IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11920-d1209414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Online Communities Affect Online Community Engagement and Word-of-Mouth Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Al-Khasawneh

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11931, Jordan)

  • Shafig Al-Haddad

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11931, Jordan)

  • Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati

    (Business Faculty, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan)

  • Hebatallah Hisham Al Khalili

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11931, Jordan)

  • Lana Laith Azar

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11931, Jordan)

  • Farah Waleed Ghabayen

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11931, Jordan)

  • Leen Mazen Jaber

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11931, Jordan)

  • Mariam Husam Ali

    (King Talal School of Business Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11931, Jordan)

  • Ra’ed Masa’deh

    (Business School, University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the impact of online communities on online community engagement and word-of-mouth intention. The current research model was extended and developed into a theoretical model that conceptualizes the relationship between the main concepts to study the influence of utilitarian value, hedonic value, entitativity value, social presence, social support, and community identification on online community engagement, which will therefore affect word-of-mouth intention. Therefore, based on the collected survey questionnaire of 338 responses in Jordan, the results were analyzed using Amos 22. EFA is used to test reliability and validity, analyze the validation of the convergent model and the discriminant validity and analyze the data description. Moreover, this study applied Path Analysis, which was used to check the hypotheses of the studies that were previously developed by researchers. The findings of the seven hypotheses that were conducted to test the research hypotheses indicate that entitativity value, social support, social presence, community identification, and word-of-mouth intention significantly influence online community engagement. However, the utilitarian value and the hedonic value did not influence online community engagement significantly. In addition, the results represent various findings that hold essential implications and accordingly, recommendations are suggested for future marketing research and practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Al-Khasawneh & Shafig Al-Haddad & Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati & Hebatallah Hisham Al Khalili & Lana Laith Azar & Farah Waleed Ghabayen & Leen Mazen Jaber & Mariam Husam Ali & Ra’ed Masa’deh, 2023. "How Online Communities Affect Online Community Engagement and Word-of-Mouth Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11920-:d:1209414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11920/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11920/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Jooa Julia & Gino, Francesca, 2015. "Poker-faced morality: Concealing emotions leads to utilitarian decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 49-64.
    2. Cees van der Eijk & Jonathan Rose, 2015. "Risky Business: Factor Analysis of Survey Data – Assessing the Probability of Incorrect Dimensionalisation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-31, March.
    3. O’Cass, Aron & Carlson, Jamie, 2012. "An e-retailing assessment of perceived website-service innovativeness: Implications for website quality evaluations, trust, loyalty and word of mouth," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 28-36.
    4. Mei-Hui Chen & Kune-Muh Tsai, 2020. "An Empirical Study of Brand Fan Page Engagement Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Elvira Ismagilova & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Emma Slade & Michael D. Williams, 2017. "Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM)," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context, chapter 0, pages 17-30, Springer.
    6. Hollebeek, Linda D. & Glynn, Mark S. & Brodie, Roderick J., 2014. "Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 149-165.
    7. Soumya Ray & Sung S. Kim & James G. Morris, 2014. "The Central Role of Engagement in Online Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 528-546, September.
    8. Regina Burnasheva & Yong Gu Suh & Katherine Villalobos-Moron, 2019. "Sense of community and social identity effect on brand love: Based on the online communities of a luxury fashion brands," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 50-65, January.
    9. Hua Pang & Jingying Wang & Xiang Hu, 2021. "Understanding the Potential Influence of WeChat Engagement on Bonding Capital, Bridging Capital, and Electronic Word-of-Mouth Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati, 2018. "Effect of corporate social responsibility on Jordan pharmaceutical industry’s business performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 566-583, August.
    11. Elvira Ismagilova & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Emma Slade & Michael D. Williams, 2017. "Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-319-52459-7, October.
    12. Nick Hajli & Xiaolin Lin, 2016. "Exploring the Security of Information Sharing on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Perceived Control of Information," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 111-123, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Rana, Nripendra P. & Prakasam, Naveena & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2019. "The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 222-235.
    2. Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor & Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Pushp Patil & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Sridhar Nerur, 2018. "Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 531-558, June.
    3. Liu, Linlin & Lee, Matthew K.O. & Liu, Renjing & Chen, Jiawen, 2018. "Trust transfer in social media brand communities: The role of consumer engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Irina Kalabikhina & Vadim Moshkin & Anton Kolotusha & Maksim Kashin & German Klimenko & Zarina Kazbekova, 2024. "Advancing Semantic Classification: A Comprehensive Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Analyzing Russian-Language Patient Reviews," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Marjeta Marolt & Hans-Dieter Zimmermann & Andreja Pucihar, 2020. "Enhancing Marketing Performance Through Enterprise-Initiated Customer Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Keke Bai & Farid Ullah & Muhammad Arif & Sahar Erfanian & Saima Urooge, 2023. "Stakeholder-Centered Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainable Development: Evidence from CSR Practices in the Top Companies by Market Capitalization at Shanghai Stock Exchange of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Taylor, Alex & Carlson, Jamie & Liao, Yi-Chuan & Rahman, Mohammad M., 2023. "Customer engagement and sharing behaviors: Toward a contingent curvilinear perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Krishen, Anjala S. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Bindu, N. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2021. "A broad overview of interactive digital marketing: A bibliometric network analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 183-195.
    9. Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Robin Nunkoo & Vishnupriya Raghavan & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Indian Travellers’ Adoption of Airbnb Platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 77-96, February.
    10. Ismagilova, Elvira & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Slade, Emma, 2020. "Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    11. Shafig Al-Haddad & Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati & Mohammad Al-Khasawneh & Rand Maraqa & Raya Hashem, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Consumer Engagement via Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Mosteller, Jill & Poddar, Amit, 2017. "To Share and Protect: Using Regulatory Focus Theory to Examine the Privacy Paradox of Consumers' Social Media Engagement and Online Privacy Protection Behaviors," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 27-38.
    13. Verma, Deepak & Prakash Dewani, Prem & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Dwivedi, Yogesh & Del Giudice, Manilo, 2023. "A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of eWOM credibility: Investigation of moderating role of culture and platform type," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Yunwei Cai & Byung-Ryul Bae, 2023. "Antecedents of Engagement within Online Sharing Economy Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Pradeep Kumar Roy & Zishan Ahmad & Jyoti Prakash Singh & Mohammad Abdallah Ali Alryalat & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2018. "Finding and Ranking High-Quality Answers in Community Question Answering Sites," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 53-68, March.
    16. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru & Ilavarasan, P. Vigneswara & Baabdullah, Abdullah M., 2020. "Up the ante: Electronic word of mouth and its effects on firm reputation and performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Roy, Pradeep K. & Singh, Jyoti P. & Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Kizgin, Hatice & Rana, Nripendra P., 2018. "Identifying reputation collectors in community question answering (CQA) sites: Exploring the dark side of social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 25-35.
    18. Muddassar Sarfraz & Ilhan Ozturk & Sunghoon Yoo & Muhammad Ali Raza & Heesup Han, 2023. "Toward a new understanding of environmental and financial performance through corporate social responsibility, green innovation, and sustainable development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati & Shafig Al-Haddad & Razan Abu Naba & Diana Hijazat & Ali Abdallah Alalwan & Ra’ed Masa’deh, 2023. "How Consumers’ Consciousness Moderates the Corporate Social Responsibility Effect on Apparel Industry Brand Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Katsifaraki, Georgia D. & Theodosiou, Marios, 2020. "How different (dis)engagement behaviors affect performance within an e-market ecosystem: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 578-591.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11920-:d:1209414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.