IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p4918-d797428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calcium-Rich Pigeonpea Seed Coat: A Potential Byproduct for Food and Pharmaceutical Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Dhanapal Susmitha

    (Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India
    Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

  • Thiyagarajan Kalaimagal

    (Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

  • Ramachandran Senthil

    (Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India)

  • Mani Vetriventhan

    (Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India)

  • Seetha Anitha

    (Nutrition Cluster, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India)

  • Swaminathan Manonmani

    (Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

  • Prabhakaran Jeyakumar

    (Office of the Registrar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

  • Surender Reddymalla

    (Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India)

  • Ovais Peerzada

    (Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India)

  • Venkata Narayana Arveti

    (Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India)

  • Vania C. R. Azevedo

    (International Potato Center (CIP), Lima 1558, Peru)

  • Kuldeep Singh

    (Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India)

Abstract

Pigeonpea is a protein-rich legume which is consumed worldwide in a variety of forms (whole seed, dhal , and as a green vegetable). In India, pigeonpea is milled to yield dhal (cotyledon) and this process generates 25–35% waste byproducts. The hull (seed coat) which accounts for 10% of the byproduct is disposed of either as waste or low-cost cattle feed. To recycle the waste byproducts into the food value chain, this study was conducted with the objectives: (i) to estimate nutrient accumulation in the major seed fractions (cotyledon and seed coat), (ii) to estimate the percentage of nutrient contribution by major seed fractions, (iii) to assess the percentage of nutrient loss due to dehulling, and (iv) to determine the scope of seed coat in nutritional value addition. For this, a subset of 60 diverse pigeonpea accessions selected from 600 pigeonpea accessions raised during the 2019 and 2020 rainy seasons at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, was subjected to a cotyledon and seed coat nutrient analysis. The three-way analysis of variance revealed the significant influence of cropping years, seed fractions, genotypes, and their interactions on nutrient accumulation. The nutrients, namely protein (32.28 ± 2.29%), P (476.51 ± 39.05 mg/100 g), K (1557.73 ± 66.82 mg/100 g), Fe (4.42 ± 0.41 mg/100 g), Zn (2.25 ± 0.21 mg/100 g), and Cu (0.95 ± 0.07 mg/100 g) were enriched in cotyledon. Mn was equally enriched in both the cotyledon and seed coat (1.02 ± 0.12 mg/100 g and 0.97 ± 0.34 mg/100 g, respectively). The seed coat had a high concentration of Ca (652.02 ± 114.82 mg/100 g), and Mg (249.19 ± 34.12 mg/100 g) with wide variability for Fe (2.74–5.61 mg/100 g), Zn (0.88–3.95 mg/100 g), Cu (0.38–1.44 mg/100 g), and Mn (0.58–2.18 mg/100 g). It is noteworthy that the protein and P contents in the cotyledon were 7 and 18 times higher than that in the seed coat, respectively, and the Ca content in the seed coat was 12 times higher than that in the cotyledon. A correlation study revealed that for overall nutrient improvement in dhal , selection for a small seed size was desirable. On an average, the percentage of nutrient contribution by major seed fractions revealed that the cotyledon portion contributed around 95% protein and P; 90% K and Zn; 85% Fe, Cu, and Mn; and 75% Mg, while the seed coat portion contributed nearly 65% Ca to the whole grain. The findings of high Fe and protein concentrations in the cotyledon and high Ca accumulation in the seed coat can serve as a new guide for improved technological fractionation of these components to serve as a novel functional food ingredient and as a dietary supplement that can address malnutrition.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhanapal Susmitha & Thiyagarajan Kalaimagal & Ramachandran Senthil & Mani Vetriventhan & Seetha Anitha & Swaminathan Manonmani & Prabhakaran Jeyakumar & Surender Reddymalla & Ovais Peerzada & Venkata , 2022. "Calcium-Rich Pigeonpea Seed Coat: A Potential Byproduct for Food and Pharmaceutical Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:4918-:d:797428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/4918/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/4918/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. AfDB AfDB, . "Improving Statistics for Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture & Rural Development - An Action Plan for Africa (2011–2015) - Bulletin N°3," Global Strategy Implementation Bulletin, African Development Bank, number 368.
