IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8924-d1161562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Learning Readiness Assessment Using Machine Learning Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Zine

    (LEPPESE Laboratory, Institute of the Economics and Management Sciences, University Centre of Maghnia, PB 600-13300 Al-Zawiya Road, Al-Shuhada District, Maghnia 13300, Algeria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fouzi Harrou

    (Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mohammed Terbeche

    (LEPPESE Laboratory, Institute of the Economics and Management Sciences, University Centre of Maghnia, PB 600-13300 Al-Zawiya Road, Al-Shuhada District, Maghnia 13300, Algeria)

  • Mohammed Bellahcene

    (LEPPESE Laboratory, Institute of the Economics and Management Sciences, University Centre of Maghnia, PB 600-13300 Al-Zawiya Road, Al-Shuhada District, Maghnia 13300, Algeria)

  • Abdelkader Dairi

    (Computer Science Department, University of Science and Technology of Oran-Mohamed Boudiaf (USTO-MB), El Mnaouar, BP 1505, Oran 31000, Algeria)

  • Ying Sun

    (Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Assessing e-learning readiness is crucial for educational institutions to identify areas in their e-learning systems needing improvement and to develop strategies to enhance students’ readiness. This paper presents an effective approach for assessing e-learning readiness by combining the ADKAR model and machine learning-based feature importance identification methods. The motivation behind using machine learning approaches lies in their ability to capture nonlinearity in data and flexibility as data-driven models. This study surveyed faculty members and students in the Economics faculty at Tlemcen University, Algeria, to gather data based on the ADKAR model’s five dimensions: awareness, desire, knowledge, ability, and reinforcement. Correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between all dimensions. Specifically, the pairwise correlation coefficients between readiness and awareness, desire, knowledge, ability, and reinforcement are 0.5233, 0.5983, 0.6374, 0.6645, and 0.3693, respectively. Two machine learning algorithms, random forest (RF) and decision tree (DT), were used to identify the most important ADKAR factors influencing e-learning readiness. In the results, ability and knowledge were consistently identified as the most significant factors, with scores of ability (0.565, 0.514) and knowledge (0.170, 0.251) using RF and DT algorithms, respectively. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to explore further the impact of each variable on the final prediction, highlighting ability as the most influential factor. These findings suggest that universities should focus on enhancing students’ abilities and providing them with the necessary knowledge to increase their readiness for e-learning. This study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing university students’ e-learning readiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Zine & Fouzi Harrou & Mohammed Terbeche & Mohammed Bellahcene & Abdelkader Dairi & Ying Sun, 2023. "E-Learning Readiness Assessment Using Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8924-:d:1161562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arfan Shahzad & Rohail Hassan & Adejare Yusuff Aremu & Arsalan Hussain & Rab Nawaz Lodhi, 2021. "Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 805-826, June.
    2. Archer, Kellie J. & Kimes, Ryan V., 2008. "Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2249-2260, January.
    3. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    4. Fakher Jaoua & Hussein M. Almurad & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Elsayed S. Mohamed, 2022. "E-Learning Success Model in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Educational Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Józef Ober & Anna Kochmańska, 2022. "Remote Learning in Higher Education: Evidence from Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-35, November.
    6. Fernando Ferri & Patrizia Grifoni & Tiziana Guzzo, 2020. "Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Glegg, Stephanie M.N. & Ryce, Andrea & Brownlee, Kala, 2019. "A visual management tool for program planning, project management and evaluation in paediatric health care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 16-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Binh Thai Pham & Chongchong Qi & Lanh Si Ho & Trung Nguyen-Thoi & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Manh Duc Nguyen & Huu Duy Nguyen & Hai-Bang Ly & Hiep Van Le & Indra Prakash, 2020. "A Novel Hybrid Soft Computing Model Using Random Forest and Particle Swarm Optimization for Estimation of Undrained Shear Strength of Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Asma Shaheen & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "Spatial Distribution and Mobility Assessment of Carcinogenic Heavy Metals in Soil Profiles Using Geostatistics and Random Forest, Boruta Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Dohyo Jeong & Dohyeong Kim & Heba Mohiuddin & Seokmin Kang & Sungyeun Kim, 2023. "Regional Disparity in the Educational Impact of COVID-19: A Spatial Difference-in-Difference Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Saliha Anwar & Tayyaba Rafique, 2022. "Development Of Service Quality Scale In Online Higher Education," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 11(1), pages 53-62, March.
    5. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Ahmad Abu-Al-Aish, 2021. "Using E-learning System in Jordanian Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Benefits and Challenges," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 1-49, August.
    7. Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea & Sani, Amir, 2018. "Agent-based model calibration using machine learning surrogates," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 366-389.
    8. Matteo Rucco & Giovanna Viticchi & Lorenzo Falsetti, 2020. "Towards Personalized Diagnosis of Glioblastoma in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) by Topological Interpretable Machine Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Ra’ed Masa’deh & Dmaithan A. AlMajali & Abdullah A. M. AlSokkar & Mohammad Alshinwan & Maha Shehadeh, 2023. "Antecedents of Intention to Use E-Auction: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    10. Jung-sik Hong & Hyeongyu Yeo & Nam-Wook Cho & Taeuk Ahn, 2018. "Identification of Core Suppliers Based on E-Invoice Data Using Supervised Machine Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, October.
    11. Dwi Prasetyanto & Muhamad Rizki & Yos Sunitiyoso, 2022. "Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Sangeeta Lal & Rahul Mourya, 2022. "For CS Educators, by CS Educators: An Exploratory Analysis of Issues and Recommendations for Online Teaching in Computer Science," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.
    14. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/13thfd12aa8rmplfudlgvgahff is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Konrad Kulikowski & Sylwia Przytuła & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2021. "The Motivation of Academics in Remote Teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Polish Universities—Opening the Debate on a New Equilibrium in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Chen, Enhui & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Transfer station choice in a multimodal transit system: An empirical study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 337-355.
    17. Masayoshi Mase & Art B. Owen & Benjamin B. Seiler, 2021. "Cohort Shapley value for algorithmic fairness," Papers 2105.07168, arXiv.org.
    18. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2018. "Sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on D-MORPH regression," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 17-30.
    19. repec:thr:techub:10028:y:2022:i:1:p:630-644 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. José M. Ramírez-Hurtado & Alfredo G. Hernández-Díaz & Ana D. López-Sánchez & Víctor E. Pérez-León, 2021. "Measuring Online Teaching Service Quality in Higher Education in the COVID-19 Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.
    21. Yigit Aydede & Jan Ditzen, 2022. "Identifying the regional drivers of influenza-like illness in Nova Scotia with dominance analysis," Papers 2212.06684, arXiv.org.
    22. Wenxuan Wang & Hangshan Gao & Pengfei Wei & Changcong Zhou, 2017. "Extending first-passage method to reliability sensitivity analysis of motion mechanisms," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 573-586, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8924-:d:1161562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.