IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12301-d1215718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Impact of a Regional Integration Policy on Corporate Environmental Performance: Micro-Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang Zhang

    (Accounting School, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Xuhui Long

    (Accounting School, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Zongyi Zhang

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Chenyang Yu

    (Academy of Guangzhou Development, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Rong Huang

    (Accounting School, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

Abstract

Environmental performance is extremely vital for sustainable growth in China, and the impact of a regional integration policy plays an important role in improving environmental performance. However, current studies are weak in causal inference, and firm-level evidence is lacking. As a result, taking the Outline of the Pearl River Delta Reform and Development Plan as a quasi-natural experiment, with propensity score matching and difference-in-differences methods, this paper investigates the effect of regional integration on firms’ environmental performance. Our empirical results show that regional integration can significantly improve corporate environmental performance; specifically, the regional integration will result in an increase in the output value, of 46.7%, 22.3%, and 68.1% per unit emission of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), industrial wastewater (WATER), and industrial smoke and dust (SD). Moreover, the impact of regional integration differs across different industries. For SO 2 , the impact of regional integration is greater for the petroleum processing, coking and nuclear fuel processing industries, and special equipment manufacturing; in terms of WATER, the impact is much higher in the tobacco products industry and printing and the reproduction of recording media industry; for SD, the petroleum processing, coking, and nuclear fuel processing industries are highly impacted. Finally, this impact also differs for core and peripheral cities. For policy implications, first, regional integration policies are highly recommended, and China is implementing regional integration in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area and Yangtze River Delta, and these policies should be enhanced for other areas. Second, to maximize the effect of regional integration, the government needs to combine regional industrial structural characteristics to formulate industrial and environmental policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang Zhang & Xuhui Long & Zongyi Zhang & Chenyang Yu & Rong Huang, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of a Regional Integration Policy on Corporate Environmental Performance: Micro-Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12301-:d:1215718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Bliss, Mark A. & Gul, Ferdinand A., 2012. "Political connection and cost of debt: Some Malaysian evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1520-1527.
    3. Xiao, Gang & Shen, Sichen, 2022. "To pollute or not to pollute: Political connections and corporate environmental performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    5. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    6. Yu, Chenyang & Tan, Yuanfang & Zhou, Yu & Zang, Chuanxiang & Tu, Chenglin, 2022. "Can functional urban specialization improve industrial energy efficiency? Empirical evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    7. Benjamin Goldman & Thomas H. Klier & Thomas Walstrum, 2016. "Evidence on the Within-Industry Agglomeration of R&D, Production, and Administrative Occupations," Working Paper Series WP-2016-20, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    8. Zhang, Weike & Luo, Qian & Liu, Shiyuan, 2022. "Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 105-121.
    9. Awad, Atif, 2019. "Does economic integration damage or benefit the environment? Africa's experience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 991-999.
    10. Dong Feng & Jian Li & Xintao Li & Zaisheng Zhang, 2019. "The Effects of Urban Sprawl and Industrial Agglomeration on Environmental Efficiency: Evidence from the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Yan, Bin & Wang, Feng & Dong, Mingru & Ren, Jing & Liu, Juan & Shan, Jing, 2022. "How do financial spatial structure and economic agglomeration affect carbon emission intensity? Theory extension and evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budi Wahyono, 2023. "Do political connections affect the environmental performance of Sharia-compliant and non-Sharia-compliant firms? Evidence from Indonesia's PROPER program," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(4), pages 1771-1779.
    2. Moaniba, Igam M. & Su, Hsin-Ning & Lee, Pei-Chun, 2019. "On the drivers of innovation: Does the co-evolution of technological diversification and international collaboration matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Ge, Shuang & Liu, Xielin, 2022. "The role of knowledge creation, absorption and acquisition in determining national competitive advantage," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Bo-Xiang Hsu & Yi-Min Chen, 2019. "Industrial policy, social capital, human capital, and firm-level competitive advantage," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 883-903, September.
    5. Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Lawton, Thomas C., 2020. "Information and nonmarket strategy: Conceptualizing the interrelationship between big data and corporate political activity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Junjun Niu & Chunmei Mao, 2023. "The Policy Evolution Characteristics of Regional Integration Development in the Yangtze River Delta: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Policy Texts from 2003 to 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Yang, Yang & Mao, Zhenxing, 2020. "Location advantages of lodging properties: A comparison between hotels and Airbnb units in an urban environment," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Asa Romeo Asa & Harold Campbell & Johanna Pangeiko Nautwima, 2022. "A Critical Review of Organizing Knowledge Management for Innovation," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 7-15, January.
    9. Zhang, Rongwu & Fu, Wenqiang & Lu, Tong, 2023. "Capital market opening and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Nattarinee Denlertchaikul & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Piyachart Phiromswad, 2022. "The Interaction Effect of Text-Based Corporate Innovation and Economic Policy Uncertainty on Firm Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    11. Lei Zheng & Akira Omori & Jin Cao & Xuemeng Guo, 2023. "Environmental Regulation and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from Chinese Carbon Emission Trading Pilot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Shuman Zhang & Changhong Yuan & Chen Han, 2020. "Industry–university–research alliance portfolio size and firm performance: the contingent role of political connections," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1505-1534, October.
    13. Fernando Cárdenas Echeverri & Andres García-Suaza & Juan Esteban Garzon Restrepo, 2023. "Revisiting the relationship between firm strategic capabilities and productivity in a multilevel analysis: Do labor market conditions matter?," Documentos de Trabajo 20641, Universidad del Rosario.
    14. Yugank Goyal & Klaus Heine, 2021. "Why do informal markets remain informal: the role of tacit knowledge in an Indian footwear cluster," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 639-659, April.
    15. Luminita Enache & Anup Srivastava, 2018. "Should Intangible Investments Be Reported Separately or Commingled with Operating Expenses? New Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3446-3468, July.
    16. Rao, B. Bhaskara, 2010. "Estimates of the steady state growth rates for selected Asian countries with an extended Solow model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 46-53, January.
    17. Beatrix Paal & Bruce D. Smith, 2013. "The sub-optimality of the Friedman rule and the optimum quantity of money," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 14(2), pages 911-948, November.
    18. Prof. Dr. Adem KALCA & Resc. Assist. Atakan DURMAZ, 2012. "Diaspora As The Instrument Of Humane Capital," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(5), pages 94-104, October.
    19. Jung-Suk Yu & M. Kabir Hassan & Abdullah Mamun & Abul Hassan, 2014. "Financial Sectors Reform and Economic Growth in Morocco: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 13(1), pages 69-102, April.
    20. repec:zbw:rwidps:0030 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Marina Dabić & Jane Maley & Leo-Paul Dana & Ivan Novak & Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Andrea Caputo, 2020. "Pathways of SME internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 705-725, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12301-:d:1215718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.