IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9818-d1175115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Gasification Performance of Low-Quality Lignite with Woody Wastes Using Greenhouse Gas CO 2 —A TG–MS Study

Author

Listed:
  • Despina Vamvuka

    (School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece)

  • George Tsagris

    (School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece)

  • Christia Loulashi

    (School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece)

Abstract

The carbon dioxide gasification performance of low-quality lignite-agroindustrial/forest waste blends was investigated in terms of reactivity, conversion, cold gas efficiency, product gas composition and heating value. The experiments were conducted in a fixed bed unit and a thermal analysis mass spectrometer system. Raw materials, chars, liquids and gases were quantitatively analyzed and their energy content was determined. Synergetic effects and the role of minerals were examined, the latter through chemical and fusibility analyses of the ashes. Ahlada lignite (AL) was of low quality, with a calorific value of 8.9 MJ/kg. The biomass materials, ginning cotton waste (GCW) and pine needles (PN) had calorific values 16.6 MJ/kg and 20.1 MJ/kg, respectively. The slagging/fouling propensity of AL ash was low, whereas that of biomass wastes was medium to high. Thermal treatment of the samples and their blends prior to gasification produced upgraded fuels. A Boudourd reaction occurred above 750 °C. Gasification reactivity followed the order: GCW > PN > AL. AL/PN mixtures presented additivity effects; however, AL/GCW mixtures presented synergy effects. When the lignite was blended with the biochars studied, its conversion increased from 90% to 94.5% and its cold gas efficiency from 31.8% to 35%. Generated gas attained a heating value of about 12 MJ/m 3 .

