IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6389-d1118687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Review for Trustworthy and Explainable Structural Health Monitoring and Risk Prognosis of Bridges with Human-In-The-Loop

Author

Listed:
  • Zhe Sun

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    The Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Tiantian Chen

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaolin Meng

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    The Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yan Bao

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    The Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Liangliang Hu

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    The Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Ruirui Zhao

    (CUCDE Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China)

Abstract

Trustworthy and explainable structural health monitoring (SHM) of bridges is crucial for ensuring the safe maintenance and operation of deficient structures. Unfortunately, existing SHM methods pose various challenges that interweave cognitive, technical, and decision-making processes. Recent development of emerging sensing devices and technologies enables intelligent acquisition and processing of massive spatiotemporal data. However, such processes always involve human-in-the-loop (HITL), which introduces redundancies and errors that lead to unreliable SHM and service safety diagnosis of bridges. Comprehending human-cyber (HC) reliability issues during SHM processes is necessary for ensuring the reliable SHM of bridges. This study aims at synthesizing studies related to HC reliability for supporting the trustworthy and explainable SHM of bridges. The authors use a bridge inspection case to lead a synthesis of studies that examined techniques relevant to the identified HC reliability issues. This synthesis revealed challenges that impede the industry from monitoring, predicting, and controlling HC reliability in bridges. In conclusion, a research road map was provided for addressing the identified challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhe Sun & Tiantian Chen & Xiaolin Meng & Yan Bao & Liangliang Hu & Ruirui Zhao, 2023. "A Critical Review for Trustworthy and Explainable Structural Health Monitoring and Risk Prognosis of Bridges with Human-In-The-Loop," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6389-:d:1118687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai, Hsueh-Yi & Chen, Chun-Hsien & Khoo, Li-Pheng & Zheng, Pai, 2019. "Unstable approach in aviation: Mental model disconnects between pilots and air traffic controllers and interaction conflicts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 383-391.
    2. Chang, Y.H.J. & Mosleh, A., 2007. "Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(8), pages 1041-1060.
    3. Hunt, L. A. & White, J. W. & Hoogenboom, G., 2001. "Agronomic data: advances in documentation and protocols for exchange and use," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 70(2-3), pages 477-492.
    4. Chang, Y.H.J. & Mosleh, A., 2007. "Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(8), pages 997-1013.
    5. Chang, Y.H.J. & Mosleh, A., 2007. "Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(8), pages 1076-1101.
    6. Laumann, Karin & Rasmussen, Martin, 2016. "Suggested improvements to the definitions of Standardized Plant Analysis of Risk-Human Reliability Analysis (SPAR-H) performance shaping factors, their levels and multipliers and the nominal tasks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 287-300.
    7. J. F. Prather & S. Peters & S. Nowicki & R. Mooney, 2008. "Precise auditory–vocal mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7176), pages 305-310, January.
    8. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2008. "Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1074-1085, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdullah Caliskan & Conor O’Brien & Krishna Panduru & Joseph Walsh & Daniel Riordan, 2023. "An Efficient Siamese Network and Transfer Learning-Based Predictive Maintenance System for More Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Jiaxin Yang & Yan Bao & Zhe Sun & Xiaolin Meng, 2024. "Computer Vision-Based Real-Time Identification of Vehicle Loads for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Carine Dominguez-Péry & Lakshmi Narasimha Raju Vuddaraju & Isabelle Corbett-Etchevers & Rana Tassabehji, 2021. "Reducing maritime accidents in ships by tackling human error: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2009. "Human factors, human reliability and risk assessment in license renewal of a nuclear power plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1818-1826.
    4. Gui Ye & Hongzhe Yue & Jingjing Yang & Hongyang Li & Qingting Xiang & Yuan Fu & Can Cui, 2020. "Understanding the Sociocognitive Process of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, March.
    5. Jung, Wondea & Park, Jinkyun & Kim, Yochan & Choi, Sun Yeong & Kim, Seunghwan, 2020. "HuREX – A framework of HRA data collection from simulators in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. París, C. & Queral, C. & Mula, J. & Gómez-Magán, J. & Sánchez-Perea, M. & Meléndez, E. & Gil, J., 2019. "Quantitative risk reduction by means of recovery strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 13-32.
    7. Peng Liu & Zhizhong Li, 2014. "Human Error Data Collection and Comparison with Predictions by SPAR‐H," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(9), pages 1706-1719, September.
    8. Li, Jue & Li, Heng & Wang, Fan & Cheng, Andy S.K. & Yang, Xincong & Wang, Hongwei, 2021. "Proactive analysis of construction equipment operators’ hazard perception error based on cognitive modeling and a dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Liu, Jianqiao & Zou, Yanhua & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Li & Liu, Xueyang & Ding, Qianqiao & Qin, Zhuomin & ÄŒepin, Marko, 2021. "Analysis of dependencies among performance shaping factors in human reliability analysis based on a system dynamics approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Shirley, Rachel Benish & Smidts, Carol, 2018. "Bridging the simulator gap: Measuring motivational bias in digital nuclear power plant environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 191-209.
    11. Wang, Lijing & Wang, Yanlong & Chen, Yingchun & Pan, Xing & Zhang, Wenjin & Zhu, Yanzhi, 2020. "Methodology for assessing dependencies between factors influencing airline pilot performance reliability: A case of taxiing tasks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Di Pasquale, Valentina & Miranda, Salvatore & Iannone, Raffaele & Riemma, Stefano, 2015. "A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 17-32.
    13. Groth, Katrina M. & Smith, Reuel & Moradi, Ramin, 2019. "A hybrid algorithm for developing third generation HRA methods using simulator data, causal models, and cognitive science," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Bandeira, Michelle Carvalho Galvão Silva Pinto & Correia, Anderson Ribeiro & Martins, Marcelo Ramos, 2018. "General model analysis of aeronautical accidents involving human and organizational factors," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 137-146.
    15. Kim, Yochan & Park, Jinkyun & Jung, Wondea, 2017. "A classification scheme of erroneous behaviors for human error probability estimations based on simulator data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-13.
    16. Maturana, Marcos Coelho & Martins, Marcelo Ramos & Frutuoso e Melo, Paulo Fernando Ferreira, 2021. "Application of a quantitative human performance model to the operational procedure design of a fuel storage pool cooling system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Lee, Hyun-Chul & Seong, Poong-Hyun, 2009. "A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1796-1805.
    18. Aminu Darda’u Rafindadi & Nasir Shafiq & Idris Othman & Miljan Mikić, 2023. "Mechanism Models of the Conventional and Advanced Methods of Construction Safety Training. Is the Traditional Method of Safety Training Sufficient?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Al-Douri, Ahmad & Levine, Camille S. & Groth, Katrina M., 2023. "Identifying human failure events (HFEs) for external hazard probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 1 — methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6389-:d:1118687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.