    2. Meenakshi, J.V. & Johnson, Nancy L. & Manyong, Victor M. & DeGroote, Hugo & Javelosa, Josyline & Yanggen, David R. & Naher, Firdousi & Gonzalez, Carolina & García, James & Meng, Erika, 2010. "How Cost-Effective is Biofortification in Combating Micronutrient Malnutrition? An Ex ante Assessment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-75, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imen Turki Abdelhedi & Sonia Zouari Zouari, 2020. "Agriculture and Food Security in North Africa: a Theoretical and Empirical Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(1), pages 193-210, March.
    2. Nguema, Abigail & Norton, George W. & Fregene, Martin & Sayre, Richard & Manary, Mark, 2011. "Expected economic benefits of meeting nutritional needs through biofortified cassava in Nigeria and Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(01), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Edeh, Hyacinth Onuorah & Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena, 2014. "Determinants of Change and Household Responses to Food Insecurity: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 169750, Agricultural Economics Society.
    4. Jae Yeon Park & Arlette Saint Ville & Timothy Schwinghamer & Hugo Melgar-Quiñonez, 2019. "Heterogeneous factors predict food insecurity among the elderly in developed countries: insights from a multi-national analysis of 48 countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(3), pages 541-552, June.
    5. Suleiman, A. & Tosan, Fregene, . "Analysis of Costs and Returns of Artisanal Fish Marketing in Kebbi State, Nigeria," Journal of Rural Economics and Development, University of Ibadan, Department of Agricultural Economics, vol. 20, pages 1-9.
    6. Sujan Chandra Paul & Md Arif Hosen & Jyotirmay Biswas & Shahadat Hossain, 2021. "Primary education and its impact on literacy rate: A division wise comparative study of Bangladesh," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 391-405, June.
    7. Adewale Oparinde & Abhijit Banerji & Ekin Birol & Paul Ilona, 2016. "Information and consumer willingness to pay for biofortified yellow cassava: evidence from experimental auctions in Nigeria," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(2), pages 215-233, March.
    8. Gasparatos, A. & von Maltitz, G.P. & Johnson, F.X. & Lee, L. & Mathai, M. & Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. & Willis, K.J., 2015. "Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: Drivers, impacts and priority policy areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 879-901.
    9. Lentz, Erin C. & Barrett, Christopher B., 2013. "The economics and nutritional impacts of food assistance policies and programs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 151-163.
    10. Helmy, Imane, 2020. "Livelihood Diversification Strategies: Resisting Vulnerability in Egypt," GLO Discussion Paper Series 441, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Hafiz Zahid Mahmood & Ijaz Hussain & Sana Iftikhar & Muhammad Khan & Fakh Run Nisa, 2014. "Role of Livestock in Food Security: An Ascertainment from Punjab Pakistan," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(8), pages 458-470, August.
    12. Adekunle, A., 2018. "Effect of Membership of Group-Farming Cooperatives on Farmers Food Production and Poverty Status in Nigeria," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277420, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Measuring and Mapping Food Security Status of Rajasthan, India: A District-Level Analysis," OSF Preprints d2buh, Center for Open Science.
    14. Rachel Sabates‐Wheeler & Jeremy Lind & John Hoddinott & Mulugeta Tefera Taye, 2021. "Graduation after 10 years of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme: Surviving but still not thriving," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(4), pages 511-531, July.
    15. Diao, Xinshen 22905 & Ecker, Olivier & Kennedy, Adam & Mabiso, Athur, 2011. "Making agriculture pro-nutrition: Opportunities in Tanzania," IFPRI discussion papers 1124, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Asare-Marfo, Dorene & Birol, Ekin & Karandikar,Bhushana & Roy, Devesh, 2011. "A latent class approach to investigating farmer demand for biofortified staple food crops in developing countries: The case of high-iron pearl millet in Maharashtra, India," HarvestPlus working papers 7, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Claudia de Luca & Javier López-Murcia & Elisa Conticelli & Angela Santangelo & Michelle Perello & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "Participatory Process for Regenerating Rural Areas through Heritage-Led Plans: The RURITAGE Community-Based Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Elgizouli, Ismail & Umbadda, Siddig, 2013. "Foreign Aid and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 081, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Eugene Okraku Asare & Novel Kishor Bhujel & Helena Čížková & Aleš Rajchl, 2022. "Fortification of fruit products - A review," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 40(4), pages 259-272.
    20. Jones, Kelly M. & de Brauw, Alan, 2015. "Using Agriculture to Improve Child Health: Promoting Orange Sweet Potatoes Reduces Diarrhea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 15-24.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:4918-:d:797428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.