IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12860-d936920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Learning Analysis for Reviews in Arabic E-Commerce Sites to Detect Consumer Behavior towards Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Nada Ali Hakami

    (Department of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Jazan University, Jazan P.O. Box 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hanan A. Hosni Mahmoud

    (Department of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh P.O. Box 84428, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Recently, online e-commerce has developed a major method for customers to buy various merchandise. Deep learning analysis of online customer reviews can detect consumer behavior towards sustainability. Artificial intelligence can obtain insights from product reviews to design sustainable products. A key challenge is that many sustainable products do not seem to fulfill consumers’ expectations due to the gap between consumers’ expectations and their knowledge of sustainable products. This article proposes a new deep learning model using dataset analysis and a neural computing dual attention model (DL-DA). The DL-DA model employs lexical analysis and deep learning methodology. The lexical analysis can detect lexical features in the customer reviews that emphasize sustainability. Then, the deep learning model extracts the main lexical and context features from the customer reviews. The deep learning model can predict customers’ repurchase habits concerning products that favor sustainability. This research collected data by crawling Arabic e-commerce websites for training and testing. The size of the collected dataset is about 323,150 customer reviews. The experimental results depict that the proposed model can efficiently enhance the accuracy of text lexical analysis. The proposed model achieves accuracy of 96.5% with an F1-score of 96.1%. We also compared the proposed model with state of the art models, where our model enhances both accuracy and sensitivity metrics by more than 5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Nada Ali Hakami & Hanan A. Hosni Mahmoud, 2022. "Deep Learning Analysis for Reviews in Arabic E-Commerce Sites to Detect Consumer Behavior towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12860-:d:936920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diya Zhang & Jiake Leng & Xianju Li & Wenxi He & Weitao Chen, 2022. "Three-Stream and Double Attention-Based DenseNet-BiLSTM for Fine Land Cover Classification of Complex Mining Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Amjad Iqbal & Rashid Amin & Javed Iqbal & Roobaea Alroobaea & Ahmed Binmahfoudh & Mudassar Hussain, 2022. "Sentiment Analysis of Consumer Reviews Using Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Michael Luca & Georgios Zervas, 2016. "Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Competition, and Yelp Review Fraud," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3412-3427, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    2. Gary Bolton & Kevin Breuer & Ben Greiner & Axel Ockenfels, 2023. "Fixing feedback revision rules in online markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 247-256, April.
    3. Dara Lee Luca & Michael Luca, 2019. "Survival of the Fittest: The Impact of the Minimum Wage on Firm Exit," NBER Working Papers 25806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Sungsik Park & Woochoel Shin & Jinhong Xie, 2021. "The Fateful First Consumer Review," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 481-507, May.
    5. Lingfang (Ivy) Li & Steven Tadelis & Xiaolan Zhou, 2020. "Buying reputation as a signal of quality: Evidence from an online marketplace," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 965-988, December.
    6. Plé, Loïc & Demangeot, Catherine, 2020. "Social contagion of online and offline deviant behaviors and its value outcomes: The case of tourism ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 886-896.
    7. Pei-Yu Chen & Yili Hong & Ying Liu, 2018. "The Value of Multidimensional Rating Systems: Evidence from a Natural Experiment and Randomized Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4629-4647, October.
    8. Gesche, Tobias, 2018. "Reference Price Shifts and Customer Antagonism: Evidence from Reviews for Online Auctions," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181650, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    10. Tim Kollmer & Andreas Eckhardt, 2023. "Dark Patterns," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(2), pages 201-208, April.
    11. Zhuang, Mengzhou & Cui, Geng & Peng, Ling, 2018. "Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 24-35.
    12. Erfan Rezvani & Christian Rojas, 2022. "Firm responsiveness to consumers' reviews: The effect on online reputation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 898-922, November.
    13. Meoli, Michele & Vismara, Silvio, 2021. "Information manipulation in equity crowdfunding markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Dominik Gutt & Philipp Herrmann & Mohammad S. Rahman, 2018. "Crowd-Driven Competitive Intelligence: Understanding the Relationship Between Local Market Competition and Online Rating Distributions," Working Papers Dissertations 41, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    15. Weijia (Daisy) Dai & Ginger Jin & Jungmin Lee & Michael Luca, 2018. "Aggregation of consumer ratings: an application to Yelp.com," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 289-339, September.
    16. Apostolos Filippas & John J. Horton & Richard J. Zeckhauser, 2020. "Owning, Using, and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the “Sharing Economy”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4152-4172, September.
    17. Soon Goo Hong & DonHee Lee, 2023. "Development of a citizen participation public service innovation model based on smart governance," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(3), pages 669-694, September.
    18. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Kumar, Ajay & Lu Wang, Cheng & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "Impacts of consumer cognitive process to ascertain online fake review: A cognitive dissonance theory approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Vollaard, Ben & van Ours, Jan C., 2022. "Bias in expert product reviews," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 105-118.
    20. Hung-Pin Shih & Pei-Chen Sung, 2021. "Addressing the Review-Based Learning and Private Information Approaches to Foster Platform Continuance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 649-661, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12860-:d:936920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.