IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5098-d547780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Shrimp Waste for the Synthesis of Polyurethane–Chitosan Materials with Potential Use in Sorption of Oil Micro-Spills in Water Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Piotrowska-Kirschling

    (Department of Industrial Product Quality and Chemistry, Faculty of Management and Quality Science, Gdynia Maritime University, Morska Street 81-87, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Szelągowska-Rudzka

    (Department of Management and Economics, Faculty of Management and Quality Science, Gdynia Maritime University, Morska Street 81-87, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland)

  • Jakub Karczewski

    (Advanced Materials Center, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza Street 11-12, 80-223 Gdańsk, Poland
    Institute of Nanotechnology and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza Street 11-12, 80-223 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Joanna Brzeska

    (Department of Industrial Product Quality and Chemistry, Faculty of Management and Quality Science, Gdynia Maritime University, Morska Street 81-87, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland)

Abstract

Shrimp waste is a common waste in seafood processing. It is used as part of the fish meal which is added to feed. Bearing in mind the Green Deal and sustainability development, it was proposed to use northern prawn shells to obtain chitosan (Ch), which could then be used for polyurethane (PUR) modification. In ports, oil micro-spills often flow into the waters of gulfs and, consequently, into the sea. Systematic chemical and petroleum water pollution may pose a threat to flora and fauna. In this study, chitosan, which was obtained from shrimp shells, was used to synthesize polyurethane–chitosan foams (PUR+Ch) with different chitosan concentrations. Selected physico-chemical and sorption properties in relation to oil and water of these materials were determined. It was found that the amount of Ch added to the foam affected its morphology, hardness, density, and thermal and sorption properties. PUR foam with a 1.5% weight of Ch was characterized as having the highest water and oil sorption. The advantages of the tested material as an innovative product with potentially significant proecological values were estimated using strengths–weaknesses–opportunities–threats (SWOT) analysis. The conducted preliminary research made it possible to demonstrate the use of these materials in the processes of water treatment with the mentioned micropollutants.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Piotrowska-Kirschling & Katarzyna Szelągowska-Rudzka & Jakub Karczewski & Joanna Brzeska, 2021. "Application of Shrimp Waste for the Synthesis of Polyurethane–Chitosan Materials with Potential Use in Sorption of Oil Micro-Spills in Water Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5098-:d:547780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5098/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5098/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon E. Uhunamure & Karabo Shale, 2021. "A SWOT Analysis Approach for a Sustainable Transition to Renewable Energy in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Evidence Akhayere & Ashok Vaseashta & Doga Kavaz, 2020. "Novel Magnetic Nano Silica Synthesis Using Barley Husk Waste for Removing Petroleum from Polluted Water for Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Bull, J.W. & Jobstvogt, N. & Böhnke-Henrichs, A. & Mascarenhas, A. & Sitas, N. & Baulcomb, C. & Lambini, C.K. & Rawlins, M. & Baral, H. & Zähringer, J. & Carter-Silk, E. & Balzan, M.V. & Kenter, J.O. , 2016. "Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 99-111.
    4. Marat Rudakov & Elena Gridina & Jürgen Kretschmann, 2021. "Risk-Based Thinking as a Basis for Efficient Occupational Safety Management in the Mining Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Muhammad Shafiq & Abdulrahman Ali Alazba & Muhammad Tahir Amin, 2021. "Kinetic and Isotherm Studies of Ni 2+ and Pb 2+ Adsorption from Synthetic Wastewater Using Eucalyptus camdulensis —Derived Biochar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    7. Sandra Ricart & Rubén A. Villar-Navascués & Maria Hernández-Hernández & Antonio M. Rico-Amorós & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Enrique Moltó-Mantero, 2021. "Extending Natural Limits to Address Water Scarcity? The Role of Non-Conventional Water Fluxes in Climate Change Adaptation Capacity: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, February.
    8. Sikandar Ali Abbasi & Khanji Harijan & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Faheemullah Shaikh & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat, 2021. "Is Coal Power Generation a Sustainable Solution for Energy Needs of Pakistan: A Delphi-SWOT Paradigm?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 308-317.
