IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p1982-d745660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class?

Author

Listed:
  • Dwi Prasetyanto

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Bandung 40124, Indonesia)

  • Muhamad Rizki

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Bandung 40124, Indonesia
    Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Yos Sunitiyoso

    (School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, educational institutions worldwide have made online learning their primary channel. While the various benefits of e-learning have influenced governments to extend the use of this platform after the pandemic, there is the question of the intention of students toward online learning (i.e., participation and location) after the pandemic. This research aims to examine the intention of undergraduate students to do online learning post-COVID-19 pandemic and explore the factors that affect them in Indonesia. To that end, this study distributed an online questionnaire to 906 undergraduate students in mid-2021 in Bandung, Indonesia, and used the Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Multinomial Logistics Regression (MNL) model to explore the factors that influence the intention for e-learning after the pandemic. Teaching quality and time management benefits were found to influence students’ intention to spend more days on e-learning. Lower frequency of e-learning is associated with communication problems, internet problems, and unfavorable conditions at home. While the substitution effect is found in e-learning for students who are able to focus during online class, the neutral effect is found for students who experience internet problems and have a lower monthly allowance. E-learning also modifies trips for students who have higher monthly allowances and experience dizziness from long screen time. Students who reside in well-developed neighborhoods tend to prefer to attend online classes from home.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwi Prasetyanto & Muhamad Rizki & Yos Sunitiyoso, 2022. "Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:1982-:d:745660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/1982/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/1982/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    2. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt4rx589m0 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Pengyu Zhu & Liping Wang & Yanpeng Jiang & Jiangping Zhou, 2018. "Metropolitan size and the impacts of telecommuting on personal travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 385-414, March.
    4. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt1337n657 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt4zc486ph is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Clark, Andrew E. & Nong, Huifu & Zhu, Hongjia & Zhu, Rong, 2021. "Compensating for academic loss: Online learning and student performance during the COVID-19 pandemic," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Fernando Ferri & Patrizia Grifoni & Tiziana Guzzo, 2020. "Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Panigrahi, Ritanjali & Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Thompson S. H. Teo & Sojung Lucia Kim & Li Jiang, 2020. "E-Learning Implementation in South Korea: Integrating Effectiveness and Legitimacy Perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 511-528, April.
    10. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt6wm51523 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Konrad Kulikowski & Sylwia Przytuła & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2021. "The Motivation of Academics in Remote Teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Polish Universities—Opening the Debate on a New Equilibrium in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Gwendolyn Bailey & Thomas LaPoint, 2016. "Comparing Greenhouse Gas Emissions across Texas Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Muhamad Rizki & Tri Basuki Joewono & Dimas B. E. Dharmowijoyo & Prawira Fajarindra Belgiawan, 2021. "Does multitasking improve the travel experience of public transport users? Investigating the activities during commuter travels in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 429-454, June.
    14. Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 1998. "A Synthetic Approach to Estimating the Impacts of Telecommuting on Travel," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(2), pages 215-241, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rouye Pan & Zihan Qin & Lan Zhang & Ligao Lou & Huiju Yu & Junfeng Yang, 2023. "Exploring the impact of intelligent learning tools on students’ independent learning abilities: a PLS-SEM analysis of grade 6 students in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Saeid Asgharzadehbonab & Arif Akkeleş & Hasan Ozder, 2022. "Students’ Academic Performance and Perceptions towards Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Public University in Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Nelson, John D. & Balbontin, Camila & Hensher, David A. & Beck, Matthew, 2023. "A comparative analysis of University Sustainable Travel Plans – Experience from Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 197-208.
    4. Efstathios Bouhouras & Socrates Basbas & Georgios Mintsis & Christos Taxiltaris & Marios Miltiadou & Andreas Nikiforiadis & Maria Natalia Konstantinidou & Eleni Mavropoulou, 2022. "Level of Satisfaction among University Students Using Various Transport Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Ngoc Quyet Le & Shankar Sankaran, 2023. "The importance of interactions in supporting online study," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 39(1), pages 105-113, January.
    6. Petar Vrgović & Jasmina Pekić & Milan Mirković & Andraš Anderla & Bojan Leković, 2022. "Prolonged Emergency Remote Teaching: Sustainable E-Learning or Human Capital Stuck in Online Limbo?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    7. Ensaf Nasser Al Mulhim & Yara Ahmed Mohebeldin Zaky, 2023. "Sustainability in E-Learning: E-Books and Academic Procrastination among Secondary Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Ensaf Nasser Al Mulhim & Dina Ahmed Ismaeel, 2024. "Learning Sustainability: Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Social Media Platforms to Enhance Academic Writing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Lindsay Eastgate & Peter A. Creed & Michelle Hood & Andrea Bialocerkowski, 2023. "It Takes Work: How University Students Manage Role Boundaries when the Future is Calling," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 64(7), pages 1071-1088, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozbilen, Basar & Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2021. "Revisiting the impacts of virtual mobility on travel behavior: An exploration of daily travel time expenditures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 49-62.
    2. Melo, Patrícia C. & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2017. "Home telework and household commuting patterns in Great Britain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-24.
    3. Muhamad Rizki & Tri Basuki Joewono & Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo & Dwi Prasetyanto, 2021. "The Effects of On- and Before- Journey Advantages Using Ride-Sourcing in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Fariha Riska Yumita & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Siti Malkhamah & Muhammad Iqbal Habibi Kamal, 2021. "School Commuting: Barriers, Abilities and Strategies toward Sustainable Public Transport Systems in Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Nicholas S. Caros & Jinhua Zhao, 2022. "Preparing urban mobility for the future of work," Papers 2201.01321, arXiv.org.
    6. Rizki, Muhamad & Basuki Joewono, Tri & Susilo, Yusak O., 2024. "Towards understanding travel in the digital age: A cross-dimensional one-week diary of individual virtual and physical activities in Indonesian cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Jinhyun Hong & David Philip McArthur & Mark Livingston, 2019. "Can Accessing the Internet while Travelling Encourage Commuters to Use Public Transport Regardless of Their Attitude?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.
    8. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Pengyu Zhu, 2013. "Telecommuting, Household Commute and Location Choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(12), pages 2441-2459, September.
    10. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.
    11. Ding, Yu & Lu, Huapu, 2016. "Activity participation as a mediating variable to analyze the effect of land use on travel behavior: A structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-28.
    12. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    13. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    15. Jie Gao & Dick Ettema & Marco Helbich & Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis, 2019. "Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2441-2463, December.
    16. He, Mingwei & He, Chengfeng & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Min, 2022. "Spatiotemporal heterogeneous effects of socio-demographic and built environment on private car usage: An empirical study of Kunming, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Mouratidis, Kostas & Ettema, Dick & Næss, Petter, 2019. "Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 306-320.
    18. Hamdi Lemamsha & Chris Papadopoulos & Gurch Randhawa, 2018. "Perceived Environmental Factors Associated with Obesity in Libyan Men and Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Andreea Barbu & Mirona Ana Maria Popescu & Georgiana Moiceanu, 2022. "Perspective of Teachers and Students towards the Education Process during COVID-19 in Romanian Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:1982-:d:745660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.