IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12270-d673748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Source Seeds and the Revitalization of Local Knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Fredriksson

    (Department for Culture and Society, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

Abstract

This article engages with the resistance against the global erosion of seed diversity following the modernization and industrialization of agriculture over the 20th century. This resistance spans from local farming communities that preserve and safeguard traditional landraces to international movements which oppose proprietary seed regulations and promote free sharing of seeds. The article focuses on the latter and presents a study of the open source seed movement: an initiative to apply strategies from the open source software movement to ensure the free circulation of seeds. The erosion of seed diversity can be seen not only as a loss of genetic diversity but also a memory loss where traditional, collective knowledge about how to grow certain landraces is forgotten. Consequently, the open source seed movement is not only about saving seeds but also about preserving and revitalizing local and traditional ecological knowledge against privatization and enclosure through intellectual property rights. The aim of this article is, thus, to analyze the open source seed movement as an act of revitalization in relation to intellectual property rights and in the context of information politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Fredriksson, 2021. "Open Source Seeds and the Revitalization of Local Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12270-:d:673748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12270/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12270/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tarleton Gillespie, 2007. "Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262072823, December.
    2. Johanna Dahlin & Elin Svensson, 2021. "Revitalizing Traditional Agricultural Practices: Conscious Efforts to Create a More Satisfying Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Claire H. Luby & Irwin L. Goldman, 2016. "Improving Freedom to Operate in Carrot Breeding through the Development of Eight Open Source Composite Populations of Carrot ( Daucus carota L. var. sativus )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Johannes Kotschi & Bernd Horneburg, 2018. "The Open Source Seed Licence: A novel approach to safeguarding access to plant germplasm," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-7, October.
    5. Claire H Luby & Irwin L Goldman, 2016. "Freeing Crop Genetics through the Open Source Seed Initiative," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-6, April.
    6. Martin Fredriksson Almqvist, 2016. "Piracy and the Politics of Social Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire H Luby & Julie C Dawson & Irwin L Goldman, 2016. "Assessment and Accessibility of Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Carrot (Daucus carota L. var. sativus) Cultivars Commercially Available in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Olga Sezneva, 2013. "Re-thinking Copyright Through the Copy in Russia," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 472-487, November.
    3. Kathleen S. Micken & Scott D. Roberts & Jason D. Oliver, 2020. "The digital continuum: the influence of ownership, access, control, and Cocreation on digital offerings," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 98-115, June.
    4. Tiffany L. Fess & Vagner A. Benedito, 2018. "Organic versus Conventional Cropping Sustainability: A Comparative System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-42, January.
    5. Axel Gruvaeus & Johanna Dahlin, 2021. "Revitalization of Food in Sweden—A Closer Look at the REKO Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Peter K. Yu, 2018. "Customizing Fair Use Transplants," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Łukasz Tomczyk, 2021. "Evaluation of Digital Piracy by Youths," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Armelle Mazé & Aida Calabuig Domenech & Isabelle Goldringer, 2021. "Commoning the seeds: alternative models of collective action and open innovation within French peasant seed groups for recreating local knowledge commons," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 541-559, June.
    9. Stefanie Sievers-Glotzbach & Anja Christinck, 2021. "Introduction to the symposium: seed as a commons—exploring innovative concepts and practices of governing seed and varieties," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 499-507, June.
    10. Johannes Kotschi & Berthold Schrimpf & Ann Waters-Bayer & Bernd Horneburg, 2022. "Financing Organic Plant Breeding—New Economic Models for Seed as a Commons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Leslie Regan Shade & Tamara Shepherd, 2013. "Viewing youth and mobile privacy through a digital policy literacy framework," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59447, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. William Aspray & Philip Doty, 2023. "Does technology really outpace policy, and does it matter? A primer for technical experts and others," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 885-904, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12270-:d:673748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.