IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p231-d711690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Does Abusive Supervision Foster Ineffectual and Defensive Silence? Employee Self-Efficacy and Fear as Contingencies

Author

Listed:
  • Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov

    (School of Business, Akfa University, Tashkent 100084, Uzbekistan)

  • Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov

    (School of Business, Akfa University, Tashkent 100084, Uzbekistan)

  • Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev

    (School of Business, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea)

  • Wei Sun

    (School of Economics, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationships between abusive supervision and two forms of silence, ineffectual and defensive; the moderating role of self-efficacy in the association between abusive supervision and ineffectual silence and the contingency role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence. We collected data from 685 employees in manufacturing companies. Of these, 271 were incomplete questionnaires and were excluded from the study; the remaining 414 responses were assessed in the analyses. The results indicate that abusive supervision fosters ineffectual and defensive silence. Moreover, the results suggest that even if supervisors are abusive, individuals with a higher level of self-efficacy tend to have a lower level of ineffectual silence. Furthermore, fear strengthens the link between abusive supervision and defensive silence. According to our knowledge, this work is the first to investigate the relationship between abusive supervision and ineffectual silence, the contingency role of self-efficacy in the link between abusive supervision and ineffectual silence and the moderating role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence.

Suggested Citation

  • Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Wei Sun, 2021. "When Does Abusive Supervision Foster Ineffectual and Defensive Silence? Employee Self-Efficacy and Fear as Contingencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:231-:d:711690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thau, Stefan & Bennett, Rebecca J. & Mitchell, Marie S. & Marrs, Mary Beth, 2009. "How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 79-92, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gang Wang & Peter Harms & Jeremy Mackey, 2015. "Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 487-503, October.
    2. Giova Wulandari & Muafi Muafi, 2021. "The effect of self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior toward knowledge sharing:The mediation role of abusive supervision," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 128-138, June.
    3. Neves, Pedro & Champion, Stephen, 2015. "Core self-evaluations and workplace deviance: The role of resources and self-regulation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 381-391.
    4. Joon Hyung Park & Min Z. Carter & Richard S. DeFrank & Qianwen Deng, 2018. "Abusive Supervision, Psychological Distress, and Silence: The Effects of Gender Dissimilarity Between Supervisors and Subordinates," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 775-792, December.
    5. Émilie Lapointe & Christian Vandenberghe, 2018. "Examination of the Relationships Between Servant Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Voice and Antisocial Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 99-115, March.
    6. Magdaline Enow Mbi Tarkang Mary & Ali Ozturen, 2019. "Sustainable Ethical Leadership and Employee Outcomes in the Hotel Industry in Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Masterson, Courtney & Sun, Jiaqing & Wayne, Sandy J. & Kluemper, Donald, 2021. "The roller coaster of happiness: an investigation of intern’s happiness variability, LMX, and job-seeking goals," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116952, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Christine Henle & Michael Gross, 2014. "What Have I Done to Deserve This? Effects of Employee Personality and Emotion on Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 461-474, July.
    9. Yucheng Zhang & Zhenyu Liao, 2015. "Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 959-987, December.
    10. Tepper, Bennett J. & Carr, Jon C. & Breaux, Denise M. & Geider, Sharon & Hu, Changya & Hua, Wei, 2009. "Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 156-167, July.
    11. Haesang Park & Jenny M. Hoobler & Junfeng Wu & Robert C. Liden & Jia Hu & Morgan S. Wilson, 2019. "Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1113-1131, September.
    12. Yue Wang & Wenhao Luo & Jing Zhang & Yirong Guo, 2019. "More humility, less counterproductive work behaviors? The role of interpersonal justice and trust," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Klaudia Martynowska & Tomasz Korulczyk & Piotr Janusz Mamcarz, 2020. "Perceived stress and well-being of Polish migrants in the UK after Brexit vote," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Alam Sher, Shabana Gul, Muhammad Khan Riaz, Muhammad Naeem, 2019. "Psychological Safety: A Cross-level Study of a Higher Educational Institute (HEI)," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 6(1), pages 30-49, March.
    15. Jesse T. Vullinghs & Annebel H. B. Hoogh & Deanne N. Den Hartog & Corine Boon, 2020. "Ethical and Passive Leadership and Their Joint Relationships with Burnout via Role Clarity and Role Overload," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 719-733, September.
    16. Yijing Lyu & Long-Zeng Wu & Yijiao Ye & Ho Kwong Kwan & Yuanyi Chen, 2023. "Rebellion Under Exploitation: How and When Exploitative Leadership Evokes Employees’ Workplace Deviance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 483-498, July.
    17. Long-Zeng Wu & Haina Zhang & Randy Chiu & Ho Kwan & Xiaogang He, 2014. "Hostile Attribution Bias and Negative Reciprocity Beliefs Exacerbate Incivility’s Effects on Interpersonal Deviance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 189-199, March.
    18. Shahab Ali & Iftikhar Hussain & Farrukh Shahzad & Aneeqa Afaq, 2022. "A Multidimensional Model of Abusive Supervision and Work Incivility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Ojha, Divesh & Salimath, Manjula & D’Souza, Derrick, 2014. "Disaster immunity and performance of service firms: The influence of market acuity and supply network partnering," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 385-397.
    20. Hildreth, John Angus D., 2024. "When loyalty binds: Examining the effectiveness of group versus personal loyalty calls on followers’ compliance with leaders’ unethical requests," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:231-:d:711690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.