IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14500-d963675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Regional Development of Romania (2000–2019), Measured with a Multidimensional PEESH Index

Author

Listed:
  • Valér Veres

    (Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, Department of Sociology and Social Work in Hungarian, Babes-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • József Benedek

    (Faculty of Geography, Department of Geography in Hungarian, Babes-Bolyai University, Str. Clinicilor 5–7, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Faculty of Economics, Institute of World and Regional Economics, Miskolc University, Egyetemi út No. 1, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary)

  • Ibolya Török

    (Faculty of Geography, Department of Geography in Hungarian, Babes-Bolyai University, Str. Clinicilor 5–7, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Measuring development is a long-standing challenge in the social sciences. Although multidimensional and multivariate approaches to development present several conceptual and/or methodological problems, some studies have pointed out that the unidimensional view of economic progress has failed on a large scale. The main purpose of our article is to elaborate a multidimensional composite index called the PEESH (population, economic, education, social, and health) Development Index, for measuring socio-economic development in Romania with a territorial profile. The PEESH DI index presented in this paper contains five sub-dimensions: population dynamics, economy and labor force, education, social conditions and housing, and health and life conditions, including 22 core indicators. The components of the resulting multidimensional index were weighted using factor analysis and then aggregated transversely into a composite index. Our results show that the differentiated increase of the indicators composing the PEESH DI resulted in a certain restructuring of the development hierarchy of Romania’s counties between 2000 and 2019. These empirical facts strengthen the idea that development cannot be reduced to only economic growth, it comprises an important social dimension as well. Finally, we have strongly argued in this paper that it is time to switch from a single-sided and reductionist perspective of the measurement of regional disparities, within the framework of the Cohesion Policy in the European Union, to a wider and multidimensional perspective, reflecting the complex character of the development process.

Suggested Citation

  • Valér Veres & József Benedek & Ibolya Török, 2022. "Changes in the Regional Development of Romania (2000–2019), Measured with a Multidimensional PEESH Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14500-:d:963675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alkire, Sabina, 2002. "Dimensions of Human Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 181-205, February.
    2. Fleurbaey, Marc & Blanchet, Didier, 2013. "Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199767199.
    3. Lin Yang, 2018. "Measuring Well-being: A Multidimensional Index Integrating Subjective Well-being and Preferences," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 456-476, October.
    4. József BENEDEK & Alexander C. LEMBCKE, 2017. "Characteristics of recovery and resilience in the Romanian regions," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8, pages 95-126, December.
    5. József Benedek & Kinga Ivan & Ibolya Török & Arnold Temerdek & Iulian‐Horia Holobâcă, 2021. "Indicator‐based assessment of local and regional progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): An integrated approach from Romania," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 860-875, September.
    6. Ana Perisic & Vanja Wagner, 2015. "Development index: analysis of the basic instrument of Croatian regional policy," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 39(2), pages 205-236.
    7. Frederik Booysen, 2002. "An Overview and Evaluation of Composite Indices of Development," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 115-151, August.
    8. Ilinca-Valentina Stoica & Antoni F. Tulla & Daniela Zamfir & Alexandru-Ionuț Petrișor, 2020. "Exploring the Urban Strength of Small Towns in Romania," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 843-875, December.
    9. Suman Seth and Antonio Villar, 2017. "Measuring Human Development and Human Deprivations," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp110.pdf, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    10. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp110 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Miles Cahill, 2001. "An Economic and Social Development Index," Working Papers 0101, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    12. repec:ipf:finteo:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:205-236 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    14. M. Saisana & A. Saltelli & S. Tarantola, 2005. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(2), pages 307-323, March.
    15. Ibinceanu Onica Mihaela Cristina & Cristache Nicoleta & Dobrea Răzvan Cătălin & Florescu Margareta, 2021. "Regional Development in Romania: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Factors for Measuring a Prosperous and Sustainable Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cantone, Giulio Giacomo & Tomaselli, Venera, 2024. "On the Coherence of Composite Indexes: Multiversal Model and Specification Analysis for an Index of Well-Being," MetaArXiv d5y26, Center for Open Science.
    2. Rajko Tomaš, 2022. "Measurement of the Concentration of Potential Quality of Life in Local Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 79-109, August.
    3. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2018. "σ-µ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices," MPRA Paper 83569, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2019. "Sigma-Mu efficiency analysis: A methodology for evaluating units through composite indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 942-960.
    5. Gaganis, Chrysovalantis & Pasiouras, Fotios & Tasiou, Menelaos & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2021. "CISEF: A composite index of social, environmental and financial performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 394-409.
    6. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2023. "Gauging energy poverty in developing countries with a composite metric of electricity access," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Usubiaga-Liaño, Arkaitz & Ekins, Paul, 2024. "Methodological choices for reflecting strong sustainability in composite indices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Camilla Salvatore & Silvia Biffignandi & Annamaria Bianchi, 2024. "Augmenting business statistics information by combining traditional data with textual data: a composite indicator approach," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 82(1), pages 71-91, April.
    9. Sayel Basel & K. U. Gopakumar & R. Prabhakara Rao, 2020. "Broad-based index for measurement of development," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(1), pages 182-206, June.
    10. Idiano D'Adamo & Cristina Di Carlo & Massimo Gastaldi & Antonio Felice Uricchio, 2024. "Equitable and sustainable well‐being indicators: A study of Italian regional disparities towards sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5538-5549, October.
    11. Justin Ehrlich & Simon Medcalfe & Shane Sanders, 2021. "Composite Index Ranking of Economic Well-Being in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: How Prevalent are Rank Anomalies?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 543-562, September.
    12. repec:osf:metaar:d5y26_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Milica Maricic & Jose A. Egea & Veljko Jeremic, 2019. "A Hybrid Enhanced Scatter Search—Composite I-Distance Indicator (eSS-CIDI) Optimization Approach for Determining Weights Within Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 497-537, July.
    14. Matteo Mazziotta & Adriano Pareto, 2022. "Normalization methods for spatio‐temporal analysis of environmental performance: Revisiting the Min–Max method," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), August.
    15. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2019. "The Ordinal Input for Cardinal Output Approach of Non-compensatory Composite Indicators: The PROMETHEE Scoring Method," MPRA Paper 95816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2021. "The ordinal input for cardinal output approach of non-compensatory composite indicators: the PROMETHEE scoring method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 225-246.
    17. Matthias Firgo & Fabian Gabelberger & Andreas Reinstaller & Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2024. "Assessing Regional Production Potential to Strengthen the Security of Supply in Strategic Products," WIFO Working Papers 670, WIFO.
    18. Panagiotis Ravanos & Giannis Karagiannis, 2023. "Correction: A VEA Benefit-of-the-Doubt Model for the HDI," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 793-796, November.
    19. Fusco, Elisa, 2023. "Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Samy Katumba & Julia Kadt & Mark Orkin & Paul Fatti, 2022. "Construction of a Reflective Quality of Life Index for Gauteng Province in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 373-408, November.
    21. Renata Pelissari & Sarah Ben Amor & Álvaro Oliveira D’Antona & Eduardo José Marandola Júnior & Leonardo Tomazeli Duarte, 2024. "A semi-supervised multi-criteria sorting approach to constructing social vulnerability composite indicators," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 337(1), pages 235-260, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14500-:d:963675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.