IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16569-d999570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission Intensity of Main Crops in Henan Province

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Li

    (School of Economics and Trade, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Tingting Cao

    (School of Economics and Trade, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Zhongye Sun

    (School of Economics and Trade, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

Agriculture is the national economy’s primary industry, and its carbon emissions (CE) are one of the most significant factors influencing the environment. As a large agrarian province, reducing the carbon emission intensity (CEI) of agricultural is of great practical significance to the sustainable development of agriculture in Henan province. In this paper, the CEI of rice, maize, and wheat from 2001 to 2020 in 18 prefecture-level cities in Henan province was calculated, and its spatial-temporal evolution patterns were analyzed. The Spatial Dubin model was used to study the impact mechanism and spatial spillover effect of the main crops’ CEI. As a result, the following was determined: (1) The CEI of main crops in 18 cities of Henan province showed an inverted “V” shape, whereas the geographical distribution showed an oblique “T” shape mainly in the north and west. (2) The CEI of main crops was significantly different under different factors. Technical efficiency, agricultural openness, urbanization level, agriculture production agglomeration, and agriculture fiscal expenditure negatively impact the main crops’ CEI. The structure of the food industry and the cost of water for agriculture and forestry positively affect the CEI of main crops. (3) The spatial spillover effects of agricultural openness, production technology efficiency, environmental protection, and fiscal expenditure spread to the surrounding areas through factor flow, technology spillover, and policy spread. The efficiency of production technology and fiscal expenditure on environmental protection have a demonstrative effect, and the degree of agricultural openness has a siphon effect. Based on the research results, we should strengthen agriculture technology extension and investment and gradually improve technical efficiency. Agriculture should be financially supported by the government. We will actively promote the optimization of the structure of the grain industry by promoting orderly urbanization, strengthening the sharing of factors among regions, and reducing the CEI of main crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Li & Tingting Cao & Zhongye Sun, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission Intensity of Main Crops in Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16569-:d:999570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - A third pole of technical efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1554-1563, December.
    2. Elhorst, J. Paul & Lacombe, Donald J. & Piras, Gianfranco, 2012. "On model specification and parameter space definitions in higher order spatial econometric models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 211-220.
    3. Dumortier, Jerome & Elobeid, Amani, 2021. "Effects of a carbon tax in the United States on agricultural markets and carbon emissions from land-use change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. An Liu & Henk Folmer & Johan H L Oud, 2014. "Estimation of Autoregressive Models with Two Types of Weak Spatial Dependence by Means of the W-Based and the Latent Variables Approach: Evidence from Monte Carlo Simulations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(1), pages 186-202, January.
    2. Qin, Quande & Li, Xin & Li, Li & Zhen, Wei & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Air emissions perspective on energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of China’s coastal areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 604-614.
    3. A. M. Aldanondo & V. L. Casasnovas, 2015. "Input aggregation bias in technical efficiency with multiple criteria analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 430-435, April.
    4. Wang, Xiong & Wang, Xiao & Ren, Xiaohang & Wen, Fenghua, 2022. "Can digital financial inclusion affect CO2 emissions of China at the prefecture level? Evidence from a spatial econometric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Abudureheman, Maliyamu & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Cong, 2022. "Spatial effects of dynamic comprehensive energy efficiency on CO2 reduction in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Zebin Zheng & Wenjun Xiao & Ziye Cheng, 2023. "China’s Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency Assessment Based on Coordinated Reduction in Pollution and Carbon Emission: From the 11th to the 13th Five-Year Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Wu, Haitao, 2022. "The role of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on green total factor energy efficiency: Does institutional quality matters? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Gómez-Calvet, Roberto & Conesa, David & Gómez-Calvet, Ana Rosa & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 137-154.
    9. Philipp Piribauer & Jesús Crespo Cuaresma, 2016. "Bayesian Variable Selection in Spatial Autoregressive Models," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 457-479, October.
    10. Sgrignoli, Paolo & Metulini, Rodolfo & Schiavo, Stefano & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2015. "The relation between global migration and trade networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 417(C), pages 245-260.
    11. Xiangqian Wang & Shudong Wang & Yongqiu Xia, 2022. "Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of the Total Factor Environmental Efficiency in China’s Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Li, Kunpeng, 2017. "Fixed-effects dynamic spatial panel data models and impulse response analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 102-121.
    13. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Debarsy, Nicolas & Jin, Fei & Lee, Lung-fei, 2015. "Large sample properties of the matrix exponential spatial specification with an application to FDI," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 1-21.
    15. Harald Badinger & Peter Egger, 2013. "Estimation and testing of higher-order spatial autoregressive panel data error component models," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 453-489, October.
    16. Wen Yao & Zhuo Sun, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on High-Quality Development of Agriculture: A China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Wang, Ke-Liang & Sun, Ting-Ting & Xu, Ru-Yu & Miao, Zhuang & Cheng, Yun-He, 2022. "How does internet development promote urban green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Pinar, Mehmet & Stengos, Thanasis & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2020. "On the construction of a feasible range of multidimensional poverty under benchmark weight uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 415-427.
    19. Qianyu Zhao & Boyu Xie & Mengyao Han, 2023. "Unpacking the Sub-Regional Spatial Network of Land-Use Carbon Emissions: The Case of Sichuan Province in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Xiangjing Zeng & Yong Ma & Jie Ren & Biao He, 2022. "Analysis of the Green Development Effects of High-Speed Railways Based on Eco-Efficiency: Evidence from Multisource Remote Sensing and Statistical Data of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16569-:d:999570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.