IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i4p135-d1756422.html

A Holistic Human-Based Approach to Last-Mile Delivery: Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of Logistics Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksa Maravić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Vukašin Pajić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Milan Andrejić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Background : The growing complexity of last-mile logistics (LML) in urban environments has created an urgent need for sustainable, efficient, and stakeholder-inclusive solutions. This study addresses these challenges by exploring a holistic, human-centered approach to evaluating LML strategies, recognizing the diverse expectations of logistics service providers, delivery personnel, customers, and local authorities. Methods : To capture both subjective and objective factors influencing decision-making, the study employs a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework that integrates the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Evaluation criteria encompass operational efficiency, environmental impact, social acceptance, and technological feasibility. Results : Six LML solutions were assessed and ranked using this approach. The results indicate that the cargo bike (A 2 ) emerged as the most favorable alternative, while electric freight vehicles (A 5 ) ranked lowest. These findings reflect significant trade-offs between stakeholder priorities and the varying performance of different delivery strategies. Conclusions : The proposed methodology offers practical guidance for designing balanced and socially responsible urban logistics systems. By emphasizing inclusivity in decision-making, this approach supports the development of LML solutions that are not only operationally effective but also environmentally sustainable and broadly accepted by stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksa Maravić & Vukašin Pajić & Milan Andrejić, 2025. "A Holistic Human-Based Approach to Last-Mile Delivery: Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of Logistics Strategies," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-37, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:135-:d:1756422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/4/135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/4/135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalliopi Michalakopoulou & Emilia Vann Yaroson & Ioannis Chatziioannou, 2025. "Decoding cargo bikes’ potential to be a sustainable last-mile delivery mode: an operations management perspective," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 712-734, May.
    2. Nadia Giuffrida & Jenny Fajardo-Calderin & Antonio D. Masegosa & Frank Werner & Margarete Steudter & Francesco Pilla, 2022. "Optimization and Machine Learning Applied to Last-Mile Logistics: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Kinga Kijewska & Witold Torbacki & Stanisław Iwan, 2018. "Application of AHP and DEMATEL Methods in Choosing and Analysing the Measures for the Distribution of Goods in Szczecin Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Le Pira, Michela & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Inturri, Giuseppe & Ignaccolo, Matteo & Pluchino, Alessandro, 2017. "Integrating discrete choice models and agent-based models for ex-ante evaluation of stakeholder policy acceptability in urban freight transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 13-25.
    5. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    6. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    7. Pahwa, Anmol & Jaller, Miguel, 2025. "Assessing the sustainability of last-mile distribution strategies to manage expedited shipping with dynamic and stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Luigi Ranieri & Salvatore Digiesi & Bartolomeo Silvestri & Michele Roccotelli, 2018. "A Review of Last Mile Logistics Innovations in an Externalities Cost Reduction Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasco Silva & António Amaral & Tânia Fontes, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Last-Mile Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2025. "Foresight for Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery: A Delphi-Based Scenario Study for Smart Cities in 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Vijoleta Vrhovac & Stana Vasić & Stevan Milisavljević & Branislav Dudić & Peter Štarchoň & Marina Žižakov, 2023. "Measuring E-Commerce User Experience in the Last-Mile Delivery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Muhammad Ali Aslam & Zhaolei Li, 2026. "A Way of Optimization of Last-Mile Logistics Operations. A Knowledge-Driven Literature review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 1414-1447, February.
    6. Techane Bosona, 2020. "Urban Freight Last Mile Logistics—Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Sustainability: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Giuffrida, Nadia & Calleo, Yuri & Di Zio, Simone & Pilla, Francesco & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2024. "Spatial participatory planning for urban logistics: A GIS-enhanced Real-Time Spatial Delphi approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Ahmad Alkharabsheh & Sarbast Moslem & Laila Oubahman & Szabolcs Duleba, 2021. "An Integrated Approach of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Grey Theory for Evaluating Urban Public Transportation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Sören Lauenstein & Christoph Schank, 2022. "Design of a Sustainable Last Mile in Urban Logistics—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Marialisa Nigro & Sergio Maria Patella & Simone Serafini, 2018. "Public Transport-Based Crowdshipping for Sustainable City Logistics: Assessing Economic and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Marta Viu-Roig & Eduard J. Alvarez-Palau, 2020. "The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Andrii Galkin & Tibor Schlosser & Ivan Cardenas & Dominika Hodakova & Silvia Capayova, 2021. "Freight Demand and Supply Assessment for Implementation of Crowdsourcing Technology: A Case Study in Bratislava, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Reza Banai, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    15. Juan Guillermo Urzúa-Morales & Juan Pedro Sepulveda-Rojas & Miguel Alfaro & Guillermo Fuertes & Rodrigo Ternero & Manuel Vargas, 2020. "Logistic Modeling of the Last Mile: Case Study Santiago, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    17. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    20. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:135-:d:1756422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.