Suggested Citation

  • Despina Vamvuka & George Tsagris & Christia Loulashi, 2023. "Co-Gasification Performance of Low-Quality Lignite with Woody Wastes Using Greenhouse Gas CO 2 —A TG–MS Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9818-:d:1175115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9818/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9818/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diao, Rui & Li, Shanshan & Deng, Jingjing & Zhu, Xifeng, 2021. "Interaction and kinetic analysis of co-gasification of bituminous coal with walnut shell under CO2 atmosphere: Effect of inorganics and carbon structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 177-187.
    2. Lahijani, Pooya & Zainal, Zainal Alimuddin & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2015. "Conversion of the greenhouse gas CO2 to the fuel gas CO via the Boudouard reaction: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 615-632.
    3. Kim, Kwang Ho & Kim, Tae-Seung & Lee, Soo-Min & Choi, Donha & Yeo, Hwanmyeong & Choi, In-Gyu & Choi, Joon Weon, 2013. "Comparison of physicochemical features of biooils and biochars produced from various woody biomasses by fast pyrolysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 188-195.
    4. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Lim, C. Jim & Ellis, Naoko, 2015. "From fossil fuels towards renewables: Inhibitory and catalytic effects on carbon thermochemical conversion during co-gasification of biomass with fossil fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 196-209.
    5. Guizani, Chamseddine & Haddad, Khouloud & Jeguirim, Mejdi & Colin, Baptiste & Limousy, Lionel, 2016. "Combustion characteristics and kinetics of torrefied olive pomace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 453-463.
    6. Paweł Ziółkowski & Paweł Madejski & Milad Amiri & Tomasz Kuś & Kamil Stasiak & Navaneethan Subramanian & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Janusz Badur & Łukasz Niedźwiecki & Dariusz Mikielewicz, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Negative CO 2 Emission Power Plant Using Aspen Plus, Aspen Hysys, and Ebsilon Software," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Wu, Hao & Xiao, Jie & Zeng, Xiaoyuan & Li, Xue & Yang, Jing & Zou, Yuling & Liu, Sudongfang & Dong, Peng & Zhang, Yingjie & Liu, Jiang, 2019. "A high performance direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell – A green pathway for brown coal utilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 679-687.
    8. Prasertcharoensuk, Phuet & Bull, Steve J. & Phan, Anh N., 2019. "Gasification of waste biomass for hydrogen production: Effects of pyrolysis parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 112-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vamvuka, Despina & Afthentopoulos, Evaggelos & Sfakiotakis, Stelios, 2022. "H2-rich gas production from steam gasification of a winery waste and its blends with industrial wastes. Effect of operating parameters on gas quality and efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1224-1232.
    2. Małgorzata Wzorek & Robert Junga & Ersel Yilmaz & Bohdan Bozhenko, 2021. "Thermal Decomposition of Olive-Mill Byproducts: A TG-FTIR Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Li, Shenghui & Sun, Xiaojing & Liu, Linlin & Du, Jian, 2023. "A full process optimization of methanol production integrated with co-generation based on the co-gasification of biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    4. Sun, Minmin & Zhang, Jianliang & Li, Kejiang & Barati, Mansoor & Liu, Zhibin, 2022. "Co-gasification characteristics of coke blended with hydro-char and pyro-char from bamboo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Kluska, Jacek & Turzyński, Tomasz & Ochnio, Mateusz & Kardaś, Dariusz, 2020. "Characteristics of ash formation in the process of combustion of pelletised leather tannery waste and hardwood pellets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1246-1253.
    6. Sérgio Castro Pereira & M. Filipa Ribeiro & Nuno Batalha & Marcelo Maciel Pereira, 2017. "Catalyst regeneration using CO 2 as reactant through reverse‐Boudouard reaction with coke," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(5), pages 843-851, October.
    7. Jakub Frankowski & Wojciech Czekała, 2023. "Agricultural Plant Residues as Potential Co-Substrates for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Lim, C. Jim & Ellis, Naoko & Li, Yong Hua & Watkinson, A. Paul, 2015. "From coal towards renewables: Catalytic/synergistic effects during steam co-gasification of switchgrass and coal in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 918-930.
    9. Al Afif, Rafat & Linke, Bernd, 2019. "Biogas production from three-phase olive mill solid waste in lab-scale continuously stirred tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1046-1052.
    10. Lin, Chiou-Liang & Chou, Jing-Dong & Iu, Chi-Hou, 2020. "Effects of second-stage bed materials on hydrogen production in the syngas of a two-stage gasification process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 903-912.
    11. Hu, Qiang & Yang, Haiping & Wu, Zhiqiang & Lim, C. Jim & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Chen, Hanping, 2019. "Experimental and modeling study of potassium catalyzed gasification of woody char pellet with CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 678-688.
    12. Ahmed M. Salem & Harnek S. Dhami & Manosh C. Paul, 2022. "Syngas Production and Combined Heat and Power from Scottish Agricultural Waste Gasification—A Computational Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Biomass upgrading to high-value chemicals via gasification and electrolysis: A thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1367-1379.
    14. Šuhaj, Patrik & Husár, Jakub & Haydary, Juma & Annus, Július, 2022. "Experimental verification of a pilot pyrolysis/split product gasification (PSPG) unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    15. Cerciello, Francesca & Coppola, Antonio & Lacovig, Paolo & Senneca, Osvalda & Salatino, Piero, 2021. "Characterization of surface-oxides on char under periodically changing oxidation/desorption conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Yong, Qingqing & Jin, Kaiyuan & Li, Xiaobo & Yang, Ronggui, 2023. "Thermo-economic analysis for a novel grid-scale pumped thermal electricity storage system coupled with a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Mariyam, Sabah & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish. R & McKay, Gordon, 2022. "A critical review on co-gasification and co-pyrolysis for gas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Vishwajeet & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Marcin Baranowski & Michał Czerep & Artur Chorążyczewski & Krystian Krochmalny & Michał Ostrycharczyk & Paweł Ziółkowski & Paweł Madejski & Tadeusz Mączka & Amit A, 2022. "Entrained Flow Plasma Gasification of Sewage Sludge–Proof-of-Concept and Fate of Inorganics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Wei, Juntao & Gong, Yan & Guo, Qinghua & Chen, Xueli & Ding, Lu & Yu, Guangsuo, 2019. "A mechanism investigation of synergy behaviour variations during blended char co-gasification of biomass and different rank coals," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 597-605.
    20. Andrius Tamošiūnas & Ajmia Chouchène & Pranas Valatkevičius & Dovilė Gimžauskaitė & Mindaugas Aikas & Rolandas Uscila & Makrem Ghorbel & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2017. "The Potential of Thermal Plasma Gasification of Olive Pomace Charcoal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9818-:d:1175115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.