IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2001-d1765632.html

Study on Carbon Storage Evolution and Scenario Response Under Multi-Pathway Drivers in High-Groundwater-Level Coal Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Three Cities in Shandong, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yulong Geng

    (School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhenqi Hu

    (School of Environment Science & Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Weihua Guo

    (School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Anya Zhong

    (School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Quanzhi Li

    (School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Land use/land cover (LULC) change is a key driving factor influencing the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage. In high-groundwater-level coal resource-based cities (HGCRBCs), the interplay of urban expansion, mining disturbances, and land reclamation makes the carbon storage evolution process more complex. This study takes Jining, Zaozhuang, and Heze cities in Shandong Province as the research area and constructs a coupled analytical framework of “mining–reclamation–carbon storage” by integrating the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS), Probability Integral Method (PIM), InVEST, and Grey Multi-Objective Programming (GMOP) models. It systematically evaluates the spatiotemporal characteristics of carbon storage changes from 2000 to 2020 and simulates the carbon storage responses under different development scenarios in 2030. The results show that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the total carbon storage in the region decreased by 31.53 Tg, with cropland conversion to construction land and water bodies being the primary carbon loss pathways, contributing up to 89.86% of the total carbon loss. (2) Among the 16 major LULC transition paths identified, single-process drivers dominated carbon storage changes. Specifically, urban expansion and mining activities individually accounted for nearly 70% and 8.65% of the carbon loss, respectively. Although the reclamation path contributed to a recovery of 1.72 Tg of carbon storage, it could not fully offset the loss caused by mining. (3) Future scenario simulations indicate that the ecological conservation scenario yields the highest carbon storage, while the economic development scenario results in the lowest. Mining activities generally lead to approximately 3.5 Tg of carbon loss, while post-mining reclamation can restore about 72% of the loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulong Geng & Zhenqi Hu & Weihua Guo & Anya Zhong & Quanzhi Li, 2025. "Study on Carbon Storage Evolution and Scenario Response Under Multi-Pathway Drivers in High-Groundwater-Level Coal Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Three Cities in Shandong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2001-:d:1765632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shenli Zhou & Xiaokai Li & Pengcheng Zhang & Gang Lu & Xiaolong Zhang & Huaqing Zhang & Faming Zhang, 2024. "Carbon Sequestration Capacity after Ecological Restoration of Open-Pit Mines: A Case Study in Yangtze River Basin, Jurong City, Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Christian P. Giardina & Michael G. Ryan, 2000. "Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6780), pages 858-861, April.
    3. Katarzyna B. Tokarska & Nathan P. Gillett, 2018. "Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 °C global warming," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 296-299, April.
    4. Zhen Wang & Anya Zhong & Quanzhi Li, 2024. "Optimization of Land Use Structure Based on the Coupling of GMOP and PLUS Models: A Case Study of Lvliang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Xiao, Wu & Fu, Yanhua & Wang, Tao & Lv, Xuejiao, 2018. "Effects of land use transitions due to underground coal mining on ecosystem services in high groundwater table areas: A case study in the Yanzhou coalfield," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 213-221.
    6. Ning He & Wenxian Guo & Hongxiang Wang & Long Yu & Siyuan Cheng & Lintong Huang & Xuyang Jiao & Wenxiong Chen & Haotong Zhou, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Variations in Landscape Habitat Quality under Multiple Land-Use/Land-Cover Scenarios Based on the PLUS-InVEST Model in the Yangtze River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingyi Zhang & Hanqi Ding & Jingkun Xu & Bohong Zheng, 2024. "A Simulation-Based Prediction of Land Use Change Impacts on Carbon Storage from a Regional Imbalance Perspective: A Case Study of Hunan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Ma, Jiakai & Hao, Zixuan & Shen, Yaqi & Zhen, Zhilei, 2025. "Spatial-temporal evolution of carbon storage and its driving factors in the Shanxi section of the Yellow River Basin, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 502(C).
