IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2773-d759601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smooth and Resilient Human–Machine Teamwork as an Industry 5.0 Design Challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Eija Kaasinen

    (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 33101 Tampere, Finland)

  • Anu-Hanna Anttila

    (Finnish Industrial Union, 00531 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Päivi Heikkilä

    (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 33101 Tampere, Finland)

  • Jari Laarni

    (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 33101 Tampere, Finland)

  • Hanna Koskinen

    (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 33101 Tampere, Finland)

  • Antti Väätänen

    (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 33101 Tampere, Finland)

Abstract

Smart machine companions such as artificial intelligence (AI) assistants and collaborative robots are rapidly populating the factory floor. Future factory floor workers will work in teams that include both human co-workers and smart machine actors. The visions of Industry 5.0 describe sustainable, resilient, and human-centered future factories that will require smart and resilient capabilities both from next-generation manufacturing systems and human operators. What kinds of approaches can help design these kinds of resilient human–machine teams and collaborations within them? In this paper, we analyze this design challenge, and we propose basing the design on the joint cognitive systems approach. The established joint cognitive systems approach can be complemented with approaches that support human centricity in the early phases of design, as well as in the development of continuously co-evolving human–machine teams. We propose approaches to observing and analyzing the collaboration in human–machine teams, developing the concept of operations with relevant stakeholders, and including ethical aspects in the design and development. We base our work on the joint cognitive systems approach and propose complementary approaches and methods, namely: actor–network theory, the concept of operations and ethically aware design. We identify their possibilities and challenges in designing and developing smooth human–machine teams for Industry 5.0 manufacturing systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Eija Kaasinen & Anu-Hanna Anttila & Päivi Heikkilä & Jari Laarni & Hanna Koskinen & Antti Väätänen, 2022. "Smooth and Resilient Human–Machine Teamwork as an Industry 5.0 Design Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2773-:d:759601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2773/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2773/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sgarbossa, F. & Grosse, E. H. & Neumann, W. P. & Battini, D. & Glock, C. H., 2020. "Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 120615, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Hendrik Stern & Till Becker, 2019. "Concept and Evaluation of a Method for the Integration of Human Factors into Human-Oriented Work Design in Cyber-Physical Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Young Won Park & Junjiro Shintaku, 2022. "Sustainable Human–Machine Collaborations in Digital Transformation Technologies Adoption: A Comparative Case Study of Japan and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Menti, Federica & Romero, David & Jacobsen, Peter, 2023. "A technology assessment and implementation model for evaluating socio-cultural and technical factors for the successful deployment of Logistics 4.0 technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Nicolas Murcia & Olivier Cardin & Abdelmoula Mohafid & Marie-Pascale Senkel, 2021. "Health-Related Parameters for Evaluation Methodologies of Human Operators in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Ilenia Bua, 2021. "The Role of Human Resource Practices for the Development of Operator 4.0 in Industry 4.0 Organisations: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Sebastjan Lazar & Vojko Potočan & Dorota Klimecka-Tatar & Matevz Obrecht, 2022. "Boosting Sustainable Operations with Sustainable Supply Chain Modeling: A Case of Organizational Culture and Normative Commitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Marzena Podgórska, 2022. "Challenges and Perspectives in Innovative Projects Focused on Sustainable Industry 4.0—A Case Study on Polish Project Teams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Maurizio Faccio & Irene Granata & Alberto Menini & Mattia Milanese & Chiara Rossato & Matteo Bottin & Riccardo Minto & Patrik Pluchino & Luciano Gamberini & Giovanni Boschetti & Giulio Rosati, 2023. "Human factors in cobot era: a review of modern production systems features," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 85-106, January.
    7. Brauner, Philipp & Ziefle, Martina, 2022. "Beyond playful learning – Serious games for the human-centric digital transformation of production and a design process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Yue Chen & Yisong Li, 2024. "Storage Location Assignment for Improving Human–Robot Collaborative Order-Picking Efficiency in Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Arturo Realyvásquez-Vargas & Karina Cecilia Arredondo-Soto & Julio Blanco-Fernandez & Joanna Denisse Sandoval-Quintanilla & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz, 2020. "Work Standardization and Anthropometric Workstation Design as an Integrated Approach to Sustainable Workplaces in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Sumona Mukhuty & Arvind Upadhyay & Holly Rothwell, 2022. "Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2068-2081, July.
    12. Maja Trstenjak & Tihomir Opetuk & Goran Đukić & Hrvoje Cajner, 2022. "Logistics 5.0 Implementation Model Based on Decision Support Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Pengbo Yang, 2022. "Information Management in the Logistics and Distribution Sector Using Metaheuristic Techniques," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Reiman, Arto & Kaivo-oja, Jari & Parviainen, Elina & Takala, Esa-Pekka & Lauraeus, Theresa, 2021. "Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context – A scoping review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Ozdemir, Rifat & Sarigol, Ilkan & AlMutairi, Sarah & AlMeea, Sarah & Murad, Abrar & Naqi, Aseel & AlNasser, Noor, 2021. "Fuzzy multi-objective model for assembly line balancing with ergonomic risks consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    16. Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier, 2021. "Ageing workforce effects in Dual-Resource Constrained job-shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Kaupe, Victor & Feldmann, Carsten & Wagner, Heiko, 2021. "Exoskeletons: Productivity and ergonomics in logistics:a systematic review," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 527-561, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    18. Battini, Daria & Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Zennaro, Ilenia & Das, Ajay, 2022. "Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    19. Claudia Tania Picinin & Bruno Pedroso & Maik Arnold & Renata Vidart Klafke & Guilherme Moreira Caetano Pinto, 2023. "A Review of the Literature about Sustainability in the Work of the Future: An Overview of Industry 4.0 and Human Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2773-:d:759601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.