IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p284-d303312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Legitimization of the Provision of Emergency Centralized Accommodations to Displaced Persons

Author

Listed:
  • Julie C. Faure

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Kasey M. Faust

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Jessica Kaminsky

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2700, USA)

Abstract

Sudden population influxes into cities—such as those seen during post-disaster migration—place unexpected demands on the urban housing system. Decisions made during these influxes are often controversial, potentially hindering the ability of the organizations involved to respond. This study’s objective was to explore strategies (e.g., types of information shared and types of accommodation chosen) that can be used during decision-making processes when providing emergency accommodations to increase stakeholder acceptance, and thus lead to sustainable institutional responses. This study specifically sought to shed light on how, during the Refugee Crisis in Germany of 2015 and 2016, stakeholders legitimized decisions made to provide centralized emergency accommodations to displaced persons. Making this study possible were 25 semi-structured interviews with utility, government, nonprofit, and company employees involved in the provision of centralized accommodations for displaced persons. Interviews were conducted in 2016 and underwent a qualitative analysis. Results indicate that stakeholders primarily legitimized the provision of centralized accommodations based on convictions of right and wrong (moral legitimacy), while they legitimized decisions to not provide such accommodations based on their understanding and experience of practical barriers (cultural-cognitive legitimacy). Recommendations arising from this study include the following: provide information to stakeholders about accommodations’ livability (to gain consequential legitimacy) and past successes (to gain comprehensibility legitimacy), adapt regulations to help stakeholders use procedural legitimacy, and prefer fully renovated buildings or modular housing to buildings with no major renovations or container housing (to gain consequential rather than procedural legitimacy).

Suggested Citation

  • Julie C. Faure & Kasey M. Faust & Jessica Kaminsky, 2019. "Stakeholder Legitimization of the Provision of Emergency Centralized Accommodations to Displaced Persons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:284-:d:303312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Kantsperger & Hannes Thees & Christian Eckert, 2019. "Local Participation in Tourism Development—Roles of Non-Tourism Related Residents of the Alpine Destination Bad Reichenhall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Sebastian Mehling & Nina Kolleck, 2019. "Cross-Sector Collaboration in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs): A Critical Analysis of an Urban Sustainability Development Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Fangxin Yi & Yong Tu, 2018. "An Evaluation of the Paired Assistance to Disaster-Affected Areas Program in Disaster Recovery: The Case of the Wenchuan Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Pablo Bris & Félix Bendito, 2017. "Lessons Learned from the Failed Spanish Refugee System: For the Recovery of Sustainable Public Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, August.
    5. M. Tina Dacin & Christine Oliver & Jean‐Paul Roy, 2007. "The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 169-187, February.
    6. Susanne Soederberg, 2019. "Governing Global Displacement in Austerity Urbanism: The Case of Berlin's Refugee Housing Crisis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(4), pages 923-947, July.
    7. Federico Galán-Valdivieso & Laura Saraite-Sariene & Juana Alonso-Cañadas & María del Carmen Caba-Pérez, 2019. "Do Corporate Carbon Policies Enhance Legitimacy? A Social Media Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Sofie Storbjörk & Mattias Hjerpe & Erik Glaas, 2019. "“Take It or Leave It”: From Collaborative to Regulative Developer Dialogues in Six Swedish Municipalities Aiming to Climate-Proof Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Mohammed Al-Husban & Carl Adams, 2016. "Sustainable Refugee Migration: A Rethink towards a Positive Capability Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    10. Nihad El-Kayed & Ulrike Hamann, 2018. "Refugees’ Access to Housing and Residency in German Cities: Internal Border Regimes and Their Local Variations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 135-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wonjung Ryu & Sun Won Park, 2018. "Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Social Isolation among North Korean Refugee Women in South Korea: The Moderating Role of Formal and Informal Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Ilhan-Nas, Tulay & Okan, Tarhan & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Demirbag, Mehmet & Wood, Geoffrey & Glaister, Keith W., 2018. "Board composition, family ownership, institutional distance and the foreign equity ownership strategies of Turkish MNEs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 862-879.
    3. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    4. Marlous Blankesteijn & Bart Bossink, 2020. "Assessing the Legitimacy of Technological Innovation in the Public Sphere: Recovering Raw Materials from Waste Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Jianghua Zhou & Rui Wu & Jizhen Li, 2019. "More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 445-471, June.
    6. Zelong Wei & Hao Shen & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li, 2017. "How Does Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in a Dysfunctional Institutional Environment? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 209-223, January.
    7. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.
    8. Liwen Wang & Jin Jason Lu & Kevin Zhou, 2023. "Technological Capability Strength/Asymmetry and Supply Chain Process Innovation: The Contingent Roles of Institutional Environments in China," Post-Print hal-03954124, HAL.
    9. Antonio J. Mateo-Márquez & José M. González-González & Constancio Zamora-Ramírez, 2021. "Components of Countries’ Regulative Dimensions and Voluntary Carbon Disclosures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Tarkom, Augustine & Ujah, Nacasius U., 2023. "Global policy uncertainty and working capital management: Does national culture matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Ulrike Hamann & Gökçe Yurdakul, 2018. "The Transformative Forces of Migration: Refugees and the Re-Configuration of Migration Societies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 110-114.
    12. Mutch, Nicola & Aitken, Robert, 2009. "Being fair and being seen to be fair: Corporate reputation and CSR partnerships," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 92-98.
    13. Liu, Xiaohui & Xia, Tianjiao & Jiangyong, Lu & Lin, Daomi, 2019. "Under what institutional conditions does overseas business knowledge contribute to firm performance?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 588-602.
    14. Dymitrow Mirek & Halfacree Keith, 2018. "Sustainability–differently," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 40(40), pages 7-16, June.
    15. En Xie & Mike Peng & Wenhong Zhao, 2013. "Uncertainties, resources, and supplier selection in an emerging economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1219-1242, December.
    16. Norton Barros Felix & Priscila Celebrini de Oliveira Campos & Igor Paz & Maria Esther Soares Marques, 2022. "Geoprocessing Applied to the Assessment of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in a Brazilian Medium-Sized City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Chang Lu & Yong Qi & Bo Yu, 2024. "Effects of Domestic and International External Collaboration on New Product Development Performance in SMEs: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Qiong Yao & Suzhen Zeng & Shibin Sheng & Shiyuan Gong, 2021. "Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 573-602, June.
    19. Dan Cohen, 2021. "Philanthropy to the rescue? Detroit’s schools and urban policymaking under austerity," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(7), pages 1547-1566, November.
    20. Alicia Blanco-González & Francisco Díez-Martín & Giorgia Miotto, 2023. "Achieving Legitimacy Through Gender Equality Policies," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:284-:d:303312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.