IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v78y2018icp166-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using spatial models of temporal tree dynamics to evaluate the implementation of EU afforestation policies in rangelands of SW Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Herguido Sevillano, E.
  • Lavado Contador, J.F.
  • Schnabel, S.
  • Pulido, M.
  • Ibáñez, J.

Abstract

Iberian silvopastoral systems known as dehesas in Spain and montados in Portugal are undergoing a spatially polarized process by which many of the main areas lack tree recruitment, whereas marginal lands suffer abandonment and shrub encroachment. These ongoing processes should be considered when designing afforestation measures and policies. We analyzed the temporal tree dynamics in 800 randomly selected plots of 100 m radius in dehesas and treeless pasturelands of Extremadura by comparing aerial images taken in 1956 and 2012. Based on this data, spatial models that predict areas prone to undergo or lack natural tree recruitment were developed using three data mining algorithms: MARS (Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines), Random Forest (RF) and Stochastic Gradient Boosting (TreeNet, TN). A number of 51 candidate environmental, physical and land use and cover spatial variables were used as predictors in models, from which the main 15 were selected. The statistical models developed were deployed to the spatial context of the rangelands in Extremadura and, separately, to the afforested areas performed under the UE First Afforestation of Agricultural Land program between 1992 and 2013. The percentage of area predicted as prone to tree recruitment was calculated in each case. The three data mining algorithms used showed high fitness and low misclassification rates. Although the drivers and patterns of the different models were similar, outstanding differences were observed among models attending the area prone to tree recruitment. A model ensemble was also produced as a map of agreement reflecting the majority vote among models. Despite these differences, when maps of the model results were related to the afforested surfaces, the three algorithms pointed to the similar conclusion, i.e., the afforestations performed in the studied rangelands barely discriminated between areas that already showed or lacked natural tree regeneration. In conclusion, data mining technics are suitable to develop high-performance spatial models of vegetation dynamics. These models are useful to help policy design, decision-making and assessment about the implementation of afforestation measures and could be used to improve the spatial targeting of future programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Herguido Sevillano, E. & Lavado Contador, J.F. & Schnabel, S. & Pulido, M. & Ibáñez, J., 2018. "Using spatial models of temporal tree dynamics to evaluate the implementation of EU afforestation policies in rangelands of SW Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 166-175.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:166-175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717314576
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zomer, Robert J. & Bossio, Deborah A. & Trabucco, Antonio & Yuanjie, Li & Gupta, Diwan C. & Singh, Virendra P., 2007. "Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India," IWMI Research Reports 53067, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Zomer, Robert J. & Bossio, Deborah A. & Trabucco, Antonio & Yuanjie, Li & Gupta, Diwan C. & Singh, Virendra P., 2007. "Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India," IWMI Research Reports H041069, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ullah, Ayat & Zeb, Alam & Liu, Jinlong & Mahmood, Nasir & Kächele, Harald, 2021. "Transhumant pastoralist knowledge of infectious diseases and adoption of alternative land use strategies in the Hindu-Kush Himalayan (HKH) region of Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. David Fernández-Nogueira & Eduardo Corbelle-Rico, 2019. "Determinants of Land Use/Cover Change in the Iberian Peninsula (1990–2012) at Municipal Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evan Girvetz & Chris Zganjar, 2014. "Dissecting indices of aridity for assessing the impacts of global climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 469-483, October.
    2. Hagos, Fitsum & Makombe, Godswill & Namara, Regassa & Awulachew, Seleshi Bekele, 2008. "Importance of irrigated agriculture to the Ethiopian economy: capturing the direct net benefits of irrigation," Conference Papers h044133, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Gebregziabher, Gebrehaweria & Rebelo, Lisa-Maria & Notenbaert, A. & Ergano, K. & Abebe, Yenenesh, 2013. "Determinants of adoption of rainwater management technologies among farm households in the Nile River Basin," IWMI Reports 201008, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Daniel García-Galindo & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Fernando Cay Villa-Ceballos, 2019. "Building Variable Productivity Ratios for Improving Large Scale Spatially Explicit Pruning Biomass Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Richard Ackermann, 2012. "New Directions for Water Management in Indian Agriculture," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 4(2), pages 227-288, May.
    6. Giuseppe Badagliacca & Maurizio Romeo & Emilio Lo Presti & Antonio Gelsomino & Michele Monti, 2020. "Factors Governing Total and Permanganate Oxidizable C Pools in Agricultural Soils from Southern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Stefano Biagetti & Debora Zurro & Jonas Alcaina-Mateos & Eugenio Bortolini & Marco Madella, 2021. "Quantitative Analysis of Drought Management Strategies across Ethnographically-Researched African Societies: A Pilot Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Jalal Kassout & Jean-Frederic Terral & John G Hodgson & Mohammed Ater, 2019. "Trait-based plant ecology a flawed tool in climate studies? The leaf traits of wild olive that pattern with climate are not those routinely measured," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Sanju John Thomas & Mukund Haribhau Bade & Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo & Sheffy Thomas & Ajith Kumar & Mohamed M. Awad, 2022. "Urban Water Management with a Full Cost Recovery Policy: The Impact of Externalities on Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Arii, Ken & Caspersen, John P. & Jones, Trevor A. & Thomas, Sean C., 2008. "A selection harvesting algorithm for use in spatially explicit individual-based forest simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 251-266.
    11. Frank Davenport, 2017. "Estimating standard errors in spatial panel models with time varying spatial correlation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 155-177, March.
    12. Leandro, Camila & Jay-Robert, Pierre & Mériguet, Bruno & Houard, Xavier & Renner, Ian W., 2020. "Is my sdm good enough? insights from a citizen science dataset in a point process modeling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    13. Vijay Rajagopal & Gregory Bass & Cameron G Walker & David J Crossman & Amorita Petzer & Anthony Hickey & Ivo Siekmann & Masahiko Hoshijima & Mark H Ellisman & Edmund J Crampin & Christian Soeller, 2015. "Examination of the Effects of Heterogeneous Organization of RyR Clusters, Myofibrils and Mitochondria on Ca2+ Release Patterns in Cardiomyocytes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, September.
    14. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Abdollah Jalilian, 2017. "Modelling and classification of species abundance: a case study in the Barro Colorado Island plot," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2401-2409, October.
    16. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.
    17. Davies, Tilman M. & Jones, Khair & Hazelton, Martin L., 2016. "Symmetric adaptive smoothing regimens for estimation of the spatial relative risk function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 12-28.
    18. Sillero, Neftalí & Campos, João Carlos & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2023. "A curated list of R packages for ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    19. Martín, Gerardo & Yáñez-Arenas, Carlos & Chiappa-Carrara, Xavier, 2022. "Discrepancies between point process models and environmental envelopes identify the niche centroid – geography configuration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    20. Roger S. Bivand, 2021. "Progress in the R ecosystem for representing and handling spatial data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 515-546, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:166-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.