IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11078-d907008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Economy, Technological Innovation and Green High-Quality Development of Industry: A Study Case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Liu

    (School of Business, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China)

  • Tao Ding

    (School of Business, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China)

  • Hao Wang

    (School of Business, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China)

Abstract

This research project investigates the direct and indirect influences of the digital economy in promoting the green high-quality development of industry. We analyze the baseline regression, spatial spillover effect, intermediary effect, and threshold effect of the digital economy and its technological innovation processes on the green high-quality development of industry in 31 provinces and cities in China during the period between 2012–2020. The results reveal that the digital economy generates a positive impact and nonlinear incremental character on the green high-quality development of industry, and technological innovation is the mediating factor of both. Digital economy and technological innovation have a threshold effect. When they cross the threshold value, the force will be strengthened. The econometric analysis of spatial spillover shows the green high-quality development of intra-regional and inter-regional industries is promoted by the digital economy. The dimension of regional differences in the analysis shows that the effect of the digital economy is not evident in the western region of China, while the impact is a lot more prominent in the eastern than in the middle area of the country. Study results provide measures of the green high-quality development of industry, such as the application of green scenarios, differential development, and collaborative development in the digital economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Liu & Tao Ding & Hao Wang, 2022. "Digital Economy, Technological Innovation and Green High-Quality Development of Industry: A Study Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11078-:d:907008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11078/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11078/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosa Bernardini Papalia & Silvia Bertarelli, 2013. "Nonlinearities in economic growth and club convergence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1171-1202, June.
    2. Dale Jorgenson & Mun Ho & Jon Samuels & Kevin Stiroh, 2007. "Industry Origins of the American Productivity Resurgence," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 229-252.
    3. Susanto Basu & John G. Fernald, 2008. "Information and communications technology as a general purpose technology: evidence from U.S. industry data," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 1-15.
    4. Mercedes Delgado & Michael E. Porter & Scott Stern, 2016. "Defining clusters of related industries," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38.
    5. Costanza, Robert, 1989. "What is ecological economics?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, February.
    6. Walheer, Barnabé & He, Ming, 2020. "Technical efficiency and technology gap of the manufacturing industry in China: Does firm ownership matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Verhoef, Erik T. & Nijkamp, Peter, 2002. "Externalities in urban sustainability: Environmental versus localization-type agglomeration externalities in a general spatial equilibrium model of a single-sector monocentric industrial city," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 157-179, February.
    8. Joaquín Ordieres-Meré & Tomás Prieto Remón & Jesús Rubio, 2020. "Digitalization: An Opportunity for Contributing to Sustainability From Knowledge Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Pil Sun Heo & Duk Hee Lee, 2019. "Evolution of the linkage structure of ICT industry and its role in the economic system: the case of Korea," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 424-454, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "Digital green value co-creation behavior, digital green network embedding and digital green innovation performance: moderating effects of digital green network fragmentation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Weiwei Zhang & Shengqiang Zhang & Lan Bo & Mahfuzul Haque & Enru Liu, 2023. "Does China’s Regional Digital Economy Promote the Development of a Green Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Jie Li & Zhengchuan Sun & Jie Zhou & Yaya Sow & Xufeng Cui & Haipeng Chen & Qianling Shen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Carbon Emissions from Cultivated Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Tonggong Zhang & Zhe Ma & Yingshi Shang, 2023. "Higher Education, Technological Innovation, and Green Development—Analysis Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Liu & Tingting Gu & Hao Wang, 2022. "The Coupling Coordination between Digital Economy and Industrial Green High-Quality Development: Spatio-Temporal Characteristics, Differences and Convergence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Guoge Yang & Feng Deng & Yifei Wang & Xianhong Xiang, 2022. "Digital Paradox: Platform Economy and High-Quality Economic Development—New Evidence from Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Kim, Keungoui & Bounfour, Ahmed & Nonnis, Alberto & Özaygen, Altay, 2021. "Measuring ICT externalities and their contribution to productivity: A bilateral trade based approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    4. Strohmaier, R. & Rainer, A., 2016. "Studying general purpose technologies in a multi-sector framework: The case of ICT in Denmark," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 34-49.
    5. Ma, Dan & Zhu, Qing, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 801-813.
    6. Oliner, Stephen D. & Sichel, Daniel E. & Stiroh, Kevin J., 2008. "Explaining a productive decade," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 633-673.
    7. Strohmaier, Rita & Rainer, Andreas, 2013. "On the Eonomic Purpose of General Purpose Technologies: A Combined Classical and Evolutionary Framework," MPRA Paper 45964, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Emil Velinov & Milan Maly & Yelena Petrenko & Igor Denisov & Vasko Vassilev, 2020. "The Role of Top Management Team Digitalization and Firm Internationalization for Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-11, November.
    9. Kariem Soliman, 2021. "Are Industrial Robots a new GPT? A Panel Study of Nine European Countries with Capital and Quality-adjusted Industrial Robots as Drivers of Labour Productivity Growth," EIIW Discussion paper disbei307, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    10. Hirte, Georg & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2018. "The impact of anti-congestion policies and the role of labor-supply margins," CEPIE Working Papers 04/18, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    11. Lei Ding & Xuejuan Fang, 2022. "Spatial–temporal distribution of air-pollution-intensive industries and its social-economic driving mechanism in Zhejiang Province, China: a framework of spatial econometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1681-1712, February.
    12. P. Guerrieri & M. Luciani & V. Meliciani, 2011. "The determinants of investment in information and communication technologies," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 387-403.
    13. Elstner, Steffen & Grimme, Christian & Kecht, Valentin & Lehmann, Robert, 2022. "The diffusion of technological progress in ICT," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Andrews, RJ & Fazio, Catherine & Guzman, Jorge & Liu, Yupeng & Stern, Scott, 2022. "The Startup Cartography Project: Measuring and mapping entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    15. Haochang Yang & Faming Zhang & Yixin He, 2021. "Exploring the effect of producer services and manufacturing industrial co-agglomeration on the ecological environment pollution control in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16119-16144, November.
    16. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    17. Sam Tavassoli & Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol & Pia Arenius, 2023. "Colocation of Entrepreneurs and New Firm Survival: Role of New Firm Founder’s Experiential Relatedness to Local Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1421-1459, July.
    18. Derya Fındık & Aysıt Tansel, 2013. "Intangible investment and Technical efficiency: The case of software-intensive manufacturing firms in Turkey," EY International Congress on Economics I (EYC2013), October 24-25, 2013, Ankara, Turkey 235, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.
    19. Davide Consoli & Francesco Vona & Francesco Rentocchini, 2016. "That was then, this is now: skills and routinization in the 2000s," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(5), pages 847-866.
    20. Zhou, Zhongsheng & Li, Zhuo, 2023. "Corporate digital transformation and trade credit financing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11078-:d:907008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.