IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10012-d1178347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of the Collaborative Environmental Governance Network in Guizhou Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhanjie Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
    Institute of Gui-An New District, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Yongfeng Ma

    (School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Shasha Wang

    (Graduate School, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Chaoliang Luo

    (School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
    Institute of Gui-An New District, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Yongjian Wang

    (Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

China has successively set goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, aiming to transform to a green and low-carbon economy. Collaborative environmental governance (CEG) is an important way to achieve this transformation. To improve collaborative environmental governance, the study of the evolution of the collaborative environmental governance network (CEGN) is necessary. In this study, the CEGNs in different periods in Guizhou Province, China are established based on social network analysis. Then, the evolution of environment governance policy implementers’ functions in the network is investigated by two-dimensional (breadth and intensity) matrices. Moreover, the evolution of core implementers’ functions and its impacts on the operation of the network are analyzed based on the network stability. The results show that the network size, frequency of collaboration, and cohesion have gradually increased, and the network structure has changed from a loose pattern to an expanded and balanced system. Implementers such as the governments of municipalities (prefectures) (MGs) and counties (districts) (CGs), urban management committee (UMCs), and municipal (prefecture) ecological environment bureaus (MBEEs) have played leading and coordinating roles at different phases. However, the cohesion of the network is low, indicating a low level of collaboration. This study integrates the collaborative governance theory and social network analysis, which provides a new way for the study of CEG. In addition, the CEG effect is evaluated by analyzing the evolution of the CEGN, which provides a reference for the CEG policy making in developing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhanjie Wang & Yongfeng Ma & Shasha Wang & Chaoliang Luo & Yongjian Wang, 2023. "The Evolution of the Collaborative Environmental Governance Network in Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10012-:d:1178347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10012/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10012/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoquan Gao & Cuiping Liao & Xiaoling Qi & Yulong Zhang, 2023. "A Scenario Simulation of Material Substitution in the Cement Industry under the Carbon Neutral Strategy: A Case Study of Guangdong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Carattini, Stefano & Fankhauser, Sam & Gao, Jianjian & Gennaioli, Caterina & Panzarasa, Pietro, 2023. "What does network analysis teach us about international environmental cooperation?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. J. Leah Jones & Dave D. White, 2021. "A social network analysis of collaborative governance for the food-energy-water nexus in Phoenix, AZ, USA," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 671-681, December.
    4. Yaqun Yi & Yi Liu & Hong He & Yuan Li, 2012. "Environment, governance, controls, and radical innovation during institutional transitions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 689-708, September.
    5. Sarker, Pradip Kumar & Rahman, Md Saifur & Giessen, Lukas, 2018. "Regional governance by the South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (SACEP)? Institutional design and customizable regime policy offering flexible political options," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 454-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiangyang Lin & Yuanhong Tian & Qian Yao & Yong Shi, 2023. "Structural Characteristics of Intergovernmental Water Pollution Control Cooperation Networks Using Social Network Analysis and GIS in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sobratee-Fajurally, N. & Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe, 2022. "Inclusive sustainable landscape management in West and Central Africa: enabling co-designing contexts for systemic sensibility," IWMI Books, Reports H051652, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Hameeda A. AlMalki & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2023. "Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 731-785, June.
    3. Yina Mao & Chi-Sum Wong & Kelly Peng, 2013. "Breaking institutionalized corruption: Is the experience of the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption generalizable?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1115-1124, December.
    4. Gao, Yu & Gao, Shanxing & Zhou, Yunyue & Huang, Kuo-Feng, 2015. "Picturing firms' institutional capital-based radical innovation under China's institutional voids," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1166-1175.
    5. Liu, Baohua & Zhou, Wei & Chan, Kam C. & Chen, Yining, 2020. "Corporate executives with financial backgrounds: The crowding-out effect on innovation investment and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 161-173.
    6. Huang, Dan & Liu, Baohua & Chan, Kam C. & Chen, Yining, 2023. "Intended and unintended effects of mandatory R&D disclosure on innovation outcomes," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Gao, Yu & Yang, Zhuoer & Huang, Kuo-Feng & Gao, Shanxing & Yang, Wei, 2018. "Addressing the cross-boundary missing link between corporate political activities and firm competencies: The mediating role of institutional capital," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 259-268.
    8. Yuan Li & Haowen Chen & Yi Liu & Mike Peng, 2014. "Managerial ties, organizational learning, and opportunity capture: A social capital perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 271-291, March.
    9. Kailu Guo & Shixiang Li & Zhanqi Wang & Jianru Shi & Jun Bai & Jinhua Cheng, 2021. "Impact of Regional Green Development Strategy on Environmental Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Shen, Ching-Cheng & Yeh, Chien-Chi & Lin, Chun-Nan, 2022. "Using the perspective of business information technology technicians to explore how information technology affects business competitive advantage," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Pradip Kumar Sarker & Md Saifur Rahman & Lukas Giessen, 2019. "Regional economic regimes and the environment: stronger institutional design is weakening environmental policy capacity of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 19-52, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10012-:d:1178347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.