IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13473-d695902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impacts Related to Closed Mines in Inner Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Honglei Liu

    (School of Geosciences & Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
    North China Engineering Investigation Institute Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050021, China)

  • Qiang Wu

    (School of Geosciences & Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center of Coal Mine Water Hazard Controlling, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jianxin Chen

    (Geological Environment Monitoring Institute of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010020, China)

  • Mingjun Wang

    (Geological Environment Monitoring Institute of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010020, China)

  • Di Zhao

    (School of Geosciences & Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Cheng Duan

    (Geological Environment Monitoring Institute of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010020, China)

Abstract

Mining activities, while promoting social and economic development, alter the environments and ecosystems of mining areas. Some of the alterations have negative impacts on the environment, while some have positive impacts. By understanding the positive and negative impacts related to closed mines in Inner Mongolia, this research aims to seek advantages of the positive impacts on the environment and reduce the harm of the negative impacts, extending the mining value chain. The paper reviewed four main negative environmental impacts (NEIs) of closed mines and proposed four positive environmental impacts (PEIs) which include ecosystem services, cultural services, land resources and underground space resources, and energy sources and mineral resources. The paper focused on the environmental problems and the PEI utilization of closed mines in Inner Mongolia with 20 representative cases. It carefully studied the Minda Mine which is a good example to combine several PEI utilization objectives. Multiple PEI objectives, as well as the correlations among different objectives, can benefit closed mines ecologically, economically, and socially. In addition, a three-step framework for closed mine revitalization and the factors affecting the compound PEI objectives are mentioned in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Honglei Liu & Qiang Wu & Jianxin Chen & Mingjun Wang & Di Zhao & Cheng Duan, 2021. "Environmental Impacts Related to Closed Mines in Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13473-:d:695902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaohua Song & Caiping Zhao & Jingjing Han & Qi Zhang & Jinpeng Liu & Yuanying Chi, 2020. "Measurement and Influencing Factors Research of the Energy and Power Efficiency in China: Based on the Supply-Side Structural Reform Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Sonja Kivinen, 2017. "Sustainable Post-Mining Land Use: Are Closed Metal Mines Abandoned or Re-Used Space?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Juliana Segura-Salazar & Luís Marcelo Tavares, 2018. "Sustainability in the Minerals Industry: Seeking a Consensus on Its Meaning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-38, May.
    4. Dai, Hancheng & Xie, Xuxuan & Xie, Yang & Liu, Jian & Masui, Toshihiko, 2016. "Green growth: The economic impacts of large-scale renewable energy development in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 435-449.
    5. Jiu Huang & Chuyuan Tian & Longfei Xing & Zhengfu Bian & Xiexing Miao, 2017. "Green and Sustainable Mining: Underground Coal Mine Fully Mechanized Solid Dense Stowing-Mining Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Khan, Shahbaz & Mushtaq, Shahbaz & Hanjra, Munir A. & Schaeffer, Jürgen, 2008. "Estimating potential costs and gains from an aquifer storage and recovery program in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 477-488, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yichun Xie & Chao Liu & Shujuan Chang & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Urban Sustainability: Integrating Socioeconomic and Environmental Data for Multi-Objective Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Marwan Al Heib & Christian Franck & Hippolyte Djizanne & Marie Degas, 2023. "Post-Mining Multi-Hazard Assessment for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Saidi Kais & Ben Mbarek Mounir, 2017. "Causal interactions between environmental degradation, renewable energy, nuclear energy and real GDP: a dynamic panel data approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 51-67, March.
    3. Zhang, Xi & Geng, Yong & Shao, Shuai & Wilson, Jeffrey & Song, Xiaoqian & You, Wei, 2020. "China’s non-fossil energy development and its 2030 CO2 reduction targets: The role of urbanization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    4. Marat M. Khayrutdinov & Vladimir I. Golik & Alexander V. Aleksakhin & Ekaterina V. Trushina & Natalia V. Lazareva & Yulia V. Aleksakhina, 2022. "Proposal of an Algorithm for Choice of a Development System for Operational and Environmental Safety in Mining," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Katarzyna Pactwa & Justyna Woźniak & Michał Dudek, 2020. "Sustainable Social and Environmental Evaluation of Post-Industrial Facilities in a Closed Loop Perspective in Coal-Mining Areas in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Yang Yu & Shen-En Chen & Ka-Zhong Deng & Peng Wang & Hong-Dong Fan, 2018. "Subsidence Mechanism and Stability Assessment Methods for Partial Extraction Mines for Sustainable Development of Mining Cities—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Cui, Qi & He, Ling & Han, Guoyi & Chen, Hao & Cao, Juanjuan, 2020. "Review on climate and water resource implications of reducing renewable power curtailment in China: A nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    8. Francisco García-Lillo & Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa, 2023. "Renewable Energies and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Deyu Qian & Nong Zhang & Dongjiang Pan & Zhengzheng Xie & Hideki Shimada & Yang Wang & Chenghao Zhang & Nianchao Zhang, 2017. "Stability of Deep Underground Openings through Large Fault Zones in Argillaceous Rock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    10. Li, Wei & Jia, Zhijie, 2016. "The impact of emission trading scheme and the ratio of free quota: A dynamic recursive CGE model in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Ansari, Mohd Arshad, 2022. "Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Kashan, Alireza Javanmardi & Lay, Janine & Wiewiora, Anna & Bradley, Lisa, 2022. "The innovation process in mining: Integrating insights from innovation and change management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Gholami, M. & Barbaresi, A. & Torreggiani, D. & Tassinari, P., 2020. "Upscaling of spatial energy planning, phases, methods, and techniques: A systematic review through meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Abdulaziz Alqahtani & Tom Sale & Michael J. Ronayne & Courtney Hemenway, 2021. "Demonstration of Sustainable Development of Groundwater through Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(2), pages 429-445, January.
    16. Songyan Ren & Peng Wang & Zewei Lin & Daiqing Zhao, 2022. "The Policy Choice and Economic Assessment of High Emissions Industries to Achieve the Carbon Peak Target under Energy Shortage—A Case Study of Guangdong Province," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Nong, Duy & Nguyen, Duong Binh & Nguyen, Trung H. & Wang, Can & Siriwardana, Mahinda, 2020. "A stronger energy strategy for a new era of economic development in Vietnam: A quantitative assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. William Wills & Emilio Lebre La Rovere & Carolina Grottera & Giovanna Ferrazzo Naspolini & Gaëlle Le Treut & F. Ghersi & Julien Lefèvre & Carolina Burle Schmidt Dubeux, 2022. "Economic and social effectiveness of carbon pricing schemes to meet Brazilian NDC targets," Post-Print hal-03500923, HAL.
    19. Zhiyi Zhang & Hideki Shimada & Takashi Sasaoka & Akihiro Hamanaka, 2017. "Stability Control of Retained Goaf-Side Gateroad under Different Roof Conditions in Deep Underground Y Type Longwall Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Jiskani, Izhar Mithal & Cai, Qingxiang & Zhou, Wei & Ali Shah, Syed Ahsan, 2021. "Green and climate-smart mining: A framework to analyze open-pit mines for cleaner mineral production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13473-:d:695902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.