IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13606-d948710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Investment Decision and Coordination in a Retailer-Dominated Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Shizhen Bai

    (School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

  • Yonggan Wang

    (School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

Abstract

With the sustainable development of the global economy, environmental problems and the green economy are increasingly becoming points of concern for the community. However, the large amount of capital invested in green technology and the high price of green products have become the key problems hindering the development of a risk-averse green supply chain. In order to promote the supply chain to increase green investment level, improve the green degree of products, and reduce the impact of risk aversion on green investment, this paper studies a two-echelon green supply chain composed of a risk-averse manufacturer and a risk-neutral retailer, in which the retailer is the leader and the manufacturer is the follower. We construct the wholesale price contract model, cost-sharing contract model, and two-part contract model, respectively, and use the Optimization Theory and Methods to discuss the impact of the three contracts on the green degree, expected utility of supply chain, retail price, consumer surplus, and social welfare. The results show that in the cost-sharing contract, compared with the wholesale price contract, the green degree of the product has been significantly improved, but the expected utility of the supply chain enterprises cannot achieve Pareto improvement, and the higher consumer environmental awareness will cause the manufacturer’s expected utility to decline. In the two-part tariff contract, compared with the wholesale price contract, the expected utility of supply chain enterprises achieves Pareto improvement, and the green degree of products is the highest in the three contracts; more importantly, in the two-part contract, the product green degree, the retail price, and the expected utility of the supply chain are not related to the manufacturer’s risk aversion; meanwhile, the retail price in the two-part tariff is the lowest among the three contracts, and the consumer surplus and social welfare are the highest. Our main contribution is that the two-part contract eliminates the influence of the manufacturer’s risk aversion on the above decision variable and realizes the unification of manufacturers, retailers, consumers, and social benefits. Finally, this paper uses numerical examples to verify the above conclusions and then analyzes the sensitivity of the supply chain system.

