IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11538-d914883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Moisture Measuring Techniques and Factors Affecting the Moisture Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Waseem Rasheed

    (Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610229, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Jialiang Tang

    (Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610229, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Abid Sarwar

    (Department of Irrigation & Drainage, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Suraj Shah

    (College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China)

  • Naeem Saddique

    (Department of Irrigation & Drainage, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Usman Khan

    (Department of Energy Systems Engineering, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Imran Khan

    (Department of Irrigation & Drainage, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Shah Nawaz

    (Institute of Soil and Environmental Science, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Redmond R. Shamshiri

    (Department of Engineering for Crop Production, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy, 14469 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Marjan Aziz

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Barani Agricultural Research Institute, Chakwal 48800, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Sultan

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

Abstract

The amount of surface soil moisture (SSM) is a crucial ecohydrological natural resource that regulates important land surface processes. It affects critical land–atmospheric phenomena, including the division of energy and water (infiltration, runoff, and evaporation), that impacts the effectiveness of agricultural output (sensible and latent heat fluxes and surface air temperature). Despite its significance, there are several difficulties in making precise measurements, monitoring, and interpreting SSM at high spatial and temporal resolutions. The current study critically reviews the methods and procedures for calculating SSM and the variables influencing measurement accuracy and applicability under different fields, climates, and operational conditions. For laboratory and field measurements, this study divides SSM estimate strategies into (i) direct and (ii) indirect procedures. The accuracy and applicability of a technique depends on the environment and the resources at hand. Comparative research is geographically restricted, although precise and economical—direct measuring techniques like the gravimetric method are time-consuming and destructive. In contrast, indirect methods are more expensive and do not produce measurements at the spatial scale but produce precise data on a temporal scale. While measuring SSM across more significant regions, ground-penetrating radar and remote sensing methods are susceptible to errors caused by overlapping data and atmospheric factors. On the other hand, soft computing techniques like machine/deep learning are quite handy for estimating SSM without any technical or laborious procedures. We determine that factors, e.g., topography, soil type, vegetation, climate change, groundwater level, depth of soil, etc., primarily influence the SSM measurements. Different techniques have been put into practice for various practical situations, although comparisons between them are not available frequently in publications. Each method offers a unique set of potential advantages and disadvantages. The most accurate way of identifying the best soil moisture technique is the value selection method (VSM). The neutron probe is preferable to the FDR or TDR sensor for measuring soil moisture. Remote sensing techniques have filled the need for large-scale, highly spatiotemporal soil moisture monitoring. Through self-learning capabilities in data-scarce areas, machine/deep learning approaches facilitate soil moisture measurement and prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Waseem Rasheed & Jialiang Tang & Abid Sarwar & Suraj Shah & Naeem Saddique & Muhammad Usman Khan & Muhammad Imran Khan & Shah Nawaz & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Marjan Aziz & Muhammad Sultan, 2022. "Soil Moisture Measuring Techniques and Factors Affecting the Moisture Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11538-:d:914883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarwar, Abid & Peters, R. Troy & Mehanna, Hani & Amini, Mohamma Zaman & Mohamed, Abdelmoneim Zakaria, 2019. "Evaluating water application efficiency of low and mid elevation spray application under changing weather conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 84-91.
    2. Xinxin Guo & Qiang Fu & Yanhong Hang & He Lu & Fengjie Gao & Jingbo Si, 2020. "Spatial Variability of Soil Moisture in Relation to Land Use Types and Topographic Features on Hillslopes in the Black Soil (Mollisols) Area of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Luca Stevanato & Gabriele Baroni & Yafit Cohen & Cristiano Lino Fontana & Simone Gatto & Marcello Lunardon & Francesco Marinello & Sandra Moretto & Luca Morselli, 2019. "A Novel Cosmic-Ray Neutron Sensor for Soil Moisture Estimation over Large Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Munyasya, Alex Ndolo & Koskei, Kiprotich & Zhou, Rui & Liu, Shu-Tong & Indoshi, Sylvia Ngaira & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Xu-Cheng & Cheruiyot, Wesly Kiprotich & Mburu, David Mwehia & Nyende, Aggrey Bernard , 2022. "Integrated on-site & off-site rainwater-harvesting system boosts rainfed maize production for better adaptation to climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Christian P. Giardina & Michael G. Ryan, 2000. "Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6780), pages 858-861, April.
