IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9319-d875540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Key Priority Development Projects of Smart Transportation for Sustainability: Using Kano Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ming-Tsang Lu

    (Department of Information Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Hsi-Peng Lu

    (Department of Information Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Chiao-Shan Chen

    (Department of Information Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

Many smart transport programs are being carried out despite the fact that new smart transport programs technologies are not yet mature and people’s needs are not fully understood. As a result, many smart transport projects fall into chaos and fail to operate successfully, and can even impede socioeconomic development for sustainability. Therefore, this study suggests that cities should consider first the perceptions of people toward smart transport before they actively implement smart transport projects; this is an indispensable, key step to the smooth development of smart transport. Based on exploratory research, the study explores the procedure of constructing a kano model of smart transportation. A six-stage procedure is developed as primary collected 50 smart transport cases worldwide and then extracted 24 smart transport items. We designed questionnaire contents within the theoretical framework of the kano model, and eventually collected 369 completed questionnaires to determine how smart transport items can be classified under appropriate need attributes. Additionally, we use the customer satisfaction coefficient method to further prioritize the smart transport items, and four methods to prioritize them. Decision-makers can consider prioritization results from using different rules and methods, and reduce the gap between technologies implementation and actual needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming-Tsang Lu & Hsi-Peng Lu & Chiao-Shan Chen, 2022. "Exploring the Key Priority Development Projects of Smart Transportation for Sustainability: Using Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9319-:d:875540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bu, Kyunghee & Park, Seong Yong, 2016. "Are consumers in collectivist culture mostly indifferent to sports lesson programs?: A DAQ simulation on the Kano fuzzy model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1656-1660.
    2. Chung, Sai-Ho, 2021. "Applications of smart technologies in logistics and transport: A review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Jian-Wu Bi & Yang Liu & Zhi-Ping Fan & Erik Cambria, 2019. "Modelling customer satisfaction from online reviews using ensemble neural network and effect-based Kano model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(22), pages 7068-7088, November.
    4. H. C. Yadav & Rajeev Jain & A. R. Singh & P. K. Mishra, 2017. "Kano integrated robust design approach for aesthetical product design: a case study of a car profile," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1709-1727, October.
    5. Li-Fei Chen & Szu-Chi Chen & Chao-Ton Su, 2018. "An innovative service quality evaluation and improvement model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3-4), pages 228-249, March.
    6. Dianfeng Zhang & Yanlai Li & Yiqun Li & Zifan Shen, 2022. "Service Failure Risk Assessment and Service Improvement of Self-Service Electric Vehicle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Francesco Pinna & Francesca Masala & Chiara Garau, 2017. "Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Elina Dace & Agnis Stibe & Lelde Timma, 2020. "A holistic approach to manage environmental quality by using the Kano model and social cognitive theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 430-443, March.
    9. Shiann Ming Wu & Tsung-chun Chen & Yenchun Jim Wu & Miltiadis Lytras, 2018. "Smart Cities in Taiwan: A Perspective on Big Data Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Dastan Bamwesigye & Petra Hlavackova, 2019. "Analysis of Sustainable Transport for Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Shu-Fong Chang & Jen-Chi Chang & Kuo-Hua Lin & Bin Yu & Yu-Cheng Lee & Sang-Bing (Jason) Tsai & Jie Zhou & Chao Wu & Zi-Chun Yan, 2014. "Measuring the Service Quality of E-Commerce and Competitive Strategies," International Journal of Web Services Research (IJWSR), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 96-115, July.
    12. Tan Yigitcanlar & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2019. "Smart Cities and Mobility: Does the Smartness of Australian Cities Lead to Sustainable Commuting Patterns?," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 21-46, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanja Manders & Elke Klaassen, 2019. "Unpacking the Smart Mobility Concept in the Dutch Context Based on a Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Raquel Soriano-Gonzalez & Elena Perez-Bernabeu & Yusef Ahsini & Patricia Carracedo & Andres Camacho & Angel A. Juan, 2023. "Analyzing Key Performance Indicators for Mobility Logistics in Smart and Sustainable Cities: A Case Study Centered on Barcelona," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Ahmad Adeel & Bruno Notteboom & Ansar Yasar & Kris Scheerlinck & Jeroen Stevens, 2021. "Insights into the Impacts of Mega Transport Infrastructures on the Transformation of Urban Fabric: Case of BRT Lahore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-32, July.
    5. Lazar Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Olga Ryzhuk, 2019. "Advance Management Education for Power-Engineering and Industry of the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Tan Yigitcanlar & Kevin C. Desouza & Luke Butler & Farnoosh Roozkhosh, 2020. "Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-38, March.
    7. Stephany Isabel Vallarta-Serrano & Ana Bricia Galindo-Muro & Riccardo Cespi & Rogelio Bustamante-Bello, 2023. "Analysis of GHG Emission from Cargo Vehicles in Megacities: The Case of the Metropolitan Zone of the Valley of Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Nasiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Shokouhyar, Sajjad, 2021. "Actual consumers' response to purchase refurbished smartphones: Exploring perceived value from product reviews in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Suriyan Jomthanachai & Wai Peng Wong & Khai Wah Khaw, 2024. "An Application of Machine Learning to Logistics Performance Prediction: An Economics Attribute-Based of Collective Instance," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 741-792, February.
    10. Maria Rostasova & Anna Padourova & Tatiana Corejova, 2020. "KANO model as a tool of effective customer satisfaction diagnostics of postal services," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 811-828, December.
    11. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    12. He, Xinyu & He, Fang & Li, Lishuai & Zhang, Lei & Xiao, Gang, 2022. "A route network planning method for urban air delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Jiuh‐Biing Sheu & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2023. "Can we work more safely and healthily with robot partners? A human‐friendly robot–human‐coordinated order fulfillment scheme," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 794-812, March.
    14. Jackson Jinhong Mi & Zongsheng Huang & Kai Wang & Sang-Bing Tsai & Guodong Li & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "The Presence of a Powerful Retailer on Dynamic Collecting Closed-Loop Supply Chain From a Sustainable Innovation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Larissa Diana Michelam & Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Tan Yigitcanlar & Ana Cristina Fachinelli & Leonardo Vils & Wilson Levy, 2021. "Leveraging Smart and Sustainable Development via International Events: Insights from Bento Gonçalves Knowledge Cities World Summit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    16. Brightnes Risimati & Trynos Gumbo & James Chakwizira, 2021. "Spatial Integration of Non-Motorized Transport and Urban Public Transport Infrastructure: A Case of Johannesburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Sewoong Hwang & Zoonky Lee & Jonghyuk Kim, 2019. "Real-Time Pedestrian Flow Analysis Using Networked Sensors for a Smart Subway System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Mirko Guaralda & Greg Hearn & Marcus Foth & Tan Yigitcanlar & Severine Mayere & Lisa Law, 2020. "Towards Australian Regional Turnaround: Insights into Sustainably Accommodating Post-Pandemic Urban Growth in Regional Towns and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Kyunghun Min & Baysok Jun & Jaehyuck Lee & Hong Kim & Katsunori Furuya, 2019. "Analysis of Environmental Issues with an Application of Civil Complaints: The Case of Shiheung City, Republic of Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Liu, Weihua & Long, Shangsong & Wei, Shuang, 2022. "Correlation mechanism between smart technology and smart supply chain innovation performance: A multi-case study from China's companies with Physical Internet," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9319-:d:875540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.