IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5792-d812775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geothermal Heat Pumps for Slurry Cooling and Farm Heating: Impact and Carbon Footprint Reduction in Pig Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Sáez Blázquez

    (Department of Electric, System and Automatic Engineering, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
    Department of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Avila, University of Salamanca, Hornos Caleros 50, 05003 Avila, Spain)

  • David Borge-Diez

    (Department of Electric, System and Automatic Engineering, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Ignacio Martín Nieto

    (Department of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Avila, University of Salamanca, Hornos Caleros 50, 05003 Avila, Spain)

  • Miguel Ángel Maté-González

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Departamento de Ingeniería Cartográfica, Geodésica y Fotogrametría, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Sur, A-3, Km 7, 28031 Madrid, Spain)

  • Arturo Farfán Martín

    (Department of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Avila, University of Salamanca, Hornos Caleros 50, 05003 Avila, Spain)

  • Diego González-Aguilera

    (Department of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Avila, University of Salamanca, Hornos Caleros 50, 05003 Avila, Spain)

Abstract

The pig farm sector has been developing rapidly over recent decades, leading to an increase in the production of slurry and associated environmental impacts. Breeding farms require the maintenance of adequate indoor thermal environments, resulting in high energy demands that are frequently met by fossil fuels and electricity. Farm heating systems and the storage of slurry constitute considerable sources of polluting gases. There is thus a need to highlight the advantages that new green heating solutions can offer to reduce the global environmental impact of pig farming. This research presents an overview of alternative pig farm slurry technology, using geothermal heat pumps, which reduces the harmful effects of slurry and improves the energy behavior of farms. The results reflect the environmental benefits of this solution in terms of reducing carbon and hydric footprints. Reducing the temperature of slurry with the geothermal heat pump of the system also reduces the annual amount of greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions, and, via the heat pump, slurry heat is used for installation heating. Annual emissions of CO 2 e could be reduced by more than half, and ammonia emissions could also experience a significant reduction if the slurry technology is installed. Additional advantages confirm the positive impact that the expansion of this renewable technology could have on the global pig farm sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Sáez Blázquez & David Borge-Diez & Ignacio Martín Nieto & Miguel Ángel Maté-González & Arturo Farfán Martín & Diego González-Aguilera, 2022. "Geothermal Heat Pumps for Slurry Cooling and Farm Heating: Impact and Carbon Footprint Reduction in Pig Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5792-:d:812775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borge-Diez, David & Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Pérez-Molina, Clara & López-Rey, África, 2015. "Geothermal source heat pumps under energy services companies finance scheme to increase energy efficiency and production in stockbreeding facilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 821-836.
    2. Alberti, Luca & Antelmi, Matteo & Angelotti, Adriana & Formentin, Giovanni, 2018. "Geothermal heat pumps for sustainable farm climatization and field irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 187-200.
    3. Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Florides, Georgios & Tassou, Savvas A., 2012. "A proposed methodology for the calculation of direct consumption of fossil fuels and electricity for livestock breeding, and its application to Cyprus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 226-235.
    4. Federica Borgonovo & Cecilia Conti & Daniela Lovarelli & Valentina Ferrante & Marcella Guarino, 2019. "Improving the Sustainability of Dairy Slurry by A Commercial Additive Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Cristina Sáez Blázquez & Arturo Farfán Martín & Ignacio Martín Nieto & Diego González-Aguilera, 2018. "Economic and Environmental Analysis of Different District Heating Systems Aided by Geothermal Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Lorente Rubio & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Juan Carlos Sáenz-Diez Muro & Eduardo Martínez-Cámara & Agostino Bruzzone & Julio Blanco-Fernández, 2022. "Environmental Impact Comparison of Geothermal Alternatives for Conventional Boiler