IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16492-d998479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maturity of CSR Implementation at the Organizational Level—From Literature Review to a Comprehensive Model

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej

    (Department of Labor, Capital and Innovation, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Magdalena Rojek-Nowosielska

    (Department of Strategic Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Sokołowska-Durkalec

    (Department of Enterprise Studies, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Urszula Markowska-Przybyła

    (Department of Enterprise Studies, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

This paper fills the gap in the studies addressing the problem of corporate social responsibility (CSR) concept implementation maturity in an organization approached holistically. It is based on an integrative literature review covering 104 publications indexed in WoS and Scopus. The literature review shows that the maturity of the implementation of CSR at the organizational level is rarely the subject of assessment. The authors dealing with CSR maturity focus their deliberations on such specific areas of enterprise functioning as IT, operational management, supply management, product design and project management. Other authors place CSR among different areas that should be taken into account while determining the maturity of implementation of Industry 4.0 or organizational reputation management. The most commonly used measurement is the five-point scale of the levels typical for CMMI. The theoretical models presented in the source literature are rarely subject to empirical operationalization. This study offers a four-dimensional CSR maturity model that can be used to assess the maturity level of the CSR concept implementation in different types of organizations and also to analyze and compare the maturity levels of different organizations. The dimensions are areas, stakeholders, actions and participation. There are five levels of CSR maturity and only the achievement of the fifth levels in all four dimensions proves the highest level of CSR. The usefulness of the model was determined by eight experts (practitioners working in different organizations) with the use of the “sum-score decision rule”. Both practical and theoretical implications result from this model.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Magdalena Rojek-Nowosielska & Agnieszka Sokołowska-Durkalec & Urszula Markowska-Przybyła, 2022. "Maturity of CSR Implementation at the Organizational Level—From Literature Review to a Comprehensive Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16492-:d:998479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Witek-Crabb, 2019. "CSR Maturity in Polish Listed Companies: A Qualitative Diagnosis Based on a Progression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Davidson de Almeida Santos & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Luis Perez Zotes & Sérgio Luiz Braga França & Guilherme Vinagre Pinto de Souza & Robson Amarante de Araújo, 2020. "Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    3. S. Hansen & Benjamin Dunford & Alan Boss & R. Boss & Ingo Angermeier, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Benefits of Employee Trust: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 29-45, August.
    4. François Maon & Adam Lindgreen & Valérie Swaen, 2009. "Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 71-89, April.
    5. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    6. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    8. Anna Cierniak-Emerych & Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, 2017. "Employee Epowerment — Terminological And Practical Perspective In Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 8(2), pages 301-316, June.
    9. Mitsuru Kodama, 2019. "Developing Holistic Strategic Management in the Advanced ICT Era," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0218, August.
    10. Ewa Stawiarska & Danuta Szwajca & Mirosław Matusek & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Diagnosis of the Maturity Level of Implementing Industry 4.0 Solutions in Selected Functional Areas of Management of Automotive Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-38, April.
    11. Magdalena Rojek-Nowosielska & Łukasz Kuźmiński, 2021. "CSR Level Versus Employees’ Attitudes towards the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
    13. Raúl Payá Castiblanque, 2020. "The Impact of the Direct Participation of Workers on the Rates of Absenteeism in the Spanish Labor Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    14. John Simmons, 2008. "Ethics and morality in human resource management," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1/2), pages 8-23, March.
    15. Schwartz, Mark S. & Carroll, Archie B., 2003. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 503-530, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruna Maria Gerônimo & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Maturity Models for Testing and Calibration Laboratories: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Najeb Masoud, 2017. "How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Fatih Özcan & Meral Elçi, 2020. "Employees’ Perception of CSR Affecting Employer Brand, Brand Image, and Corporate Reputation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    3. Francisco González Santa Cruz & Iliana Loor Alcívar & Nelly Moreira Mero & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2020. "Analysis of the Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Study Applied to Co-operativism in Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 517-534, April.
    4. Lin Zhang & Yuehua Xu & Honghui Chen, 2022. "Do Returnee Executives Value Corporate Philanthropy? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 411-430, August.
    5. Hafiz Yasir Ali & Muhammad Asrar‐ul‐Haq & Shaheera Amin & Sadaf Noor & Muhammad Haris‐ul‐Mahasbi & Muhammad Kashif Aslam, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: The mediating role of employee engagement in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2908-2919, November.
    6. Ghi-Feng Yen & Hui-Chun Tsao, 2020. "Reexamining Consumers’ Cognition and Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility via a DANP and IPA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Bongani Munkuli & Renee Horne, 2018. "Financial Markets Value Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – A Study of the South African Mining Sector," Africagrowth Agenda, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 17-22.
    8. Gahye Hong & Eunmi Kim, 2017. "Overcoming country-of-origin image constraints on hiring: the moderating role of CSR," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 253-271, December.
    9. Severin J. S. Oeckl & Stephen Morrow, 2022. "CSR in Professional Football in Times of Crisis: New Ways in a Challenging New Normal," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, September.
    10. M. Kouzez & J. Y. Lee & G. Branellec & J. Oh, 2023. "RSE et banques en ligne : le cas du marché sud-coréen," Post-Print hal-04469792, HAL.
    11. Inga Hardeck & Rebecca Hertl, 2014. "Consumer Reactions to Corporate Tax Strategies: Effects on Corporate Reputation and Purchasing Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 309-326, August.
    12. Wells, Victoria K. & Gregory Smith, Diana & Taheri, Babak & Manika, Danae & McCowlen, Clair, 2016. "An exploration of CSR development in heritage tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-17.
    13. Ali Alotaibi & Francis Edum-Fotwe & Andrew D.F. Price, 2019. "Critical Barriers to Social Responsibility Implementation within Mega-Construction Projects: The Case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Egle Jakunskiene, 2021. "Assessment of the Impact of Social Responsibility on Poverty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Marcin Zemigala, 2020. "Spoleczna odpowiedzialnosc biznesu i spoleczna odpowiedzialnosc nauki – w poszukiwaniu analogii," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(32), pages 108-120.
    16. Michał Jurek, 2014. "The genesis and evolution of CSR self-regulation with special refer-ence to the case of financial institutions," Working papers wpaper70, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    17. Meixner, Oliver & Pollhammer, Elisabeth & Haas, Rainer, 2015. "The communication of CSR activities via social media A qualitative approach to identify opportunities and challenges for small and medium-sized enterprises in the agri-food sector," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206248, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    18. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Mariusz Zielinski, 2020. "How CSR Affects Polish Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 785-803.
    19. Sergiy D. Dmytriyev & R. Edward Freeman & Jacob Hörisch, 2021. "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1441-1470, September.
    20. Marzanna Katarzyna Witek-Hajduk & Piotr Zaborek, 2016. "Does Business Model Affect CSR Involvement? A Survey of Polish Manufacturing and Service Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16492-:d:998479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.