IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4729-d1660848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and Challenges Faced in the Deployment of Principles of the Circular Bioeconomy: Awareness, Knowledge and Practices Based on the Example of Polish Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Pink

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Barbara Kiełbasa

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Michał Niewiadomski

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Piecuch

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The circular bioeconomy is the key tool for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Changes in agricultural production are crucial to its development. Farmers are not only responsible for biomass production but also account for approximately 13% of GHG emissions in the EU. This article addresses the following questions: (Q1) To what extent are farmers implementing the values and practices of the circular bioeconomy? (Q2) Are agricultural advisors promoting these values and practices? (Q3) What are the potential barriers preventing farmers from transitioning to a circular bioeconomy? The study was conducted among two groups. A CATI questionnaire survey was conducted with farmers, and in-depth interviews with agricultural advisors. Most farmers do not apply circular bioeconomy principles in their production practices. However, cluster analysis revealed variation: in addition to the disinterested mainstream group, a cluster of relatively affluent farmers was identified as more engaged in circular practices. The analysis of agricultural advisors’ attitudes revealed an insufficient level of engagement in promoting circular bioeconomy practices. It also indicated significant variation in the advisors’ values and attitudes, which may affect the type and quality of information they pass on to farmers. The study identified several barriers to the implementation of circular bioeconomy solutions, stemming from both farmers’ attitudes and institutional conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Pink & Barbara Kiełbasa & Michał Niewiadomski & Katarzyna Piecuch, 2025. "Barriers and Challenges Faced in the Deployment of Principles of the Circular Bioeconomy: Awareness, Knowledge and Practices Based on the Example of Polish Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4729-:d:1660848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajwal Dsouza & Gordon W. Price & Mike Dixon & Thomas Graham, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Incorporation of Composting in Closed-Loop Urban Controlled Environment Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Ioana-Maria Toplicean & Adina-Daniela Datcu, 2024. "An Overview on Bioeconomy in Agricultural Sector, Biomass Production, Recycling Methods, and Circular Economy Considerations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Beate El-Chichakli & Joachim von Braun & Christine Lang & Daniel Barben & Jim Philp, 2016. "Policy: Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7611), pages 221-223, July.
    4. Véronique Chable & Edwin Nuijten & Ambrogio Costanzo & Isabelle Goldringer & Riccardo Bocci & Bernadette Oehen & Frédéric Rey & Dionysia Fasoula & Judit Feher & Marjo Keskitalo & Beate Koller & Michal, 2020. "Embedding Cultivated Diversity in Society for Agro-Ecological Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-34, January.
    5. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Anastasios Michailidis & Christos Karelakis & Yannis Fallas & Aikaterini Paltaki, 2023. "What Makes Farmers Aware in Adopting Circular Bioeconomy Practices? Evidence from a Greek Rural Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Anna Nowak & Anna Kobiałka & Artur Krukowski, 2021. "Significance of Agriculture for Bioeconomy in the Member States of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Johanna Dahlin & Elin Svensson, 2021. "Revitalizing Traditional Agricultural Practices: Conscious Efforts to Create a More Satisfying Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Marks-Bielska, Renata & Bilyj, Justyna, 2023. "Conditions for Introducing Innovation on Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).
    9. Efthymios Rodias & Eirini Aivazidou & Charisios Achillas & Dimitrios Aidonis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Water-Energy-Nutrients Synergies in the Agrifood Sector: A Circular Economy Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Hilary Ingham & &Mike Ingham, 2004. "How big is the problem of Polish agriculture?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 213-234.
    11. Jarka Chloupkova & Gunnar Svendsen & Gert Svendsen, 2003. "Building and destroying social capital: The case of cooperative movements in Denmark and Poland," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 20(3), pages 241-252, September.
    12. Pierre Labarthe & Monika Beck, 2022. "CAP and Advisory Services: From Farm Advisory Systems to Innovation Support," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(1), pages 5-14, April.
    13. Muratbek Baglan & Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Xue Zhou & Xianhui Geng, 2020. "Towards Cleaner Production: Certified Seed Adoption and Its Effect on Technical Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Mariana Niculescu & Maria Nache Cimpoeru & Oana Alexandra Călin, 2023. "Progress of EU Member States Regarding the Bioeconomy and Biomass Producing and Converting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Dimitrios Petropoulos & Georgios A. Deirmentzoglou & Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Bas Paris & Dimitris Michas & Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Elena Athanasopoulou & Leonardo Nibbi & Hailong Li & Lara Carval, 2025. "Digital and Entrepreneurial Competencies for the Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Training Needs of Agricultural Professionals in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Sweden," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Wouter Groot & Haranath Tadepally, 2008. "Community action for environmental restoration: a case study on collective social capital in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 519-536, August.
    4. Jones, R.E. & Speight, R.E. & Blinco, J.L. & O'Hara, I.M., 2022. "Biorefining within food loss and waste frameworks: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2025. "Navigating the Bioeconomy: Using Delphi-SWOT to Build Robust Strategies for Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Põllumäe, Priit & Lilleleht, Ando & Korjus, Henn, 2016. "Institutional barriers in forest owners' cooperation: The case of Estonia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 9-16.
    7. Grzegorz Tchorek & Michał Brzozowski & Katarzyna Dziewanowska & Agnieszka Allen & Waldemar Kozioł & Michał Kurtyka & Filip Targowski, 2020. "Social Capital and Value Co-Creation: The Case of a Polish Car Sharing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    8. H Ingham & M Ingham & J Herbst, 2008. "Why do Local Unemployment Rates in Poland Vary so Much?," Working Papers 594943, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    9. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    10. J Herbst & H Ingham & M Ingham, 2005. "Local unemployment in Poland," Working Papers 566803, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    11. Urszula Markowska-Przybyła & David M. Ramsey, 2018. "Social Capital and Long-Term Regional Development within Poland in the Light of Experimental Economics and Data from a Questionnaire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Benoit Mougenot & Jean-Pierre Doussoulin, 2022. "Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1031-1047, January.
    13. Atif Maqbool Khan & Magdalena Osińska, 2022. "Energy Consumption under Circular Economy Conditions in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Xuezhou Wen & Daniel Quacoe & Dinah Quacoe & Kingsley Appiah & Bertha Ada Danso, 2019. "Analysis on Bioeconomy’s Contribution to GDP: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    16. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Angeliki Foutri & George Martinidis & Theodora Kalea & Yannis Fallas, 2025. "Developing Blueprints for Robust Regional Bioeconomy Strategies: The Case of Western Macedonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Furmankiewicz, Marek & Hewitt, Richard J. & Kazak, Jan K., 2021. "Can rural stakeholders drive the low-carbon transition? Analysis of climate-related activities planned in local development strategies in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    18. Zeug, Walther & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    19. Panhwar Ghulam Mustafa & Shangao Wang & Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Yi Yu & Zhou Li, 2024. "The effect of climate-smart agriculture on productivity and cost efficiency: Insights from smallholder wheat producers in Pakistan," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(7), pages 334-348.
    20. Isabel Saz-Gil & Ignacio Bretos & Millán Díaz-Foncea, 2021. "Cooperatives and Social Capital: A Narrative Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4729-:d:1660848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.