IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v212y2025ics0040162525000137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To solve or to occupy: Addressing hybrid bottlenecks in innovation ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Draschbacher, Thomas
  • Rachinger, Michael
  • Engwall, Mats

Abstract

Bottlenecks have recently emerged as one of the key objects of inquiry in research on innovation ecosystems. The broader literature is split into two streams on technological and strategic bottlenecks, relying on the implicit assumption that strategic bottlenecks emerge from technological bottlenecks. In practice, however, many ecosystems get “stuck” in the transition from technological to strategic bottlenecks. This results in the formation of hybrid bottlenecks that combine the features of both technological and strategic bottlenecks. The existing recommendations regarding strategies that can be used to address bottlenecks fail to explain actors' strategic responses in these situations. We address this gap by conducting an exploratory multiple case study of strategies actors apply to address the hybrid bottleneck of public charging infrastructure in the innovation ecosystem of battery electric vehicles. We combine resource dependence theory and resource-based theory to show how actors combine different strategies to address hybrid bottlenecks based on how heavily they depend on the availability of bottleneck resources to create value in the innovation ecosystem, their expectations about the future value of these resources, and the ambiguity and uncertainty of the ecosystem's future evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Draschbacher, Thomas & Rachinger, Michael & Engwall, Mats, 2025. "To solve or to occupy: Addressing hybrid bottlenecks in innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000137
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000137
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.