    3. Aibo Jin & Gachen Zhang & Ping Ma & Xiangrong Wang, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in the Chaohu Lake Basin Based on Land-Use Scenario Simulations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Jiaqi Kang & Linlin Zhang & Qingyan Meng & Hantian Wu & Junyan Hou & Jing Pan & Jiahao Wu, 2025. "Land Use and Carbon Storage Evolution Under Multiple Scenarios: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Beijing Using the PLUS-InVEST Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Chuntian Pan & Jun Wen & Jianing Ma, 2024. "Temporal and Spatial Variation in Habitat Quality in Guangxi Based on PLUS-InVEST Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Ding, Helen & Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. & Teelucksingh, Sonja S., 2010. "European Forests and Carbon Sequestration Services: An Economic Assessment of Climate Change Impacts," Sustainable Development Papers 59397, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    7. Lili Du & Yunbing Hou & Shuheng Zhong & Kai Qu, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration in Coal Mining Areas with a High Groundwater Table Based on Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Xiaotong Wang & Jiazheng Han & Jian Lin, 2022. "Response of Land Use and Net Primary Productivity to Coal Mining: A Case Study of Huainan City and Its Mining Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Kun Zhang & Yu Wang & Ali Mamtimin & Yongqiang Liu & Lifang Zhang & Jiacheng Gao & Ailiyaer Aihaiti & Cong Wen & Meiqi Song & Fan Yang & Chenglong Zhou & Wen Huo, 2024. "Simulation and Attribution Analysis of Spatial–Temporal Variation in Carbon Storage in the Northern Slope Economic Belt of Tianshan Mountains, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Chaokui Huang & Yueping Wu & Shaohui Yang & Faming Zhang & Xiaokai Li & Huaqing Zhang & Xiaolong Zhang, 2025. "Establishment and Application of Biomass Model for Vegetation Condition Assessment After Ecological Restoration—Yixing Quarry Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Yi Wang & Jun Wang & Beibei Hao & Siyi Zhang & Junwei Ding & Bin He, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Future Land Use in the Beijiang River Basin Under Multidimensional Ecological Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Yimin Li & Xue Yang & Bowen Wu & Juanzhen Zhao & Xuanlun Deng, 2023. "Impervious Surface Mapping Based on Remote Sensing and an Optimized Coupled Model: The Dianchi Basin as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Feng Tang & Xu Zhou & Li Wang & Yangjian Zhang & Meichen Fu & Pengtao Zhang, 2021. "Linking Ecosystem Service and MSPA to Construct Landscape Ecological Network of the Huaiyang Section of the Grand Canal," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Yang Chen & Zhenqi Hu & Pengyu Li & Gensheng Li & Dongzhu Yuan & Jiaxin Guo, 2022. "Assessment and Effect of Mining Subsidence on Farmland in Coal–Crop Overlapped Areas: A Case of Shandong Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Hu, Zhenqi & Li, Gensheng & Xia, Jianan & Feng, Zhanjie & Han, Jiazheng & Chen, Zanxu & Wang, Wenjuan & Li, Guodong, 2023. "Coupling of underground coal mining and mine reclamation for farmland protection and sustainable mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Yang Ou & Christopher Roney & Jameel Alsalam & Katherine Calvin & Jared Creason & Jae Edmonds & Allen A. Fawcett & Page Kyle & Kanishka Narayan & Patrick O’Rourke & Pralit Patel & Shaun Ragnauth & Ste, 2021. "Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Muhammad Waseem Rasheed & Jialiang Tang & Abid Sarwar & Suraj Shah & Naeem Saddique & Muhammad Usman Khan & Muhammad Imran Khan & Shah Nawaz & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Marjan Aziz & Muhammad Sultan, 2022. "Soil Moisture Measuring Techniques and Factors Affecting the Moisture Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Post, Joachim & Krysanova, Valentina & Suckow, Felicitas & Mirschel, Wilfried & Rogasik, Jutta & Merbach, Ines, 2007. "Integrated eco-hydrological modelling of soil organic matter dynamics for the assessment of environmental change impacts in meso- to macro-scale river basins," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 93-109.
    19. Xiongwen Chen & Wilfred Post & Richard Norby & Aimée Classen, 2011. "Modeling soil respiration and variations in source components using a multi-factor global climate change experiment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 459-480, August.
    20. Yan-Jie Gu & Cheng-Long Han & Meng Kong & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Feng-Min Li, 2022. "Film Mulching with Low Phosphorus Application Improves Soil Organic Carbon and Its Decomposability in a Semiarid Agroecosystem," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2001-:d:1765632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.