    6. Sarwar, Abid & Peters, R. Troy & Shafeeque, Muhammad & Mohamed, Abdelmoneim & Arshad, Arfan & Ullah, Ikram & Saddique, Naeem & Muzammil, Muhammad & Aslam, Rana Ammar, 2021. "Accurate measurement of wind drift and evaporation losses could improve water application efficiency of sprinkler irrigation systems − A comparison of measuring techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belén Cárceles Rodríguez & Víctor Hugo Durán Zuazo & Dionisio Franco Tarifa & Simón Cuadros Tavira & Pedro Cermeño Sacristan & Iván Francisco García-Tejero, 2023. "Irrigation Alternatives for Avocado ( Persea americana Mill.) in the Mediterranean Subtropical Region in the Context of Climate Change: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haijun Liu & Jie Chang & Xiaopei Tang & Jinping Zhang, 2022. "In Situ Measurement of Stemflow, Throughfall and Canopy Interception of Sprinkler Irrigation Water in a Wheat Field," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Mattar, Mohamed A. & Roy, Dilip Kumar & Al-Ghobari, Hussein M. & Dewidar, Ahmed Z., 2022. "Machine learning and regression-based techniques for predicting sprinkler irrigation's wind drift and evaporation losses," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    3. Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Helen Ding & Sonja Teelucksingh, 2010. "European Forests and Carbon Sequestration Services: An Economic Assessment of Climate Change Impacts," Working Papers 2010.10, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Post, Joachim & Krysanova, Valentina & Suckow, Felicitas & Mirschel, Wilfried & Rogasik, Jutta & Merbach, Ines, 2007. "Integrated eco-hydrological modelling of soil organic matter dynamics for the assessment of environmental change impacts in meso- to macro-scale river basins," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 93-109.
    5. Wenting Huang & Long Guo & Ting Zhang & Ting Chen & Longqian Chen & Long Li & Xundi Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Territorial Spatial Transformation on Carbon Storage: A Case Study of Suqian, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Nguyen Duc Luong & Nguyen Hoang Hiep & Thi Hieu Bui, 2021. "Investigating the Spatio-Temporal Variation of Soil Moisture and Agricultural Drought towards Supporting Water Resources Management in the Red River Basin of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Yingxue Li & Zhaoshun Liu & Shujie Li & Xiang Li, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis of Land Use and Carbon Storage Changes in Changchun City Based on FLUS and InVEST Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Daiji Wan & Jiping Liu & Dandan Zhao, 2023. "Assessment of Carbon Storage under Different SSP-RCP Scenarios in Terrestrial Ecosystems of Jilin Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Bo Chen & Meiqi Zhang & Rui Yang & Wenling Tang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variations in the Carbon Sequestration Capacity of Plateau Lake Wetlands Regulated by Land Use Control under Policy Guidance," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Mohammad Saadat & Seyd Teymoor Seydi & Mahdi Hasanlou & Saeid Homayouni, 2022. "A Convolutional Neural Network Method for Rice Mapping Using Time-Series of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Smyth, C.E. & Kurz, W.A. & Trofymow, J.A., 2011. "Including the effects of water stress on decomposition in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1080-1091.
    12. Younsuk Dong & Steve Miller & Lyndon Kelley, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of Soil Moisture Sensors in Coarse- and Fine-Textured Michigan Agricultural Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Qian, Long & Meng, Huayue & Chen, Xiaohong & Tang, Rong, 2023. "Evaluating agricultural drought and flood abrupt alternation: A case study of cotton in the middle-and-lower Yangtze River, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    14. Tinghui Wu & Jian Yu & Jingxia Lu & Xiuguo Zou & Wentian Zhang, 2020. "Research on Inversion Model of Cultivated Soil Moisture Content Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Theophilus Atio Abalori & Wenxia Cao & Conrad Atogi-Akwoa Weobong & Wen Li & Shilin Wang & Xiuxia Deng, 2022. "Spatial Vegetation Patch Patterns and Their Relation to Environmental Factors in the Alpine Grasslands of the Qilian Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Jinfeng Wang & Lingfeng Li & Qing Li & Sheng Wang & Xiaoling Liu & Ya Li, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage in the Yellow River Basin Based on the Major Function-Oriented Zone Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Fengjie Gao & Wei Yang & Si Zhang & Xiaohui Xin & Jun Zhou & Guoming Du, 2023. "An Integrated Approach to Constructing Ecological Security Pattern in an Urbanization and Agricultural Intensification Area in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Long Li & Wei Fu & Mingcan Luo, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variation and Prediction of Ecosystem Carbon Stocks in Yunnan Province Based on Land Use Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Wang, Wendi & Straffelini, Eugenio & Tarolli, Paolo, 2023. "Steep-slope viticulture: The effectiveness of micro-water storage in improving the resilience to weather extremes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    20. Yimin Li & Xue Yang & Bowen Wu & Juanzhen Zhao & Xuanlun Deng, 2023. "Impervious Surface Mapping Based on Remote Sensing and an Optimized Coupled Model: The Dianchi Basin as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11538-:d:914883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.