Sanz Labrador, Ismael & Sanz-Sanz, José Félix, 2013. "Política fiscal y crecimiento económico: consideraciones microeconómicas y relaciones macroeconómicas," Macroeconomía del Desarrollo 5367, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    20. Suwandi Suwandi, 2015. "Fiscal Decentralization and Poverty in Papua Province," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 15-20.
    21. Hanes, Niklas, 2003. "Empirical Studies in Local Public Finance: Spillovers, Amalgamations, and Tactical Redistribution," Umeå Economic Studies 604, Umeå University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13567-:d:1237370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.