IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4402-d788983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Categorical Evaluation of Scientific Research Efficiency in Chinese Universities: Basic and Applied Research

Author

Listed:
  • Yukun Shi

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Duchun Wang

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
    School of Continuing Education, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Zimeng Zhang

    (School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

The categorical evaluation of scientific research efficiency is of great significance to technological innovation and research management. It is also helpful to promote the sustainable development of basic research and applied research in universities. In this study, 32 “Double First-Class” universities directly under the Ministry of Education in China were evaluated with the research efficiency evaluation system of basic research and applied research used, which is constructed based on the “research efficiency classification evaluation”. The empirical results show that the efficiency of basic research is low but total factor productivity grows faster, while the efficiency of applied research is high but total factor productivity grows slowly, and the gap between the two will be further reduced in the future. At the same time, scientific research efficiency depends on the type of university and disciplinary strengths: Comprehensive and normal universities are good at basic research while scientific and agricultural and forestry universities are more efficient in applied research. Universities should consolidate their strengths while making key breakthroughs on their shortcomings, optimize the structure of research inputs and outputs, and improve the efficiency of research resources utilization to actively promote the national innovation system and the construction of a powerful nation of science and technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukun Shi & Duchun Wang & Zimeng Zhang, 2022. "Categorical Evaluation of Scientific Research Efficiency in Chinese Universities: Basic and Applied Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4402-:d:788983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4402/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4402/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amara, Nabil & Rhaiem, Mehdi & Halilem, Norrin, 2020. "Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 296-306.
    2. Wuzhao Xue & Hua Li & Rizwan Ali & Ramiz ur Rehman & Gonzalo Fernández-Sánchez, 2021. "Assessing the Static and Dynamic Efficiency of Scientific Research of HEIs China: Three Stage DEA–Malmquist Index Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Avkiran, Necmi K., 2001. "Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 57-80, March.
    4. Jie Wu & Ganggang Zhang & Qingyuan Zhu & Zhixiang Zhou, 2020. "An efficiency analysis of higher education institutions in China from a regional perspective considering the external environmental impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 57-70, January.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Chen, Kaihua & Kou, Mingting & Fu, Xiaolan, 2018. "Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: An application of dynamic DEA to China's regional R&D systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 103-114.
    7. Alice Bertoletti & Geraint Johnes, 2021. "Efficiency in university-industry collaboration: an analysis of UK higher education institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7679-7714, September.
    8. Johnes, Jill, 2006. "Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 273-288, June.
    9. Jesús Pastor & C. Lovell, 2007. "Circularity of the Malmquist productivity index," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 33(3), pages 591-599, December.
    10. Gerhard Kempkes & Carsten Pohl, 2010. "The efficiency of German universities-some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(16), pages 2063-2079.
    11. Bin Zheng & Wenfeng Chen & Hui Zhao, 2021. "The Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Industry–University Research Collaboration Efficiency in Chinese Mainland Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Xiong, Xi & Yang, Guo-liang & Guan, Zhong-cheng, 2018. "Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamic DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 784-805.
    13. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    14. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainable Evaluation of Social Science Research in Higher Education Institutions Based on Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    16. Zhong, Wei & Yuan, Wei & Li, Susan X. & Huang, Zhimin, 2011. "The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 447-455, August.
    17. Hao Cai & Ling Liang & Jing Tang & Qianxian Wang & Lihong Wei & Jiaping Xie, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Efficiency and Influencing Factors of the Photovoltaic Industry in China and an Analysis of Its Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.
    18. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    19. Abramo, Giovanni & Cicero, Tindaro & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2011. "A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 618-628.
    20. Shamohammadi, Mehdi & Oh, Dong-hyun, 2019. "Measuring the efficiency changes of private universities of Korea: A two-stage network data envelopment analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    21. Johannes Sauer & Catherine J. Morrison Paul, 2013. "The empirical identification of heterogeneous technologies and technical change," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(11), pages 1461-1479, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kui Yi & Pingping Li, 2022. "Zero Waste Scientific Research Evaluation: The Scientific Research Evaluation System Framework to Stimulate Scholars’ Empathy and Innovation Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Shengbo Liu & Xiaoting Luo & Miaomiao Liu, 2023. "Was Chinese “Double-First Class” Construction Policy Influential? Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wuzhao Xue & Hua Li & Rizwan Ali & Ramiz ur Rehman & Gonzalo Fernández-Sánchez, 2021. "Assessing the Static and Dynamic Efficiency of Scientific Research of HEIs China: Three Stage DEA–Malmquist Index Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    3. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainability in Chinese Higher Educational Institutions’ Social Science Research: A Performance Interface toward Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Zhang, Ganggang & Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2020. "Performance evaluation and enrollment quota allocation for higher education institutions in China," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Jie Wu & Ganggang Zhang & Qingyuan Zhu & Zhixiang Zhou, 2020. "An efficiency analysis of higher education institutions in China from a regional perspective considering the external environmental impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 57-70, January.
    6. Yang, Guo-liang & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Song, Yao-yao, 2018. "Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 10-30.
    7. Yang, Guoliang & Ahlgren, Per & Yang, Liying & Rousseau, Ronald & Ding, Jielan, 2016. "Using multi-level frontiers in DEA models to grade countries/territories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 238-253.
    8. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capozza, Claudia & Porcelli, Francesco, 2015. "Hotelling competition and teaching efficiency of Italian university faculties. A semi-parametric analysis," MPRA Paper 62927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Shamohammadi, Mehdi & Oh, Dong-hyun, 2019. "Measuring the efficiency changes of private universities of Korea: A two-stage network data envelopment analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Kun Chen & Xian-tong Ren & Guo-liang Yang & Hai-bo Qin, 2022. "The other side of the coin: The declining of Chinese social science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 127-143, January.
    11. Mehdi Rhaiem, 2017. "Measurement and determinants of academic research efficiency: a systematic review of the evidence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 581-615, February.
    12. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainable Evaluation of Social Science Research in Higher Education Institutions Based on Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Huang, Shwu-Huei & Yu, Ming-Miin & Huang, Ya-Ling, 2022. "Evaluation of the efficiency of the local tax administration in Taiwan: Application of a dynamic network data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Sun, Yu & Yang, Feng & Wang, Dawei & Ang, Sheng, 2023. "Efficiency evaluation for higher education institutions in China considering unbalanced regional development: A meta-frontier Super-SBM model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Ruiz, José L. & Segura, José V. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2015. "Benchmarking and target setting with expert preferences: An application to the evaluation of educational performance of Spanish universities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 594-605.
    16. Lin, Tzu-Yu & Chiu, Sheng-Hsiung & Yang, Hai-Lan, 2022. "Performance evaluation for regional innovation systems development in China based on the two-stage SBM-DNDEA model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Y. c{C}inar, 2016. "Research and Teaching Efficiencies of Turkish Universities with Heterogeneity Considerations: Application of Multi-Activity DEA and DEA by Sequential Exclusion of Alternatives Methods," Papers 1701.07318, arXiv.org.
    18. Kristof De Witte & Laura López-Torres, 2017. "Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(4), pages 339-363, April.
    19. Calogero Guccio & Marco Ferdinando Martorana & Isidoro Mazza, 2016. "Efficiency assessment and convergence in teaching and research in Italian public universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(3), pages 1063-1094, June.
    20. Amara, Nabil & Rhaiem, Mehdi & Halilem, Norrin, 2020. "Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 296-306.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4402-:d:788983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.