IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14495-d963396.html

Urban Water Management with a Full Cost Recovery Policy: The Impact of Externalities on Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Sanju John Thomas

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT), Cochin 682022, India)

  • Mukund Haribhau Bade

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sardar Vallabhai National Institute of Technology (SVNIT), Surat 395007, India)

  • Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Odisha University of Technology and Research (OUTR), Bhubaneswar 751029, India)

  • Sheffy Thomas

    (Department of Electronics and Instrumentation, Federal Institute of Science and Technology (FISAT), Angamaly 683577, India)

  • Ajith Kumar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT), Cochin 682022, India)

  • Mohamed M. Awad

    (Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

Abstract

Water has complex cost dimensions and is considered a scarce commodity under a reduced-recycle-reuse system with a full cost recovery strategy. The impact of externalities from the social, economic, and ecological aspects of exploiting water resources are often not accounted into the pricing mechanism. We discuss the current work model as well as a pricing strategy for a water infrastructure program with a full cost recovery strategy. Single and multi-block pricing models are created, and their effect on water pricing is discussed. The impact of externalities is accounted for, and respective cost components, namely, environmental cost, opportunity cost, and ecological imbalance cost are included in the water pricing, to analyze the impact on the cost of produced water. A comparison under the normalized, single-block and multi-block pricing strategy are discussed and the payback period is found. It is seen that the unit cost of potable and non-potable water is brought down from 0.94 USD/m 3 and 0.51 USD/m 3 to 0.62 USD/m 3 and 0.29 USD/m 3 , respectively using a multi-block pricing strategy. It is recommended that policy interventions in a full cost recovery water pricing strategy should consider the cost of externalities with a multi-block pricing system for breakeven in water infrastructural investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanju John Thomas & Mukund Haribhau Bade & Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo & Sheffy Thomas & Ajith Kumar & Mohamed M. Awad, 2022. "Urban Water Management with a Full Cost Recovery Policy: The Impact of Externalities on Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14495-:d:963396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona FRONE, 2012. "Issues On The Role Of Efficient Water Pricing For Sustainable Water Management," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 34(1(43)), pages 84-111, June.
    2. repec:iwt:rerpts:h041069 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bithas, Kostas, 2008. "The sustainable residential water use: Sustainability, efficiency and social equity. The European experience," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 221-229, December.
    4. Julie A. Hewitt & W. Michael Hanemann, 1995. "A Discrete/Continuous Choice Approach to Residential Water Demand under Block Rate Pricing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 71(2), pages 173-192.
    5. Mohammad Alghassab & Zafar A. Khan & Abdullah Altamimi & Muhammad Imran & Fahad F. Alruwaili, 2022. "Prospects of Hybrid Energy in Saudi Arabia, Exploring Irrigation Application in Shaqra," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Sonia Ferdous Hoque & Dennis Wichelns, 2013. "State-of-the-art review: designing urban water tariffs to recover costs and promote wise use," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 472-491, September.
    7. Mihir Shah, 2016. "Urban Water Systems in India: A Way Forward," Working Papers id:10936, eSocialSciences.
    8. Enrico Marinelli & Serena Radini & Çağrı Akyol & Massimiliano Sgroi & Anna Laura Eusebi & Gian Battista Bischetti & Adriano Mancini & Francesco Fatone, 2021. "Water-Energy-Food-Climate Nexus in an Integrated Peri-Urban Wastewater Treatment and Reuse System: From Theory to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Zomer, Robert J. & Bossio, Deborah A. & Trabucco, Antonio & Yuanjie, Li & Gupta, Diwan C. & Singh, Virendra P., 2007. "Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India," IWMI Research Reports 53067, International Water Management Institute.
    10. Yahaya Sani & Miklas Scholz, 2022. "Interplay of Water–Energy Security and Food Consumption Patterns towards Achieving Nutrition Security in Katsina State, North-Western Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mónica Maldonado-Devis & Vicent Almenar-Llongo, 2021. "A Panel Data Estimation of Domestic Water Demand with IRT Tariff Structure: The Case of the City of Valencia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Henrique Monteiro, 2010. "Residential Water Demand in Portugal: checking for efficiency-based justifications for increasing block tariffs," Working Papers Series 1 ercwp0110, ISCTE-IUL, Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL).
    3. Olmstead, Sheila M. & Michael Hanemann, W. & Stavins, Robert N., 2007. "Water demand under alternative price structures," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 181-198, September.
    4. Acuña, Guillermo, 2017. "Elasticidades de la demanda de agua en Chile [Elasticities of water demand in Chile]," MPRA Paper 82916, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Corral, Leonardo & Fisher, Anthony C. & Hatch, Nile W., 1998. "Price And Non-Price Influences On Water Conservation: An Econometric Model Of Aggregate Demand Under Nonlinear Budget Constraint," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20958, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Théophile Azomahou, 2008. "Minimum distance estimation of the spatial panel autoregressive model," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 2(1), pages 49-83, April.
    7. Simona FRONE, 2012. "Issues On The Role Of Efficient Water Pricing For Sustainable Water Management," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 34(1(43)), pages 84-111, June.
    8. Lenka Slavíková & Vítězslav Malý & Michael Rost & Lubomír Petružela & Ondřej Vojáček, 2013. "Impacts of Climate Variables on Residential Water Consumption in the Czech Republic," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(2), pages 365-379, January.
    9. Medina Carlos & Leonardo Morales, 2008. "Demanda por servicios públicos domiciliarios y pérdida irrecuperable de los subsidios: el caso colombiano," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    10. Shen, Xiaobo & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "The shadow prices and demand elasticities of agricultural water in China: A StoNED-based analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 21-28.
    11. Whittington, Dale & Nauges, Céline & Fuente, David & Wu, Xun, 2015. "A diagnostic tool for estimating the incidence of subsidies delivered by water utilities in low- and medium-income countries, with illustrative simulations," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 70-81.
    12. Wang, Zhaohua & Sun, Yefei & Wang, Bo, 2020. "Policy cognition is more effective than step tariff in promoting electricity saving behaviour of residents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Lott, Corey & Tchigriaeva, Elena & Rollins, Kimberly & Stoddard, Shawn, 2014. "Residential water demand, climate change and exogenous economic trends," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170660, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Francisco Silva Pinto & Rui Cunha Marques, 2016. "Tariff Suitability Framework for Water Supply Services," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(6), pages 2037-2053, April.
    15. Mark Hoffmann & Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2006. "Urban water demand with fixed volumetric charging in a large municipality: the case of Brisbane, Australia ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(3), pages 347-359, September.
    16. Céline Nauges & Caroline Berg, 2009. "Demand for Piped and Non-piped Water Supply Services: Evidence from Southwest Sri Lanka," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 42(4), pages 535-549, April.
    17. Arjan Ruijs, 2007. "Welfare and Distribution Effects of Water Pricing Policies," Working Papers 2007.92, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    18. Gong, Chengzhu & Yu, Shiwei & Zhu, Kejun & Hailu, Atakelty, 2016. "Evaluating the influence of increasing block tariffs in residential gas sector using agent-based computational economics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 334-347.
    19. Lyazzat Nugumanova & Miriam Frey & Natalya Yemelina & Stanislav Yugay, 2017. "Environmental Problems and Policies in Kazakhstan: Air pollution, waste and water," Working Papers 366, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    20. Kenneth A. Baerenklau & Kurt A. Schwabe & Ariel Dinar, 2014. "The Residential Water Demand Effect of Increasing Block Rate Water Budgets," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(4), pages 683-699.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14495-:d:963396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.