IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1133-d485018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSR Reporting of Stakeholders’ Health: Proposal for a New Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ehsanul Huda Chowdhury

    (Department of Business Studies and Economics, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Brita Backlund Rambaree

    (Department of Social Work and Criminology, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Gloria Macassa

    (Department of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden
    Epidemiology Unit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, University of Porto, 4050 600 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the paper is to identify and categorize disclosures from the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards) that have direct or indirect influence on health of external or internal stakeholders. Methodology: GRI core and comprehensive disclosures (as part of universal standards and topic-specific standards related to economic, environmental and social topics) that can be used by businesses for CSR reporting were grouped as to have direct or indirect influence on external and internal stakeholders’ health. Findings: The study proposes a systematic way of conceiving GRI standards in terms of direct or indirect influence on the health and well-being of internal and external stakeholders. Originality/Value: This is the first study that provides a classification of core and comprehensive GRI disclosures that have direct or indirect influence on the health of external or internal stakeholders. This classification will allow businesses to easily report those CSR activities that might be of importance to stakeholders’ health promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehsanul Huda Chowdhury & Brita Backlund Rambaree & Gloria Macassa, 2021. "CSR Reporting of Stakeholders’ Health: Proposal for a New Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1133-:d:485018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Codruţa Dura, 2014. "Occupational health and safety integration in corporate social responsibility policies within B.R.D. - G.S.G. Romania," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 59-70.
    2. Hopkins, Michael,, 2004. "Corporate social responsibility : an issues paper," ILO Working Papers 993709523402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Michelon, Giovanna & Pilonato, Silvia & Ricceri, Federica, 2015. "CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 59-78.
    4. repec:ilo:ilowps:370952 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kindig, D.A. & Stoddart, G., 2003. "What is population health?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(3), pages 380-383.
    6. Zhihong Wang & Tien‐Shih Hsieh & Joseph Sarkis, 2018. "CSR Performance and the Readability of CSR Reports: Too Good to be True?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 66-79, January.
    7. Habib‐Uz‐Zaman Khan & Abdel K. Halabi & Martin Samy, 2009. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: a study of selected banking companies in Bangladesh," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 344-357, July.
    8. Deborah E. Rupp & Ruodan Shao & Daniel P. Skarlicki & E. Layne Paddock & Tae-Yeol Kim & Thierry Nadisic, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Engagement : The Moderating Role of CSR-Specific Relative Autonomy and Individualism," Post-Print hal-02312131, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gloria Macassa & Mamunur Rashid & Brita Backlund Rambaree & Ehsanul Huda Chowdhury, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting for Stakeholders’ Health and Wellbeing in the Food and Beverage Industry: A Case Study of a Multinational Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Claudiu George Bocean & Michael Marian Nicolescu & Marian Cazacu & Simona Dumitriu, 2022. "The Role of Social Responsibility and Ethics in Employees’ Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Maya Novitasari & Anggita Langgeng Wijaya & Nindya Mariana Agustin & Ardi Gunardi & Leo‐Paul Dana, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Green supply chain management as a mediating variable," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 267-276, January.
    4. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karaman, Abdullah S. & Orazalin, Nurlan & Uyar, Ali & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2021. "CSR achievement, reporting, and assurance in the energy sector: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Silvia Ruiz-Blanco & Silvia Romero & Belen Fernandez-Feijoo, 2022. "Green, blue or black, but washing–What company characteristics determine greenwashing?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4024-4045, March.
    3. Víctor Amor‐Esteban & María Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Bias in composite indexes of CSR practice: An analysis of CUR matrix decomposition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1914-1936, July.
    4. Hyejoon Rim & Jisu Kim & Chuqing Dong, 2019. "A cross‐national comparison of transparency signaling in corporate social responsibility reporting: The United States, South Korea, and China cases," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1517-1529, November.
    5. Shuolei Xu & Fangjun Wang & Charles P. Cullinan & Nanyan Dong, 2022. "Corporate Tax Avoidance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Readability: Evidence from China," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 267-289, June.
    6. Simone Pizzi & Francesco Rosati & Andrea Venturelli, 2021. "The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 404-421, January.
    7. Kerstin Lopatta & Thomas Kaspereit & Sebastian A. Tideman & Anna R. Rudolf, 2022. "The moderating role of CEO sustainability reporting style in the relationship between sustainability performance, sustainability reporting, and cost of equity," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 429-465, April.
    8. Muhammad Farrukh & Muhammad Sajid & Jason Wai Chow Lee & Imran Ahmed Shahzad, 2020. "The perception of corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Examining the underlying mechanism," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 760-768, March.
    9. Adriana Barbeito‐Caamaño & Ricardo Chalmeta, 2020. "Using big data to evaluate corporate social responsibility and sustainable development practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2831-2848, November.
    10. Shaozhen Han & Guoming Li & Michel Lubrano & Zhou Xun, 2020. "Lie of the Weak: Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Activities of Chinese Zombie Firms," AMSE Working Papers 2001, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    11. Karen Minyard & Tina A. Smith & Richard Turner & Bobby Milstein & Lori Solomon, 2018. "Community and programmatic factors influencing effective use of system dynamic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 154-171, January.
    12. Lu Zhang & Yuan George Shan & Millicent Chang, 2021. "Can CSR Disclosure Protect Firm Reputation During Financial Restatements?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 157-184, September.
    13. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    14. Simone Pizzi, 2018. "The Relationship between Non-financial Reporting, Environmental Strategies and Financial Performance. Empirical Evidence from Milano Stock Exchange," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-9, November.
    15. Amrou Awaysheh & Randall A. Heron & Tod Perry & Jared I. Wilson, 2020. "On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 965-987, June.
    16. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    17. Engy Mohsen El Hawary & Iman Mamdouh Arafa, 2018. "Studying the Effect of Stakeholders on the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility by Banks: Evidence from Egypt," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(4), pages 200-200, November.
    18. Helfaya, Akrum & Aboud, Ahmed & Amin, Essam, 2023. "An examination of corporate environmental goals disclosure, sustainability performance and firm value – An Egyptian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    19. Ali Uyar & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Do shareholders reward or punish risky firms due to CSR reporting and assurance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1596-1620, July.
    20. Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Valentina Minutiello & Arcangelo Marrone & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Readability of integrated reports: Evidence from worldwide adopters," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 524-534, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1133-:d:485018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.