IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i5p770-d356759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Personalized Diagnosis of Glioblastoma in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) by Topological Interpretable Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Rucco

    (United Technology Research Center, via Praga 5, 38121 Trento, Italy
    Current address: Raytheon Technology Research Center, via Praga 5, 38121 Trento, Italy.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Giovanna Viticchi

    (Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, 60121 Ancona, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lorenzo Falsetti

    (Internal and Sub-Intensive Medicine Department, A.O.U. “Ospedali Riuniti”, 60020 Ancona, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a fast-growing and highly invasive brain tumor, which tends to occur in adults between the ages of 45 and 70 and it accounts for 52 percent of all primary brain tumors. Usually, GBMs are detected by magnetic resonance images (MRI). Among MRI, a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence produces high quality digital tumor representation. Fast computer-aided detection and segmentation techniques are needed for overcoming subjective medical doctors (MDs) judgment. This study has three main novelties for demonstrating the role of topological features as new set of radiomics features which can be used as pillars of a personalized diagnostic systems of GBM analysis from FLAIR. For the first time topological data analysis is used for analyzing GBM from three complementary perspectives—tumor growth at cell level, temporal evolution of GBM in follow-up period and eventually GBM detection. The second novelty is represented by the definition of a new Shannon-like topological entropy, the so-called Generator Entropy. The third novelty is the combination of topological and textural features for training automatic interpretable machine learning. These novelties are demonstrated by three numerical experiments. Topological Data Analysis of a simplified 2D tumor growth mathematical model had allowed to understand the bio-chemical conditions that facilitate tumor growth—the higher the concentration of chemical nutrients the more virulent the process. Topological data analysis was used for evaluating GBM temporal progression on FLAIR recorded within 90 days following treatment completion and at progression. The experiment had confirmed that persistent entropy is a viable statistics for monitoring GBM evolution during the follow-up period. In the third experiment we developed a novel methodology based on topological and textural features and automatic interpretable machine learning for automatic GBM classification on FLAIR. The algorithm reached a classification accuracy up to 97%.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Rucco & Giovanna Viticchi & Lorenzo Falsetti, 2020. "Towards Personalized Diagnosis of Glioblastoma in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) by Topological Interpretable Machine Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:5:p:770-:d:356759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/5/770/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/5/770/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    2. Giovanni Petri & Martina Scolamiero & Irene Donato & Francesco Vaccarino, 2013. "Topological Strata of Weighted Complex Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Zhe Zhao & Guan Yang & Yusong Lin & Haibo Pang & Meiyun Wang, 2018. "Automated glioma detection and segmentation using graphical models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asma Shaheen & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "Spatial Distribution and Mobility Assessment of Carcinogenic Heavy Metals in Soil Profiles Using Geostatistics and Random Forest, Boruta Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.
    4. Mohamed Zine & Fouzi Harrou & Mohammed Terbeche & Mohammed Bellahcene & Abdelkader Dairi & Ying Sun, 2023. "E-Learning Readiness Assessment Using Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Masayoshi Mase & Art B. Owen & Benjamin B. Seiler, 2021. "Cohort Shapley value for algorithmic fairness," Papers 2105.07168, arXiv.org.
    6. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2018. "Sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on D-MORPH regression," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 17-30.
    7. Wenxuan Wang & Hangshan Gao & Pengfei Wei & Changcong Zhou, 2017. "Extending first-passage method to reliability sensitivity analysis of motion mechanisms," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 573-586, October.
    8. Masayoshi Mase & Art B. Owen & Benjamin B. Seiler, 2022. "Variable importance without impossible data," Papers 2205.15750, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    9. Lambert, Romain S.C. & Lemke, Frank & Kucherenko, Sergei S. & Song, Shufang & Shah, Nilay, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using sparse high dimensional model representations generated by the group method of data handling," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 42-54.
    10. Hou, Tianfeng & Nuyens, Dirk & Roels, Staf & Janssen, Hans, 2019. "Quasi-Monte Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and error estimation in engineering applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Jiang, Xian, 2019. "An efficient method for moment-independent global sensitivity analysis by dimensional reduction technique and principle of maximum entropy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 174-182.
    12. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2017. "Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 1-16.
    13. McFarland, John & DeCarlo, Erin, 2020. "A Monte Carlo framework for probabilistic analysis and variance decomposition with distribution parameter uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Mi, Jinhua & Beer, Michael & Li, Yan-Feng & Broggi, Matteo & Cheng, Yuhua, 2020. "Reliability and importance analysis of uncertain system with common cause failures based on survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    15. Ehre, Max & Papaioannou, Iason & Straub, Daniel, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis in high dimensions with PLS-PCE," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Serrano, Daniel Hernández & Villarroel, Javier & Hernández-Serrano, Juan & Tocino, Ángel, 2023. "Stochastic simplicial contagion model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Matthias Bogaert & Michel Ballings & Martijn Hosten & Dirk Van den Poel, 2017. "Identifying Soccer Players on Facebook Through Predictive Analytics," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 274-297, December.
    18. Philippe Goulet Coulombe, 2020. "The Macroeconomy as a Random Forest," Papers 2006.12724, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    19. Zhou, Xiaoyi & Lu, Pan & Zheng, Zijian & Tolliver, Denver & Keramati, Amin, 2020. "Accident Prediction Accuracy Assessment for Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Using Random Forest Algorithm Compared with Decision Tree," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Jason Abaluck & Leila Agha & David C. Chan Jr & Daniel Singer & Diana Zhu, 2020. "Fixing Misallocation with Guidelines: Awareness vs. Adherence," NBER Working Papers 27467, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:5:p:770-:d:356759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.