IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8045-d853520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Food Packaging: An Integrative Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Romina Santi

    (Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Via Luigi Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milan, Italy)

  • Paola Garrone

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4b, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Mattia Iannantuoni

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4b, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Barbara Del Curto

    (Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Via Luigi Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milan, Italy
    National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), Via G. Giusti 9, 50121 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

The paper proposes a comprehensive and operational definition of Sustainable Food Packaging (SFP). Sustainability is a multifaceted concept, yet most SFP conversations decline it as a mere material substitution issue. The efforts of regulators, packaging producers, food companies, and consumers towards the design and adoption of SFP products are likely to fail without a common understanding of the multiple means by which food packaging contributes to sustainability. Based on an extensive literature review and the contributions of SFP innovation experts, the paper builds a Food Packaging Sustainability Framework (FPSF) that encompasses the three main dimensions of SFP, namely environmental conservation, food safety, and social value, and operationalizes them in terms of objectives and activable levers. The framework can be used as a tool to search and evaluate food packaging products, a conceptual guide for SFP design, and a narrative platform for coordinating supply chain actors, including consumers. The experimental activities applying FPSF gathered the different actors in the supply chain to jointly adopt the integrated model that distributes environmental, social, and economic benefits along the entire production chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Romina Santi & Paola Garrone & Mattia Iannantuoni & Barbara Del Curto, 2022. "Sustainable Food Packaging: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8045-:d:853520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Disdier, Anne-Célia & Marette, Stéphan, 2012. "How do consumers in developed countries value the environment and workers’ social rights in developing countries?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-11.
    2. Nikki Clark & Rhoda Trimingham & Garrath T. Wilson, 2020. "Incorporating Consumer Insights into the UK Food Packaging Supply Chain in the Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    3. McNicholas, Grace & Cotton, Matthew, 2019. "Stakeholder perceptions of marine plastic waste management in the United Kingdom," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 77-87.
    4. Måns Nilsson & Dave Griggs & Martin Visbeck, 2016. "Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7607), pages 320-322, June.
    5. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-00754604 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Bleich, S.N. & Herring, B.J. & Flagg, D.D. & Gary-Webb, T.L., 2012. "Reduction in purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages among low-income black adolescents after exposure to caloric information," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(2), pages 329-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Urška Vrabič‐Brodnjak & Iva Jestratijević, 2024. "The future of baby cosmetics packaging and sustainable development: A look at sustainable materials and packaging innovations – A systematic review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2208-2222, June.
    2. Groth, Carolin & Wegmann, Christoph & Meyerding, Stephan G.H., 2023. "Perception of product sustainability: The case of processed tomatoes – A qualitative study in Germany," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Preetha Kizhakkekara Vannadil & Chitra Karunakaran Prasanna, 2023. "Integrating sustainable development goals into environment impact assessment in India: A conceptual analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 3993-4006, December.
    4. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    5. Prashamsa Thapa & Brijesh Mainali & Shobhakar Dhakal, 2023. "Focus on Climate Action: What Level of Synergy and Trade-Off Is There between SDG 13; Climate Action and Other SDGs in Nepal?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-32, January.
    6. Lucia de Strasser, "undated". "Calling for Nexus Thinking in Africa’s Energy Planning," ESP: Energy Scenarios and Policy 263161, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    7. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    8. von Grafenstein, Liza & Iweala, Sarah & Ruml, Anette, 2021. "Information Source and Content – Drivers for Consumers’ Valuation of Fairly Traded Foods," Sustainable Food Systems Discussion Papers 317123, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    9. Padala Raja Shekar & Aneesh Mathew & Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher & Kaleem Mehmood & Mohamed Zhran, 2025. "Towards Sustainable Development: Ranking of Soil Erosion-Prone Areas Using Morphometric Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-28, March.
    10. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    11. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2020. "Beyond COVID-19: Applying “SDG logics” for resilient transformations," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 451-464, December.
    12. Tiffanie F. Stone & Janette R. Thompson & Kurt A. Rosentrater & Ajay Nair, 2021. "A Life Cycle Assessment Approach for Vegetables in Large-, Mid-, and Small-Scale Food Systems in the Midwest US," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Valeria Andreoni & Valeria Ruiz Vargas, 2020. "Tracking the Interlinkages across SDGs: The Case of Hill Centered Education Network in Bogota, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Wu, Tao & Xu, Wenxuan & Kung, Chih-Chun, 2025. "The impact of data elements on urban sustainable development: Evidence from the big data policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Peterson K. Ozili & Paul Terhemba Iorember, 2024. "Financial stability and sustainable development," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2620-2646, July.
    16. John C. Beghin & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen, 2017. "Nontariff Measures and Standards in Trade and Global Value Chains," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 2, pages 13-38 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Efraim Hernández-Orozco & Ivonne Lobos-Alva & Mario Cardenas-Vélez & David Purkey & Måns Nilsson & Piedad Martin, 2022. "The application of soft systems thinking in SDG interaction studies: a comparison between SDG interactions at national and subnational levels in Colombia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8930-8964, June.
    18. John C. Beghin & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen, 2017. "Nontariff Measures and Standards in Trade and Global Value Chains," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 2, pages 13-38, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Su-Mei Chen & Jia-Jia Ou & Ling-Yun He, 2021. "The Environmental and Health Impacts of Poverty Alleviation in China: From a Consumption-Based Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Karla Rubio‐Jovel & Jorge Sellare & Yannic Damm & Thomas Dietz, 2024. "SDGs trade‐offs associated with voluntary sustainability standards: A case study from the coffee sector in Costa Rica," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 917-939, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8045-:d:853520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.