IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10937-d904345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associated Factors of Pesticide Packaging Waste Recycling Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior in Chinese Fruit Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Yan

    (College of Biodiversity Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
    College of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Xue Zhao

    (College of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Dan Zhang

    (College of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Jian Deng

    (College of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Yuan Zhang

    (College of Biodiversity Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

Abstract

Pesticide packaging waste recycling is crucial in promoting the development of agricultural modernization and ensuring the safety of agricultural products, but, currently, studies on pesticide packaging waste recycling behavior at the farmer level are still scarce, especially from the perspective of social psychology and regulation paths. In the current study, we surveyed 198 farmers in Shaanxi Province, China. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to explore the associated factors of farmers’ pesticide waste packaging recycling behavior based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB). The results indicate that a degree of convenience and time spent affected recycling behavior. Attitude toward the behavior (AB) and subject norm (SN) showed significant associations with fruit farmers’ behavior intention (IN) in pesticide packaging waste recycling, while perceived behavior control (PBC) presented insignificant association. However, the direct association between PBC and fruit famers’ behavior in regards to pesticide packaging waste recycling was statistically significant. Our study’s results suggest that measures such as improving the policy system of pesticide packaging recycling and treatment, strengthening science popularization, publicity and guidance, standardizing pesticide packaging tips, carrying out pilot recycling programs, and improving infrastructures could be effective in promoting fruit farmers’ behavior in regards to the recycling of pesticide packaging waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Yan & Xue Zhao & Dan Zhang & Jian Deng & Yuan Zhang, 2022. "Associated Factors of Pesticide Packaging Waste Recycling Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior in Chinese Fruit Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10937-:d:904345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10937/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10937/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongpeng Guo & Fanhui Sun & Chulin Pan & Baiming Yang & Yin Li, 2021. "The Deviation of the Behaviors of Rice Farmers from Their Stated Willingness to Apply Biopesticides—A Study Carried Out in Jilin Province of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. David J. Pannell, 1991. "Pests and pesticides, risk and risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 361-383, August.
    3. Hofenk, Dianne & Pennings, Joost & Trujillo-Barrera, Andres, 2014. "Understanding producers’ motives to adopt sustainable practices: the role of expected rewards, risk perception, and risk tolerance," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182740, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Nadja Stadlinger & Aviti Mmochi & Sonja Dobo & Emma Gyllbäck & Linda Kumblad, 2011. "Pesticide use among smallholder rice farmers in Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 641-656, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingyue Li & Jingjing Wang & Kai Chen & Lianbei Wu, 2020. "Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers’ Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Jianhua Wang & May Chu & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Measuring Rice Farmer’s Pesticide Overuse Practice and the Determinants: A Statistical Analysis Based on Data Collected in Jiangsu and Anhui Provinces of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Kishor, Nalin M., 1992. "Pesticide externalities, comparative advantage, and commodity trade : cotton in Andhra Pradesh, India," Policy Research Working Paper Series 928, The World Bank.
    4. Carpentier, A. & Reboud, X., 2018. "Why farmers consider pesticides the ultimate in crop protection: economic and behavioral insights," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277528, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Dirksmeyer, W., 2008. "Ist eine Reduzierung des Pflanzenschutzmitteleinsatzes im Freilandgemüsebau möglich? Ergebnisse eines bioökonomischen Simulationsmodells," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    6. Mitchell, Paul D. & Hurley, Terrance M. & Babcock, Bruce A. & Hellmich, Richard L., 2002. "Insuring The Stewardship Of Bt Corn: 'A Carrot' Versus 'A Stick'," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Hasibuan, Abdul Muis & Gregg, Daniel & Stringer, Randy, 2022. "Risk preferences, intra-household dynamics and spatial effects on chemical inputs use: Case of small-scale citrus farmers in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Megan Sheahan & Christopher Barrett & Casey Goldvale, 2016. "Working Paper 234 - The Unintended Consequences of Agricultural Input Intensification: Human Health Implications of Agro-chemical use in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Paper Series 2329, African Development Bank.
    9. Geoffroy Enjolras & Magali Aubert, 2018. "Does crop insurance lead to better environmental practices? Evidence from French farms," Post-Print hal-02048349, HAL.
    10. Karagiannis, Giannis, 1999. "Proportional Profit Taxes And Resource Management Under Production Uncertainty," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Qiu, Xin & Jin, Jianjun & He, Rui & Mao, Jiansu, 2022. "The deviation between the willingness and behavior of farmers to adopt electricity-saving tricycles and its influencing factors in Dazu District of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Zhichao Li & Jilin Huang, 2018. "How to Effectively Improve Pesticide Waste Governance: A Perspective of Reverse Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Feng, Shuaizhang & Han, Yujie & Qiu, Huanguang, 2021. "Does crop insurance reduce pesticide usage? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    14. Magali Aubert & Geoffroy Enjolras, 2017. "Are EU subsidies a springboard to the reduction of pesticide use?," Post-Print hal-02733800, HAL.
    15. Niklas Möhring & Martina Bozzola & Stefan Hirsch & Robert Finger, 2020. "Are pesticides risk decreasing? The relevance of pesticide indicator choice in empirical analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 429-444, May.
    16. Cobourn, Kelly M. & Goodhue, Rachael E. & Williams, Jeffrey C., 2009. "The Role of Harvest Timing in Pest Management: Grower Response to Infestation by the California Olive Fruit Fly," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49475, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Siyu Gong & Bo Wang & Zhigang Yu, 2022. "Whether the Use of the Internet Can Assist Farmers in Selecting Biopesticides or Not: A Study Based on Evidence from the Largest Rice-Producing Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Archer, David W. & Shogren, Jason F., 1996. "Endogenous risk in weed control management," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 103-122, July.
    19. Rodrigo Gil & Carlos Ricardo Bojacá & Eddie Schrevens, 2017. "Uncertainty of the Agricultural Grey Water Footprint Based on High Resolution Primary Data," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3389-3400, September.
    20. Falconer, K. & Hodge, I., 2000. "Using economic incentives for pesticide usage reductions: responsiveness to input taxation and agricultural systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 175-194, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10937-:d:904345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.