Replacement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blázquez, Cristina Sáez & Borge-Diez, David & Nieto, Ignacio Martín & Maté-González, Miguel Ángel & Martín, Arturo Farfán & González-Aguilera, Diego, 2021. "Investigating the potential of the slurry technology for sustainable pig farm heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Antonio Colmenar-Santos & Elisabet Palomo-Torrejón & Enrique Rosales-Asensio & David Borge-Diez, 2018. "Measures to Remove Geothermal Energy Barriers in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Soheil Kavian & Mohsen Saffari Pour & Ali Hakkaki-Fard, 2019. "Optimized Design of the District Heating System by Considering the Techno-Economic Aspects and Future Weather Projection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Hannah Licharz & Peter Rösmann & Manuel S. Krommweh & Ehab Mostafa & Wolfgang Büscher, 2020. "Energy Efficiency of a Heat Pump System: Case Study in Two Pig Houses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Van linden, Veerle & Herman, Lieve, 2014. "A fuel consumption model for off-road use of mobile machinery in agriculture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 880-889.
    6. Miguel Gonzalez-Salazar & Thomas Langrock & Christoph Koch & Jana Spieß & Alexander Noack & Markus Witt & Michael Ritzau & Armin Michels, 2020. "Evaluation of Energy Transition Pathways to Phase out Coal for District Heating in Berlin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Andrea Costantino, 2023. "Development, Validation, and Application of Building Energy Simulation Models for Livestock Houses: A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Laveet Kumar & Md. Shouquat Hossain & Mamdouh El Haj Assad & Mansoor Urf Manoo, 2022. "Technological Advancements and Challenges of Geothermal Energy Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Matteo Antelmi & Francesco Turrin & Andrea Zille & Roberto Fedrizzi, 2023. "A New Type in TRNSYS 18 for Simulation of Borehole Heat Exchangers Affected by Different Groundwater Flow Velocities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Elizabeth G. Ross & Carlyn B. Peterson & Angelica V. Carrazco & Samantha J. Werth & Yongjing Zhao & Yuee Pan & Edward J. DePeters & James G. Fadel & Marcello E. Chiodini & Lorenzo Poggianella & Frank , 2020. "Effect of SOP “STAR COW” on Enteric Gaseous Emissions and Dairy Cattle Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Myeong Gil Jeong & Dhanushka Rathnayake & Hong Seok Mun & Muhammad Ammar Dilawar & Kwang Woo Park & Sang Ro Lee & Chul Ju Yang, 2020. "Effect of a Sustainable Air Heat Pump System on Energy Efficiency, Housing Environment, and Productivity Traits in a Pig Farm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Pereira Domingues Martinho, Vítor João, 2020. "Comparative analysis of energy costs on farms in the European Union: A nonparametric approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    13. Antonio José Steidle Neto & Daniela de Carvalho Lopes, 2021. "Technical analysis of photovoltaic energy generation for supplying the electricity demand in Brazilian dairy farms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1355-1370, February.
    14. Robin Zeh & Björn Ohlsen & David Philipp & David Bertermann & Tim Kotz & Nikola Jocić & Volker Stockinger, 2021. "Large-Scale Geothermal Collector Systems for 5th Generation District Heating and Cooling Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Bartnik, Ryszard & Buryn, Zbigniew & Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna & Kowalczyk, Tomasz, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic comparative analyses of a hierarchic gas-gas combined heat and power (CHP) plant coupled with a compressor heat pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    16. Ignacio Martín Nieto & Pedro Carrasco García & Cristina Sáez Blázquez & Arturo Farfán Martín & Diego González-Aguilera & Javier Carrasco García, 2020. "Geophysical Prospecting for Geothermal Resources in the South of the Duero Basin (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Costantino, Andrea & Comba, Lorenzo & Cornale, Paolo & Fabrizio, Enrico, 2022. "Energy impact of climate control in pig farming: Dynamic simulation and experimental validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    18. Romanov, D. & Leiss, B., 2022. "Geothermal energy at different depths for district heating and cooling of existing and future building stock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Ioan Sarbu & Matei Mirza & Daniel Muntean, 2022. "Integration of Renewable Energy Sources into Low-Temperature District Heating Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Kung, Chih-Chun & Lan, Xiaolong & Yang, Yunxia & Kung, Shan-Shan & Chang, Meng-Shiuh, 2022. "Effects of green bonds on Taiwan's bioenergy development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5792-:d:812775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.