IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8647-d1156524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symbiosis-Evolution Game and Scenario-Simulation Analysis of Advanced Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenghan Chen

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Tianzhen Tang

    (School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)

  • Fan Zhang

    (Department of Management Engineering and Equipment Economics, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Mingran Deng

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the importance of advanced manufacturing in the innovation and sustainability of nations and regions has been demonstrated. Several studies have highlighted the need to maintain and build an advanced manufacturing-enterprise-innovation ecosystem (AMEIE). Thus, in this paper, the symbiosis-evolution model of AMEIE is established according to ecological theory. On the basis of analyzing the evolution equilibrium and its stability conditions, different symbiosis-evolution scenarios were examined through a computer simulation. The results showed the following; (1) AMEIE is a complex system composed of advanced manufacturing enterprises, new-generation information-technology enterprises, and innovation-service organizations that create value cooperatively around resource acquisition and innovation interaction in a given symbiotic environment; (2) in this innovation ecosystem, symbiosis-evolution results depend on the symbiotic coefficient between the subjects; (3) the synergy of the subjects can be maximized in mutualism symbiosis evolution, while system members should strive to switch from parasitic symbiosis evolution or partial symbiosis evolution to mutualism symbiosis evolution. Therefore, countermeasures and suggestions are proposed, such as balancing the dynamics of population symbiosis evolution, optimizing the symbiotic environment, and formulating and improving efficient collaborative innovation mechanisms, which can provide theoretical support to the promotion of the evolution and development of AMEIE, along with mutualism symbiosis evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenghan Chen & Tianzhen Tang & Fan Zhang & Mingran Deng, 2023. "Symbiosis-Evolution Game and Scenario-Simulation Analysis of Advanced Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8647-:d:1156524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2016. "Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 625-648, April.
    2. Reynolds, Elisabeth B. & Uygun, Yilmaz, 2018. "Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 178-191.
    3. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    4. Gregory Tassey, 2010. "Rationales and mechanisms for revitalizing US manufacturing R&D strategies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 283-333, June.
    5. Zhao Rong & David C. Broadstock & Yuanyuan Peng, 2018. "Initial submarket positioning and firm survival: evidence from the British automobile industry, 1895–1970," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 965-993, December.
    6. Granstrand, Ove & Holgersson, Marcus, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    7. Gregory Tassey, 2014. "Competing in Advanced Manufacturing: The Need for Improved Growth Models and Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(1), pages 27-48, Winter.
    8. Jiamin Lu & Nishan Chen & Xin Feng, 2023. "Competitive Analysis of the Online Leasing Problem for Scarce Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, January.
    9. Tatyana Tolstykh & Nadezhda Shmeleva & Leyla Gamidullaeva, 2020. "Evaluation of Circular and Integration Potentials of Innovation Ecosystems for Industrial Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    10. W. C. Abram & K. Noray, 2018. "Political Corruption and Public Activism: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Analysis," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Paavo Ritala & Leila Armila & Kirsimarja Blomqvist, 2009. "Innovation Orchestration Capability — Defining The Organizational And Individual Level Determinants," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 569-591.
    12. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Andrea Patacconi, 2019. "A theory of the US innovation ecosystem: evolution and the social value of diversity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(2), pages 289-307.
    13. Ron Adner & Daniel Feiler, 2019. "Interdependence, Perception, and Investment Choices: An Experimental Approach to Decision Making in Innovation Ecosystems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 109-125, February.
    14. Douglas P. Hannah & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2018. "How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3163-3192, December.
    15. Fukuda, Kayano & Watanabe, Chihiro, 2008. "Japanese and US perspectives on the National Innovation Ecosystem," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 49-63.
    16. Sillero, Neftalí, 2011. "What does ecological modelling model? A proposed classification of ecological niche models based on their underlying methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1343-1346.
    17. Oh, Deog-Seong & Phillips, Fred & Park, Sehee & Lee, Eunghyun, 2016. "Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bicong Wu & Syoum Negassi, 2023. "Symbiotic Evolution Mechanism of the Digital Innovation Ecosystem for the Smart Car Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanzhang Gu & Longying Hu & Hongjin Zhang & Chenxuan Hou, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystem Research: Emerging Trends and Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Patrycja Klimas & Wojciech Czakon, 2022. "Species in the wild: a typology of innovation ecosystems," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 249-282, January.
    4. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Fleury, André Leme & Oliveira, Maicon Gouvêa de & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo, 2021. "Ecosystem policy roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Pushpananthan, Gouthanan & Elmquist, Maria, 2022. "Joining forces to create value: The emergence of an innovation ecosystem," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Dong, Caiting & Liu, Xielin & Tang, Fangcheng & Qiu, Shumin, 2023. "How upstream innovativeness of ecosystems affects firms' innovation: The contingent role of absorptive capacity and upstream dependence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Bo Liu & Yun-Fei Shao & Guowei Liu & Debing Ni, 2022. "An Evolutionary Analysis of Relational Governance in an Innovation Ecosystem," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    8. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Mark A. Phillips & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2018. "Exploring Emerging Ecosystem Boundaries: Defining ‘The Game’," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    11. Xie, Xuemei & Liu, Xiaojie & Blanco, Cristina, 2023. "Evaluating and forecasting the niche fitness of regional innovation ecosystems: A comparative evaluation of different optimized grey models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Bicong Wu & Syoum Negassi, 2023. "Symbiotic Evolution Mechanism of the Digital Innovation Ecosystem for the Smart Car Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Lijie Feng & Jiarui Lu & Jinfeng Wang, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Enterprise Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Miehé, Lucas & Palmié, Maximilian & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Connection successfully established: How complementors use connectivity technologies to join existing ecosystems – Four archetype strategies from the mobility sector," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    15. Dedehayir, Ozgur & Mäkinen, Saku J. & Ortt, J. Roland, 2022. "Innovation ecosystems as structures: Actor roles, timing of their entrance, and interactions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    16. Larissa Oliveira‐Duarte & Diane Aparecida Reis & Andre Leme Fleury & Rosana Aparecida Vasques & Homero Fonseca Filho & Mikko Koria & Julia Baruque‐Ramos, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystem framework directed to Sustainable Development Goal #17 partnerships implementation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 1018-1036, September.
    17. Ghazinoory, Sepehr & Nasri, Shohreh & Afshari-Mofrad, Masoud & Taghizadeh Moghadam, Negin, 2023. "National Innovation Biome (NIB): A novel conceptualization for innovation development at the national level," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    18. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Salerno, Mario Sergio, 2021. "Managing uncertainty propagation in innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Shimei Jiang & Yimei Hu & Ziyuan Wang, 2019. "Core Firm Based View on the Mechanism of Constructing an Enterprise Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Haier Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Pasquale Pizzimenti & Yapeng Ou, 2023. "Cities in Transition and Urban Innovation Ecosystems: Place and Innovation Dynamics in the Case of Boston and Cambridge (USA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8647-:d:1156524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.