IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8031-d853328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Personality Traits and Information Privacy Concern on E-Learning Environment Adoption during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Mei-Hui Peng

    (Institute of Information Management, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan)

  • Bireswar Dutta

    (English Taught Program in Smart Service Management, Department of Information Technology and Management, Taipei Campus, Shih Chien University, Taipei 10462, Taiwan)

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, teaching and learning processes have experienced significant changes. Higher education institutions in Taiwan employed crisis intervention measures to instantly implement unified learning methods such as online teaching and learning. However, students had no time to prepare. Thus, the study explored the relationship between personality traits and the belief in conspiracy theory as antecedents of students’ concern for information privacy (CFIP) and the subsequent relationship between students’ CFIP and behavioral intention to report their personal information to e-learning service providers concerning the adoption of the e-learning environment. This cross-sectional study employed a questionnaire to accumulate data from university students in Taiwan. A total of 285 valid responses were used for the final analysis. The research framework was evaluated by structural equation modeling (SEM). The results suggest the proposed model explains about 66.4% of the variance of behavioral intention (R 2 = 0.664). The findings support that four personality traits—agreeableness, openness to experiences, conscientiousness, and neuroticism—and belief in conspiracy theory significantly influenced students’ CFIP. However, concerning extraversion, an insignificant path coefficient was reported. CFIP mediates the relationship between belief in conspiracy theory and behavioral intention. E-learning service providers should consider these determinants in improving and endorsing principles concerning e-learning environment adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei-Hui Peng & Bireswar Dutta, 2022. "Impact of Personality Traits and Information Privacy Concern on E-Learning Environment Adoption during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8031-:d:853328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8031/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8031/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen, 2021. "When, What and How to Teach about Electric Mobility? An Innovative Teaching Concept for All Stages of Education: Lessons from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Roberts, Ruby & Flin, Rhona & Millar, David & Corradi, Luca, 2021. "Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Virginia Gewin, 2020. "Five tips for moving teaching online as COVID-19 takes hold," Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7802), pages 295-296, April.
    4. Sara Quach & Park Thaichon & Kelly D. Martin & Scott Weaven & Robert W. Palmatier, 2022. "Digital technologies: tensions in privacy and data," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1299-1323, November.
    5. Kathy A. Stewart & Albert H. Segars, 2002. "An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 36-49, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalliope Kounenou & Angelos Giannoulas & Aglaia Stampoltzis & Antonios Kalamatianos & Ntina Kourmousi & Christos Pezirkianidis, 2022. "Perspectives on Emergency Remote Teaching during COVID-19 Pandemic in a Sample of Greek Undergraduate Students: The Role of Self-Image," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Chiemela Victor Amaechi & Ebube Charles Amaechi & Abiodun Kolawole Oyetunji & Irish Mpho Kgosiemang, 2022. "Scientific Review and Annotated Bibliography of Teaching in Higher Education Academies on Online Learning: Adapting to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Yeolib & Kim, Seung Hyun & Peterson, Robert A. & Choi, Jeonghye, 2023. "Privacy concern and its consequences: A meta-analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Farhad, Mohsin Ali, 2024. "Consumer data protection laws and their impact on business models in the tech industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9).
    3. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Corey Angst, 2009. "Protect My Privacy or Support the Common-Good? Ethical Questions About Electronic Health Information Exchanges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 169-178, November.
    5. Ibrahim Mutambik & John Lee & Abdullah Almuqrin & Waleed Halboob & Taha Omar & Ahmad Floos, 2022. "User concerns regarding information sharing on social networking sites: The user’s perspective in the context of national culture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    7. David Harborth & Sebastian Pape, 2020. "Empirically Investigating Extraneous Influences on the “APCO” Model—Childhood Brand Nostalgia and the Positivity Bias," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Biancone, Paolo & Secinaro, Silvana & Marseglia, Roberto & Calandra, Davide, 2023. "E-health for the future. Managerial perspectives using a multiple case study approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Liliana Andrei & Oana Luca & Florian Gaman, 2022. "Insights from User Preferences on Automated Vehicles: Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Value of Time in Romania Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Hui Zheng & Baohong He & Mingwei He & Jinghui Guo, 2022. "Impact of Urban Spatial Transformation on the Mobility of Commuters with Different Transportation Modes in China: Evidence from Kunming 2011–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Tajvidi, Mina & Richard, Marie-Odile & Wang, YiChuan & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 476-486.
    13. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2005. "Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 61-84, March.
    14. Freddy Marilahimbilu Mgiba & Thozama Mxotwa, 2024. "Communicating Banking Cyber-security Measures, Customer Ethical Concerns, Experience, and Loyalty Intentions: A Developing Economy’s Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 123-135, May.
    15. Esther Calderon-Monge & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2024. "The role of digitalization in business and management: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 449-491, February.
    16. Chen, Xiaogang & Ma, Jing & Jin, Jiafei & Fosh, Patricia, 2013. "Information privacy, gender differences, and intrinsic motivation in the workplace," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 917-926.
    17. Inman, J. Jeffrey & Nikolova, Hristina, 2017. "Shopper-Facing Retail Technology: A Retailer Adoption Decision Framework Incorporating Shopper Attitudes and Privacy Concerns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 7-28.
    18. Verhagen, Tibert & Meents, Selmar, 2007. "A Framework for Developing Semantic Differentials in IS research: Assessing the Meaning of Electronic Marketplace Quality (EMQ)," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    19. George Mihail Man & Daniela Zamfir & Daniel Diaconescu & Andra-Victoria Radu & Florentina Aldea & Georgeta Ionescu, 2025. "The Role of Digital Technologies and Intellectual Property Management in Driving Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Enow, Samuel Tabot, 2023. "Investigating the merits of support and resistance strategy: Evidence from international financial markets," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 10(02), pages 01-06, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8031-:d:853328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.