IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9272-d1166555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Efficient Siamese Network and Transfer Learning-Based Predictive Maintenance System for More Sustainable Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Caliskan

    (IMaR Research Centre, Munster Technological University, V92 CX88 Tralee, Ireland)

  • Conor O’Brien

    (IMaR Research Centre, Munster Technological University, V92 CX88 Tralee, Ireland)

  • Krishna Panduru

    (IMaR Research Centre, Munster Technological University, V92 CX88 Tralee, Ireland)

  • Joseph Walsh

    (IMaR Research Centre, Munster Technological University, V92 CX88 Tralee, Ireland)

  • Daniel Riordan

    (IMaR Research Centre, Munster Technological University, V92 CX88 Tralee, Ireland)

Abstract

Legacy machinery poses a specific challenge when integrated into modern manufacturing lines. While modern machinery provides swift methods of integration and inbuilt predictive maintenance (PdM), older machines, while physically fully functional, are less attractive to reuse, a specific reason being their lack of ready-to-implement PdM hardware and models. More sustainable manufacturing operations can be achieved if the useable lifespan of functional older machinery can be extended through retrofittable PdM and modern industrial communication systems. While PdM models can be developed for a class (make/model) of machine with retrofitted sensing, it is often found that legacy machines will deviate greatly from their original form, through nonstandard maintenance and component replacement actions during their lengthy lifespan. This would mean that each legacy machine would require a custom PdM model, a cost often leading to the removal or nonusage of legacy machines. This paper proposes a framework designed for the generation of an efficient PdM algorithm which would allow for the reuse of legacy machines retrofitted with low-cost sensing in modern manufacturing for increased sustainability. Given a limited number of data samples collected from a machine to be maintained, we aim to predict a failure or/and maintenance time by making use of the difference between the characteristics of the variation of the healthy and unhealthy data collected from the machine. We measure the healthiness of the machine by using a Siamese network trained with a public dataset and fine-tuned with data samples obtained from machines with similar characteristics. Although we use different training and testing datasets coming from completely different sources, we obtain reasonable results thanks to the proposed technique. The results of simulations and the statistical analysis enable us to devise a transfer learning technique and a Siamese network employed for failure detection in the machine. The proposed system will allow for the continued use of older machines in modern facilities, enabling more sustainable manufacturing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Caliskan & Conor O’Brien & Krishna Panduru & Joseph Walsh & Daniel Riordan, 2023. "An Efficient Siamese Network and Transfer Learning-Based Predictive Maintenance System for More Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9272-:d:1166555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lolli, Francesco & Coruzzolo, Antonio Maria & Peron, Mirco & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2022. "Age-based preventive maintenance with multiple printing options," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Chen, Mao-Yin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2013. "A degradation path-dependent approach for remaining useful life estimation with an exact and closed-form solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 53-66.
    3. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal, 2019. "A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 251-262.
    4. Youdao Wang & Yifan Zhao, 2022. "Multi-Scale Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using Long Short-Term Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Wang, Jinjiang & Liang, Yuanyuan & Zheng, Yinghao & Gao, Robert X. & Zhang, Fengli, 2020. "An integrated fault diagnosis and prognosis approach for predictive maintenance of wind turbine bearing with limited samples," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 642-650.
    6. Fast, M. & Palmé, T., 2010. "Application of artificial neural networks to the condition monitoring and diagnosis of a combined heat and power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1114-1120.
    7. Biao Li & Tao Wang & Chunxiao Li & Zhen Dong & Hua Yang & Yi Sun & Pengfei Wang, 2022. "A Strategy for Determining the Decommissioning Life of Energy Equipment Based on Economic Factors and Operational Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Alessandro Fontana & Andrea Barni & Deborah Leone & Maurizio Spirito & Agata Tringale & Matteo Ferraris & Joao Reis & Gil Goncalves, 2021. "Circular Economy Strategies for Equipment Lifetime Extension: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Md Junayed Hasan & Jong-Myon Kim, 2019. "Fault Detection of a Spherical Tank Using a Genetic Algorithm-Based Hybrid Feature Pool and k-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    11. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    12. Wan, Shaoke & Li, Xiaohu & Zhang, Yanfei & Liu, Shijie & Hong, Jun & Wang, Dongfeng, 2022. "Bearing remaining useful life prediction with convolutional long short-term memory fusion networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Zhe Sun & Tiantian Chen & Xiaolin Meng & Yan Bao & Liangliang Hu & Ruirui Zhao, 2023. "A Critical Review for Trustworthy and Explainable Structural Health Monitoring and Risk Prognosis of Bridges with Human-In-The-Loop," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    2. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Multi-objective design of aircraft maintenance using Gaussian process learning and adaptive sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    3. Cai, Yue & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram, 2023. "A data-driven approach for condition-based maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 730-738.
    4. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Chatenet, Q. & Remy, E. & Gagnon, M. & Fouladirad, M. & Tahan, A.S., 2021. "Modeling cavitation erosion using non-homogeneous gamma process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Yang, Ningning & Wang, Zhijian & Cai, Wenan & Li, Yanfeng, 2023. "Data Regeneration Based on Multiple Degradation Processes for Remaining Useful Life Estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Zhang, Aibo & Zhang, Tieling & Barros, Anne & Liu, Yiliu, 2020. "Optimization of maintenances following proof tests for the final element of a safety-instrumented system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    10. Uit Het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and load-sharing optimization for two-unit systems with economic dependency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1119-1131.
    11. Esposito, Nicola & Mele, Agostino & Castanier, Bruno & GIORGIO, Massimiliano, 2023. "A hybrid maintenance policy for a deteriorating unit in the presence of three forms of variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    12. Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zheng, Rui & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2021. "An optimal opportunistic maintenance policy for a two-unit series system with general repair using proportional hazards models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    13. Zhang, Wei-Heng & Qin, Jianjun & Lu, Da-Gang & Liu, Min & Faber, Michael H., 2023. "Quantification of the value of condition monitoring system with time-varying monitoring performance in the context of risk-based inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Ling, M.H. & Ng, H.K.T. & Tsui, K.L., 2019. "Bayesian and likelihood inferences on remaining useful life in two-phase degradation models under gamma process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 77-85.
    15. Nguyen, Hung & Abdel-Mottaleb, Noha & Uddin, Shihab & Zhang, Qiong & Lu, Qing & Zhang, He & Li, Mingyang, 2022. "Joint maintenance planning of deteriorating co-located road and water infrastructures with interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2020. "An integrated assessment of safety and efficiency of aircraft maintenance strategies using agent-based modelling and stochastic Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    17. Zheng, Rui & Chen, Bingkun & Gu, Liudong, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance with dynamic thresholds for a system using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Huynh, K.T. & Vu, H.C. & Nguyen, T.D. & Ho, A.C., 2022. "A predictive maintenance model for k-out-of-n:F continuously deteriorating systems subject to stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Cholette, Michael E. & Yu, Hongyang & Borghesani, Pietro & Ma, Lin & Kent, Geoff, 2019. "Degradation modeling and condition-based maintenance of boiler heat exchangers using gamma processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 184-196.
    20. Giorgio, Massimiliano & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2024. "The effect of model misspecification of the bounded transformed gamma process on maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9272-:d:1166555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.