IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9296-d1166839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Discrepancy between Projected and Perceived Destination Images: A Cross-Cultural and Sustainable Analysis Using LDA Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuying Chen

    (School of Cultural Industries and Tourism, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

  • Shangyue Xu

    (College of Art and Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43201, USA)

  • Ronghui Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

  • Qingquan Jiang

    (School of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

Abstract

The projected image, created by destination marketing organizations, and the perceived image, formed by tourists’ perceptions, are crucial factors in destination selection. In this paper, machine learning models are used to construct projected image dimensions and perceptual dimensions for Chinese and English to analyze the similarities and differences between projected and perceptual images and their Chinese sustainability and cultural differences issues. We take Xiamen, a seaside tourist city in China, as an example, and analyze it by collecting 110,098 official promotional texts (both in Chinese and English) and tourist online review feedback as data sources using a latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model of natural language processing. The findings show that (1) the official projected image focuses on the overall image of the destination, while the tourists’ perceived image focuses on the specific image. (2) The official projected image covers the whole area of tourism, while the tourists’ perceived image focuses on Xiamen’s well-known attractions. The results of the above two points are the same for both the Chinese and English Topic models. (3) The official projected image focuses on three dimensions of destination: sustainability-economic, socio-cultural and environmental, while the tourist perception is more in the socio-cultural and environmental dimensions. (4) Both the projected and perceived images in Chinese and English differ in cross-cultural situations. The perceived images of Chinese and British tourists are influenced by their respective cultural backgrounds. Chinese tourists’ perceptions reflect cultural values associated with collectivism, long-term orientation, and uncertainty avoidance. On the other hand, British tourists’ perceptions align with cultural values of individualism, short-term orientation, and lower uncertainty avoidance. These differences can be explained using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory. The research in this paper can provide a reference for the promotion of tourism cities, and tourism destination organizations should not only focus on sustainable promotion, but also attract domestic and foreign tourists through differentiated promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuying Chen & Shangyue Xu & Ronghui Liu & Qingquan Jiang, 2023. "Exploring the Discrepancy between Projected and Perceived Destination Images: A Cross-Cultural and Sustainable Analysis Using LDA Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-31, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9296-:d:1166839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jian-Wu Bi & Yang Liu & Zhi-Ping Fan & Erik Cambria, 2019. "Modelling customer satisfaction from online reviews using ensemble neural network and effect-based Kano model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(22), pages 7068-7088, November.
    2. Patrick Legoherel & Bruno Daucé & Cathy Hsu & Ashok Ranchhold, 2009. "Culture, Time Orientation, and Exploratory Buying Behavior," Post-Print hal-01661183, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Nasiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Shokouhyar, Sajjad, 2021. "Actual consumers' response to purchase refurbished smartphones: Exploring perceived value from product reviews in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Maria Rostasova & Anna Padourova & Tatiana Corejova, 2020. "KANO model as a tool of effective customer satisfaction diagnostics of postal services," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 811-828, December.
    4. Zhang, Dianfeng & Shen, Zifan & Li, Yanlai, 2023. "Requirement analysis and service optimization of multiple category fresh products in online retailing using importance-Kano analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Heliani Berlato & Karen Florencio Corrêa, 2017. "A Reformulation of the Dual Career Conceptual Model for Analysis in an Organizational Scope: Revealing new Aspects," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(2), pages 225-246, March.
    6. Ming-Tsang Lu & Hsi-Peng Lu & Chiao-Shan Chen, 2022. "Exploring the Key Priority Development Projects of Smart Transportation for Sustainability: Using Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Lionel Nicod & Élodie Mallor & Sylvie Llosa, 2023. "L’influence de l’aide à participer en magasin sur la satisfaction client : une approche par le modèle tétraclasse," Post-Print hal-04311121, HAL.
    8. Wen-Kuo Chen & Dalianus Riantama & Long-Sheng Chen, 2020. "Using a Text Mining Approach to Hear Voices of Customers from Social Media toward the Fast-Food Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Junegak Joung & Ki-Hun Kim & Kwangsoo Kim, 2021. "Data-Driven Approach to Dual Service Failure Monitoring From Negative Online Reviews: Managerial Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    10. Yuan Yuan & Tianhui You & Tian’ai Xu & Xun Yu, 2022. "Customer-Oriented Strategic Planning for Hotel Competitiveness Improvement Based on Online Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-30, November.
    11. Dequn Shi & Takkee Hui, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Couchsurfing: A Comparative Study on Hosting Motives and Behaviors between the USA and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Yanlai Li & Zifan Shen & Cuiming Zhao & Kwai-Sang Chin & Xuwei Lang, 2024. "Understanding Customer Opinion Change on Fresh Food E-Commerce Products and Services—Comparative Analysis before and during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Zibarzani, Masoumeh & Abumalloh, Rabab Ali & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Samad, Sarminah & Alghamdi, O.A. & Nayer, Fatima Khan & Ismail, Muhammed Yousoof & Mohd, Saidatulakmal & Mohammed Akib, Noor Adelyna, 2022. "Customer satisfaction with Restaurants Service Quality during COVID-19 outbreak: A two-stage methodology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Messner, Wolfgang, 2023. "The contingency impact of culture on health security capacities for pandemic preparedness: A moderated Bayesian inference analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    15. Badgaiyan, Anant Jyoti & Verma, Anshul, 2014. "Intrinsic factors affecting impulsive buying behaviour—Evidence from India," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 537-549.
    16. Jia-Li Chang & Hui Li & Jian Wu, 2023. "How Tourist Group Books Hotels Meeting the Majority Affective Expectations: A Group Selection Frame with Kansei Text Mining and Consensus Coordinating," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 327-358, April.
    17. Janka Kopaničová & Dana Vokounová, 2023. "Cultural Differences in Coping with Changes in the External Environment: A Case of Behavioural Segmentation of Senior Consumers Based on Their Reaction to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(3), pages 21-46.
    18. Roy, Rajat & Naidoo, Vik, 2021. "The role of implicit lay belief, SEC attributes and temporal orientation in consumer decision making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 411-422.
    19. Pingping Cao & Jin Zheng & Mingyang Li, 2023. "Product Selection Considering Multiple Consumers’ Expectations and Online Reviews: A Method Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Sets and TODIM," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Zihayat, Morteza & Ayanso, Anteneh & Davoudi, Heidar & Kargar, Mehdi & Mengesha, Nigussie, 2021. "Leveraging non-respondent data in customer satisfaction modeling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 112-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9296-:d:1166839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.