Suggested Citation

  • Shizhen Bai & Yonggan Wang, 2022. "Green Investment Decision and Coordination in a Retailer-Dominated Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13606-:d:948710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simeng Wang & Yongsheng Cheng & Xiaoxian Zhang & Chenchen Zhu, 2020. "The Implications of Vertical Strategic Interaction on Green Technology Investment in a Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong, 2019. "Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 155-166.
    3. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2012. "A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 568-583.
    4. Cong Wang & Zongbao Zou & Shidao Geng, 2021. "Green Technology Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Niu, Baozhuang & Mu, Zihao & Li, Baixun, 2019. "O2O results in traffic congestion reduction and sustainability improvement: Analysis of “Online-to-Store” channel and uniform pricing strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 481-505.
    6. Zheng Liu & Qi Xu & Kun Yang, 2018. "Optimal Independent Pricing Strategies of Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Risk-Aversion Attitudes," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(02), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Bian, Junsong & Zhang, Guoqing & Zhou, Guanghui, 2020. "Manufacturer vs. Consumer Subsidy with Green Technology Investment and Environmental Concern," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 832-843.
    8. Fan, Yinghua & Feng, Yi & Shou, Yongyi, 2020. "A risk-averse and buyer-led supply chain under option contract: CVaR minimization and channel coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 66-81.
    9. Han Zhao & Shiji Song & Yuli Zhang & Jatinder N. D. Gupta & Anna G. Devlin & Raymond Chiong, 2019. "Supply Chain Coordination with a Risk-Averse Retailer and a Combined Buy-Back and Revenue Sharing Contract," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Liyan Wang & Minghai Ye & Shanshan Ma & Yipeng Sha, 2019. "Pricing and Coordination Strategy in a Green Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, December.
    11. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Talan, Gaurav & Jain, Mansi, 2021. "Revisiting the sustainable versus conventional investment dilemma in COVID-19 times," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Xiao, Tiaojun & Yang, Danqin, 2008. "Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 187-200, July.
    13. Haresh Gurnani & Murat Erkoc, 2008. "Supply contracts in manufacturer‐retailer interactions with manufacturer‐quality and retailer effort‐induced demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 200-217, April.
    14. Larissa Batrancea & Mircea Iosif Rus & Ema Speranta Masca & Ioan Dan Morar, 2021. "Fiscal Pressure as a Trigger of Financial Performance for the Energy Industry: An Empirical Investigation across a 16-Year Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.
    16. Wang, Limin & Song, Qiankun, 2020. "Pricing policies for dual-channel supply chain with green investment and sales effort under uncertain demand," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 79-93.
    17. Junjie Ma & Wenchao Yu & Shuxia Li & Linghong Zhang & Shaobin Zang & Wei Zhang, 2021. "The Green Product’s Pricing Strategy in a Dual Channel considering Manufacturer’s Risk Attitude," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, July.
    18. Weisheng Deng & Lu Liu, 2019. "Comparison of Carbon Emission Reduction Modes: Impacts of Capital Constraint and Risk Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    19. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    20. Larissa Batrancea & Malar Mozhi Rathnaswamy & Ioan Batrancea, 2021. "A Panel Data Analysis of Economic Growth Determinants in 34 African Countries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    21. Haixiang Wu & Bing Xu & Ding Zhang, 2019. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model with Subsidy on Green Supply Chain Technology Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-26, August.
    22. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongbo Guo & Mengtong Lu & Lili Ding, 2022. "The Effect of Consumer Sentiment on Manufacturers’ Green Technology Innovation: A RDEU Evolutionary Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Lingxiang Jian & Shuxuan Guo & Shengqing Yu, 2023. "Effect of Artificial Intelligence on the Development of China’s Wholesale and Retail Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Muhammad Babar Shahzad & Imran Bashir Dar & Raniyah Wazirali, 2023. "The Fear of the Known and Unknown in Being the Sustainable Business: Environmental Concern Reflected by Axfood (Sweden)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-9, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Guo & Wu, Huamin & Sethi, Suresh P. & Zhang, Xiang, 2021. "Contracting green product supply chains considering marketing efforts in the circular economy era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Ren, Da & Guo, Rui & Lan, Yanfei & Shang, Changjing, 2021. "Shareholding strategies for selling green products on online platforms in a two-echelon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun & Yuyan Wang & Shuiye Niu, 2021. "Optimal Pricing and Green Product Design Strategies in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Government Subsidy and Different Channel Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Liu, Samuel Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Ma, Benedict Jun & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Competition between green and non-green products in the blockchain era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Jin, Minyue & Zhang, Xueqing & Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu, 2021. "Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 131-139.
    6. Chenbo Zhu & Juntian Yue & Jing Chen, 2022. "Green Product Development and Order Strategies for Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Limin Su & Yongchao Cao & Wenjuan Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Operation Decisions and Coordination Strategies Considering the Consumers’ Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida, 2021. "Dynamic decision making in a mixed market under cooperation: Towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Chirantan Mondal & Bibhas C. Giri, 2022. "Analyzing a manufacturer-retailer sustainable supply chain under cap-and-trade policy and revenue sharing contract," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4057-4092, September.
    10. Xia, Jing & Niu, Wenju & Chen, Xiaolin & Zhang, Lianmin, 2023. "Investing in a shared supplier to encourage environmental responsibility under spillovers and demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Abhijit Barman & Rubi Das & Pijus Kanti De & Shib Sankar Sana, 2021. "Optimal Pricing and Greening Strategy in a Competitive Green Supply Chain: Impact of Government Subsidy and Tax Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Izabela Nielsen & Sani Majumder & Eryk Szwarc & Subrata Saha, 2020. "Impact of Strategic Cooperation under Competition on Green Product Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun & Tongtong Yao, 2022. "Incentive Mechanisms for Carbon Emission Abatement Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Awasthy, Prakash & Gouda, Sirish & Ghosh, Debabrata & Swami, Sanjeev, 2022. "Analyzing product greening spillovers in multi-product markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    15. Xiong Gao & Yuhong Wang, 2019. "Study on Benefit Coordination of Supply Chain Network Based on Green Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Subrata Saha & Zbigniew Banaszak & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Izabela Ewa Nielsen, 2022. "Pricing and quality competition for substitutable green products with a common retailer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3713-3746, September.
    17. Shengliang Zong & Chunyang Shen & Siping Su, 2022. "Decision Making in Green Supply Chain with Manufacturers’ Misreporting Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Jun Wang & Qian Zhang & Xinman Lu & Rui Ma & Baoqin Yu & Huming Gao, 2022. "Emission reduction and coordination of a dynamic supply chain with green reputation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3945-3988, September.
    19. Ratul Lahkar & Vinay Ramani, 2020. "Can incomplete information lead to better social outcomes?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 771-783, July.
    20. Syed Asif Raza, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of pricing models in supply chain," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 228-251, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13606-:d:948710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.