IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8761-d865191.html

Geoprocessing Applied to the Assessment of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in a Brazilian Medium-Sized City

Author

Listed:
  • Norton Barros Felix

    (Military Institute of Engineering, Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Praia Vermelha, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil)

  • Priscila Celebrini de Oliveira Campos

    (Military Institute of Engineering, Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Praia Vermelha, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil)

  • Igor Paz

    (Military Institute of Engineering, Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Praia Vermelha, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil)

  • Maria Esther Soares Marques

    (Military Institute of Engineering, Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Praia Vermelha, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil)

Abstract

The emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) is a cause for concern when seeking sustainable development in view of global warming. The multiple ecosystem services associated with land use and land cover are at the center of the global climate agenda, both as a mitigation and adaptation strategy to climate change and growing urbanization. Among these services is carbon storage and sequestration (CSS). It can remove GHG carbon from the atmosphere and store it in the form of organic matter, a natural carbon stock. Thus, to design projects that guarantee sustainable development, it is necessary to use metrics that can quantify the impact of sequestration on natural carbon stocks. We aimed to implement the InVEST CSS methodology in the region of Itaperuna-RJ (Brazil) to quantify the net change in carbon storage over time (sequestration and loss) between 2015 and 2020. The obtained total difference in carbon stocks between the analyzed maps was −39,103.56 × 10 3 kg C, which has an equivalent social cost of carbon of USD 16,559,187.69. This social value represents the social damage caused by releasing that amount of carbon into the atmosphere. This main result brings an important application for validating the InVEST CSS methodology in Brazil. Furthermore, it points out parameters that can help elaborate sustainable development policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Norton Barros Felix & Priscila Celebrini de Oliveira Campos & Igor Paz & Maria Esther Soares Marques, 2022. "Geoprocessing Applied to the Assessment of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in a Brazilian Medium-Sized City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8761-:d:865191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Federico Galán-Valdivieso & Laura Saraite-Sariene & Juana Alonso-Cañadas & María del Carmen Caba-Pérez, 2019. "Do Corporate Carbon Policies Enhance Legitimacy? A Social Media Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Wubeshet Damtea & Dongyeob Kim & Sangjun Im, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Cover Changes in the Chemoga Basin, Ethiopia, Using Landsat and Google Earth Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Priscila Celebrini de Oliveira Campos & Tainá da Silva Rocha Paz & Letícia Lenz & Yangzi Qiu & Camila Nascimento Alves & Ana Paula Roem Simoni & José Carlos Cesar Amorim & Gilson Brito Alves Lima & Ma, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision Method for Sustainable Watercourse Management in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Anastasia Nikologianni & Kathryn Moore & Peter J. Larkham, 2019. "Making Sustainable Regional Design Strategies Successful," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Maggie G. Munthali & Nerhene Davis & Abiodun M. Adeola & Joel O. Botai & Jonathan M. Kamwi & Harold L. W. Chisale & Oluwagbenga O. I. Orimoogunje, 2019. "Local Perception of Drivers of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Dynamics across Dedza District, Central Malawi Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Matthew J. Kotchen, 2018. "Which Social Cost of Carbon? A Theoretical Perspective," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(3), pages 673-694.
    7. Hailu, Alemenesh & Mammo, Siraj & Kidane, Moges, 2020. "Dynamics of land use, land cover change trend and its drivers in Jimma Geneti District, Western Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Bluffstone, R. & Coulston, J. & Haight, R.G. & Kline, J. & Polasky, S. & Wear, D.N. & Zook, K., "undated". "Estimated Values of Carbon Sequestration Resulting from Forest Management Scenarios," C-FARE Reports 260680, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard S.J. Tol, 2021. "Estimates of the social cost of carbon have not changed over time," Working Paper Series 0821, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Doda, Baran & Quemin, Simon & Taschini, Luca, 2019. "Linking permit markets multilaterally," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Sara Demir & Merve Dilman Gokkaya & Nazlı Deniz Ersoz, 2025. "Prioritization Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategies: Developing a Hybrid Quantitative Approach Model for Sustainable Urban Water Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(8), pages 3901-3919, June.
    4. Anastasia Nikologianni & Alessandro Betta & Angelica Pianegonda & Sara Favargiotti & Kathryn Moore & Nick Grayson & Elisa Morganti & Martin Berg & Anna Ternell & Marco Ciolli & Michela Angeli & Anders, 2020. "New Integrated Approaches to Climate Emergency Landscape Strategies: The Case of Pan-European SATURN Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Tamma Carleton & Michael Greenstone, 2021. "Updating the United States Government's Social Cost of Carbon," Working Papers 2021-04, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    6. Pablo Acebes & Zuriñe Iglesias-González & Francisco J. Muñoz-Galvez, 2021. "Do Traditional Livestock Systems Fit into Contemporary Landscapes? Integrating Social Perceptions and Values on Landscape Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Guastella, Gianni & Mazzarano, Matteo & Pareglio, Stefano & Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 2022. "Climate reputation risk and abnormal returns in the stock markets: A focus on large emitters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Landry, Joel R., 2025. "How heterogeneity in perceived external benefits differently affects federal and state efforts to address climate change," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Robert S. Pindyck, 2017. "Coase Lecture—Taxes, Targets and the Social Cost of Carbon," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 84(335), pages 345-364, July.
    10. Mwale, Martin Limbikani, 2022. "Unintended consequences of farm input subsidies: women’s contraceptive usage and knock-on effects on children," MPRA Paper 112689, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Nazgul Esengulova & Pasquale Balena & Caterina De Lucia & Antonio Lopolito & Pasquale Pazienza, 2024. "Key Drivers of Land Use Changes in the Rural Area of Gargano (South Italy) and Their Implications for the Local Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Oliver Schenker & Daniel Osberghaus, 2025. "International Trade and the Transmission of Temperature Shocks," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(4), pages 965-1007, April.
    13. Branko Bošković & Andrew Leach, 2020. "Leave it in the ground? Oil sands development under carbon pricing," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 526-562, May.
    14. Zhou, Bing-Bing & Aggarwal, Rimjhim & Wu, Jianguo & Lv, Ligang, 2021. "Urbanization-associated farmland loss: A macro-micro comparative study in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Ruggiero Sardaro & Daniela Panio & Paweł Chmieliński & Piermichele La Sala, 2024. "Efficiency of the Integrated Production Systems: Evidence from the Winegrowing Firms in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Zaiter, Issa & Ramadan, Mohamad & Bouabid, Ali & El-Fadel, Mutasem & Mezher, Toufic, 2023. "Potential utilization of hydrogen in the UAE's industrial sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Sujarwo & Aditya Nugraha Putra & Raden Arief Setyawan & Heitor Mancini Teixeira & Uma Khumairoh, 2022. "Forecasting Rice Status for a Food Crisis Early Warning System Based on Satellite Imagery and Cellular Automata in Malang, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Claire Brunel & Arik Levinson, 2026. "Carbon Tariffs," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(1), pages 33-64.
    19. Abdalrahman Ahmed & Brian Rotich & Kornel Czimber, 2024. "Assessment of the environmental impacts of conflict-driven Internally Displaced Persons: A sentinel-2 satellite based analysis of land use/cover changes in the Kas locality, Darfur, Sudan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Laura Saraite-Sariene & Juana Alonso-Cañadas & Federico Galán-Valdivieso & Carmen Caba-Pérez, 2019. "Non-Financial Information versus Financial as a Key to the Stakeholder Engagement: A Higher Education Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8761-:d:865191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.