IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3865-d527634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freight Demand and Supply Assessment for Implementation of Crowdsourcing Technology: A Case Study in Bratislava, Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Andrii Galkin

    (Department of Transport Systems and Logistics, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, 17 Bazhanova str., 61001 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Tibor Schlosser

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 11 Radlinskeho str., 81005 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Ivan Cardenas

    (Department of Transport and Regional Economics, Antwerp University, Stadscampus 13, Prinsstraat, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Dominika Hodakova

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 11 Radlinskeho str., 81005 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Silvia Capayova

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 11 Radlinskeho str., 81005 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

The article studies the development of crowd shipping technologies in the Old Town of Bratislava. The paper aims to assess the potential for implementation of the crowdsourcing technology in the transport system of Bratislava. Methodology: An interview with the entrepreneurs in this area was conducted to assess the potential demand. In the survey, we collected information about type of goods; operations, quantities, and frequency of delivery; willingness to pay for one delivery among others. Based on the results, the freight demand, and its characteristics were assessed. The second part of the paper is devoted to assessing the supply of logistics to meet the demand. A survey of the willingness of ordinary travelers to work as an occasional courier was conducted. In the end, the equilibrium of demand and supply in the crowd shipping market in Bratislava is presented. The regression and correlation analysis were performed to understand the relationship between parameters of demand and delivery quantities in the first part of the research, sociodemographic characteristics of nonprofessional couriers, and the maximum weight of the parcel nonprofessional couriers agree to delivery. The willingness to pay per delivery was determined for respondents of different genders. Key findings: The results of the survey allowed us to estimate the freight demand for the Old Town of Bratislava, as well as to understand the needs of potential demand for crowd shipping services. The results of the second questionnaire show the sociodemographic characteristics of nonprofessional couriers (age, gender, gender, income, travel time) significantly influence the decision to participate in the delivery market.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrii Galkin & Tibor Schlosser & Ivan Cardenas & Dominika Hodakova & Silvia Capayova, 2021. "Freight Demand and Supply Assessment for Implementation of Crowdsourcing Technology: A Case Study in Bratislava, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3865-:d:527634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramanathan, R., 2001. "The long-run behaviour of transport performance in India: a cointegration approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 309-320, May.
    2. Quan Dai & Hongfei Jia & Yao Liu, 2020. "Private vehicle-based crowdshipping for intercity express transportation: Feasibility assessment," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(2), pages 15501477209, February.
    3. Yan, Shangyao & Lin, Jenn-Rong & Lai, Chun-Wei, 2013. "The planning and real-time adjustment of courier routing and scheduling under stochastic travel times and demands," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 34-48.
    4. Tho V. Le & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2019. "Influencing factors that determine the usage of the crowd-shipping services," Papers 1902.08681, arXiv.org.
    5. Mario Binetti & Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale & Michele Ottomanelli, 2019. "A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Perboli, Guido & Brotcorne, Luce & Bruni, Maria Elena & Rosano, Mariangela, 2021. "A new model for Last-Mile Delivery and Satellite Depots management: The impact of the on-demand economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    8. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Cook, Robert A. & Lodree, Emmett J., 2017. "Dispatching policies for last-mile distribution with stochastic supply and demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 353-371.
    10. Cintia Machado de Oliveira & Renata Albergaria De Mello Bandeira & George Vasconcelos Goes & Daniel Neves Schmitz Gonçalves & Márcio De Almeida D’Agosto, 2017. "Sustainable Vehicles-Based Alternatives in Last Mile Distribution of Urban Freight Transport: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Katrien De Langhe & Hilde Meersman & Christa Sys & Eddy Van de Voorde & Thierry Vanelslander, 2019. "How to make urban freight transport by tram successful?," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson, 2016. "Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Overcome First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8042k3d7, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Kulshreshtha, Mudit & Nag, Barnali & Kulshrestha, Mukul, 2001. "A multivariate cointegrating vector auto regressive model of freight transport demand: evidence from Indian railways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 29-45, January.
    14. Luigi Ranieri & Salvatore Digiesi & Bartolomeo Silvestri & Michele Roccotelli, 2018. "A Review of Last Mile Logistics Innovations in an Externalities Cost Reduction Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Marialisa Nigro & Sergio Maria Patella & Simone Serafini, 2018. "Public Transport-Based Crowdshipping for Sustainable City Logistics: Assessing Economic and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    3. Cebeci, Merve Seher & Tapia, Rodrigo Javier & Kroesen, Maarten & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2023. "The effect of trust on the choice for crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Juan Guillermo Urzúa-Morales & Juan Pedro Sepulveda-Rojas & Miguel Alfaro & Guillermo Fuertes & Rodrigo Ternero & Manuel Vargas, 2020. "Logistic Modeling of the Last Mile: Case Study Santiago, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Zareena Begum Irfan & Divya Jain & Satarupa Rakshit & Ashwin Ram, 2018. "Catalyst Role of Indian Railways in Empowering Economy: Freight or Passenger Segment is on the Fast Track of Expansion or Exploitation?," Working Papers 2018-170, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    7. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Thoen, Sebastian & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lori, 2023. "A disaggregate model of passenger-freight matching in crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    9. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Hao Jiang & Eric Ballot & Shenle Pan, 2019. "Modeling and analysis of alternative distribution and Physical Internet schemes in urban area [Modélisation et analyse de systèmes de distribution alternative et d'Internet physique en zone urbaine," Post-Print hal-02172073, HAL.
    12. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2022. "A Strategic Approach for Promoting Sustainable Crowdshipping in Last-Mile Deliveries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Wheat, Phill & Wardman, Mark, 2017. "Effects of timetable related service quality on rail demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 96-108.
    14. Marisdea Castiglione & Antonio Comi & Rosita De Vincentis & Andreea Dumitru & Marialisa Nigro, 2022. "Delivering in Urban Areas: A Probabilistic-Behavioral Approach for Forecasting the Use of Electric Micromobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Le, Tho V. & Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Xue, Jiawei & Van Woensel, Tom, 2021. "Designing pricing and compensation schemes by integrating matching and routing models for crowd-shipping systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Kexin Bi & Mengke Yang & Latif Zahid & Xiaoguang Zhou, 2020. "A New Solution for City Distribution to Achieve Environmental Benefits within the Trend of Green Logistics: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Asma Troudi & Sid-Ali Addouche & Sofiene Dellagi & Abderrahman El Mhamedi, 2018. "Sizing of the Drone Delivery Fleet Considering Energy Autonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Sijing Liu & Jiuping Xu & Xiaoyuan Shi & Guoqi Li & Dinglong Liu, 2018. "Sustainable Distribution Organization Based on the Supply–Demand Coordination in Large Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Techane Bosona, 2020. "Urban Freight Last Mile Logistics—Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Sustainability: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Cesar Eduardo Leite & Sérgio Ronaldo Granemann & Ari Melo Mariano & Leise Kelli de Oliveira, 2022. "Opinion of Residents about the Freight Transport and Its Influence on the Quality of Life: An Analysis for Brasília (Brazil)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3865-:d:527634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.