    9. Ulucak, Recep & Danish, & Ozcan, Burcu, 2020. "Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Miguel Rodrigues & Carla Antunes, 2021. "Best Management Practices for the Transition to a Water-Sensitive City in the South of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    11. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "RES-T trajectories and an integrated SWOT-AHP analysis for biomethane. Policy implications to support a green revolution in European transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Ilaria Vigna & Lorenza Bianco & Francesco Goia & Valentina Serra, 2018. "Phase Change Materials in Transparent Building Envelopes: A Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiktor Hebda, 2024. "Gas from the South, Not from Russia: The Possibility of Distributing Natural Gas from the Eastern Mediterranean to Poland and Central Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. D’Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Huisingh, Donald & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2021. "A circular economy model based on biomethane: What are the opportunities for the municipality of Rome and beyond?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1660-1672.
    3. Damman, Sigrid & Schmuck, Alexandra & Oliveira, Rosário & Koop, Steven (Stef) H.A. & Almeida, Maria do Céu & Alegre, Helena & Ugarelli, Rita Maria, 2023. "Towards a water-smart society: Progress in linking theory and practice," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Agnė Žičkienė & Mangirdas Morkunas & Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene, 2022. "Sustainable Energy Development and Climate Change Mitigation at the Local Level through the Lens of Renewable Energy: Evidence from Lithuanian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Davide Bruno & Marinella Ferrara & Felice D’Alessandro & Alberto Mandelli, 2022. "The Role of Design in the CE Transition of the Furniture Industry—The Case of the Italian Company Cassina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Patrick Mukumba & Shylet Y. Chivanga, 2023. "An Overview of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa and the Rural Households’ Energy Poverty Coping Strategies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    8. Jaroslaw Golebiewski & Josu Takala & Oskar Juszczyk & Nina Drejerska, 2019. "Local contribution to circular economy. A case study of a Polish rural municipality," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(3), pages 771-791.
    9. Risa Arai & Martin Calisto Friant & Walter J. V. Vermeulen, 2024. "The Japanese Circular Economy and Sound Material-Cycle Society Policies: Discourse and Policy Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 619-650, March.
    10. Michael Edward Allkins & Tshepo Johannes Chauke & Portia Pearl Siyanda Sifolo, 2025. "Delivering Extraordinary Adventure Experiences During the “Chthulucene”: Circular Economy Challenges and Digital Solutions for the Environmentally Conscious Visitor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Orchard-Webb, Johanne & Kenter, Jasper O. & Bryce, Ros & Church, Andrew, 2016. "Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 308-318.
    12. Millar, Neal & McLaughlin, Eoin & Börger, Tobias, 2019. "The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 11-19.
    13. Debesh Mishra & Suchismita Satapathy, 2024. "Modified reaper for small-scale farmers: an approach for sustainable agriculture," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1451-1480, January.
    14. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Phoebe Koundouri, 2020. "The Economics of Sustainable Development," DEOS Working Papers 2005, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    15. Halkos, George & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "New developments in the disciplines of environmental and resource economics," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 513-522.
    16. Jose García‐Quevedo & Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Ester Martínez‐Ros, 2020. "Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2450-2464, September.
    17. Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin & Chiara Piccardo & Alexis Versele, 2022. "Social Impact Assessment of Circular Construction: Case of Living Lab Ghent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Van Phuc Phan, 2024. "Is a Circular Economy Model for a Developing Country Feasible? A Discussion from the Perspective of Mekong Delta of Vietnam," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 63-74, March.
    19. Amin, Azka & bte Mohamed Yusoff, Nora Yusma & Peng, Sun & Magazzino, Cosimo & Sharif, Arshian & Kamran, Hafiz Waqas, 2025. "Driving sustainable development: The impact of energy transition, eco-innovation, mineral resources, and green growth on carbon emissions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    20. Anca C. Farcas & Charis M. Galanakis & Carmen Socaciu & Oana L. Pop & Dorin Tibulca & Adriana Paucean & Mirela A. Jimborean & Melinda Fogarasi & Liana C. Salanta & Maria Tofana & Sonia A. Socaci, 2020. "Food Security during the Pandemic and the Importance of the Bioeconomy in the New Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5098-:d:547780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.