IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15971-d988991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Assessment of Solid Waste to Energy Technologies and Their Perspectives in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Behnam Dastjerdi

    (School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Vladimir Strezov

    (School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Ravinder Kumar

    (School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
    College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia)

  • Masud Behnia

    (School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
    CTR, Building 500, Stanford, CA 94305-3035, USA)

Abstract

The study assessed the environmental impacts of landfilling, anaerobic digestion and incineration technologies and investigated the effect of the replaced source of electricity on the environmental impacts of these waste to energy (WtE) technologies. Data published in the national pollutant inventories and ReCiPe impact assessment method were employed in this study. The study showed that electricity generation through incineration had the highest impacts on human health and ecosystems, followed by landfilling. Compared to the electricity of the Australian national grid, electricity generated from all three WtE technologies have a lower environmental impact. The results revealed that global warming and fine particulate matter formation with more than 97.6% contribution were the main impact factors for human health, while terrestrial acidification, global warming and ozone formation were contributing to more than 99% of the impacts to ecosystems. Global warming was the most impactful category on human health and ecosystems from incineration with over 85% contribution to both endpoint categories. Incineration revealed significantly higher avoided global warming impacts to human health and ecosystems than landfilling from the treatment of one tonne of solid waste by replacing electricity from brown coal, black coal or the Australian power grid. The growing share of renewable energy in the Australian power grid is expected to decrease the grid GHG emissions and the effect of the avoided impacts of replaced electricity. The results revealed that if the GHG emissions from the Australian power grid (757 kg CO 2 eq/MWh) decrease to break-even point (621 kg CO 2 eq/MWh), incineration loses the climate advantage over landfilling.

Suggested Citation

  • Behnam Dastjerdi & Vladimir Strezov & Ravinder Kumar & Masud Behnia, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Solid Waste to Energy Technologies and Their Perspectives in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15971-:d:988991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suraj Adebayo Opatokun & Ana Lopez-Sabiron & German Ferreira & Vladimir Strezov, 2017. "Life Cycle Analysis of Energy Production from Food Waste through Anaerobic Digestion, Pyrolysis and Integrated Energy System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Dastjerdi, B. & Strezov, V. & Kumar, R. & Behnia, M., 2019. "An evaluation of the potential of waste to energy technologies for residual solid waste in New South Wales, Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Tomić, Tihomir & Schneider, Daniel Rolph, 2018. "The role of energy from waste in circular economy and closing the loop concept – Energy analysis approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 268-287.
    4. Ana Ramos & Carlos Afonso Teixeira & Abel Rouboa, 2018. "Environmental Analysis of Waste-to-Energy—A Portuguese Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Tong, Huanhuan & Yao, Zhiyi & Lim, Jun Wei & Mao, Liwei & Zhang, Jingxing & Ge, Tian Shu & Peng, Ying Hong & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "Harvest green energy through energy recovery from waste: A technology review and an assessment of Singapore," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 163-178.
    6. Georgios Banias & Maria Batsioula & Charisios Achillas & Sotiris I. Patsios & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Dionysis Bochtis & Nicolas Moussiopoulos, 2020. "A Life Cycle Analysis Approach for the Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Practices: The Case Study of the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Ripa, M. & Fiorentino, G. & Giani, H. & Clausen, A. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "Refuse recovered biomass fuel from municipal solid waste. A life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 211-225.
    8. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, Saeed & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mahmoudi, Seyed Bagher, 2019. "A review on beet sugar industry with a focus on implementation of waste-to-energy strategy for power supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 423-442.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dastjerdi, B. & Strezov, V. & Kumar, R. & Behnia, M., 2019. "An evaluation of the potential of waste to energy technologies for residual solid waste in New South Wales, Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Xu, H. & Lin, W.Y. & Dal Magro, F. & Li, T & Py, X. & Romagnoli, A., 2019. "Towards higher energy efficiency in future waste-to-energy plants with novel latent heat storage-based thermal buffer system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 324-337.
    3. Mancini, G. & Luciano, A. & Bolzonella, D. & Fatone, F. & Viotti, P. & Fino, D., 2021. "A water-waste-energy nexus approach to bridge the sustainability gap in landfill-based waste management regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos & Loizidou, Maria, 2019. "Energy efficiency of waste-to-energy plants with a focus on the comparison and the constraints of the 3T method and the R1 formula," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 323-329.
    5. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    6. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Schulzke, T. & Westermeyer, J. & Giani, H. & Hornsby, C., 2018. "Combustion of Refined Renewable Biomass Fuel (RRBF) in a bubbling fluidized bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 84-94.
    8. Álvaro J. Arnal & Patricia Royo & Gianpiero Pataro & Giovanna Ferrari & Víctor J. Ferreira & Ana M. López-Sabirón & Germán A. Ferreira, 2018. "Implementation of PEF Treatment at Real-Scale Tomatoes Processing Considering LCA Methodology as an Innovation Strategy in the Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    9. G. Perkoulidis & A. Malamakis & G. Banias & N. Moussiopoulos, 2022. "Development of a Methodological Framework for the Evaluation of the Material and Energy Recovery Potential of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Implementation in Five Greek Regions," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    10. Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Sulaiman, Alawi & Goli, Sayed Amir Hossein & Tavassoli-Kafrani, Elham & Ghaffari, Akram & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Kim, Ki-Hyun, 2020. "Unlocking the potential of walnut husk extract in the production of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Naseri, Hakim & Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami & Ranjbar, Iraj & Zamani, Davood Mohammad, 2021. "Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Theppitak, Sarut & Hungwe, Douglas & Ding, Lu & Xin, Dai & Yu, Guangsuo & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2020. "Comparison on solid biofuel production from wet and dry carbonization processes of food wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    14. Esakkimuthu, Sivakumar & Krishnamurthy, Venkatesan & Wang, Shuang & Hu, Xun & K, Swaminathan & Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah, 2020. "Application of p-coumaric acid for extraordinary lipid production in Tetradesmus obliquus: A sustainable approach towards enhanced biodiesel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 368-376.
    15. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Amid, Sama & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Kianian, Ghaem, 2020. "Life cycle assessment analysis of an ultrasound-assisted system converting waste cooking oil into biodiesel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1352-1364.
    16. Jaime A. Mesa & Carlos Fúquene-Retamoso & Aníbal Maury-Ramírez, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.
    18. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Park, Young-Kwon & Fallahi, Alireza & Sulaiman, Alawi & Ranjbari, Meisam & Rahnama, Hassan & Aghbashl, 2022. "Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Salehi-Amiri, Amirhossein & Akbapour, Navid & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa & Gajpal, Yuvraj & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2022. "Designing an effective two-stage, sustainable, and IoT based waste management system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    20. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 200-218.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15971-:d:988991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.