IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12210-d672767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Sustainable Risks Mitigation Strategies Using a Morphological Analysis-Based Approach: A Real Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Manel Elmsalmi

    (OLID Research Unit, Higher Institute of Industrial Management Sfax, University of Sfax, Technopolis of Sfax 3021, Tunisia)

  • Wafik Hachicha

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Awad M. Aljuaid

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The supply chain risk management (SCRM) is very critical to strategically support the firms to continuous success. There are, at least, three basic steps in this SCRM process: risk identification, risk evaluation, and risk mitigation (treatment). Whatever happens, the main step is risk mitigation (RM) and mainly sustainable RM. In fact, every risk must be eliminated or controlled as much as possible. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate and evaluate various RM scenarios from an initial risk identification and prioritization solution. The proposed scenario modeling technique is based on morphological analysis (MA) as an explorative scenario tool for RM. MA is used to develop a framework to proactively assess critical risk variables. Firstly, MA is employed to exhaustively create possible RM scenarios and, secondly, to assess the likelihood of each scenario. The proposed approach addresses the need for a basic rubric to help identify and choose RM approaches. A real case study is provided from the food industry to illustrate the application of the proposed approach. To handle all possible MA strategies, a dedicated MORPHOL software package is used. In addition, RM strategies are selected based on sustainability indicators. The case study results prove that MA has a considerable value for SCRM. It shows that firms can adopt multiple robust strategies in the form of a scenario describing all stages of SCRM in an integrated representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Manel Elmsalmi & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid, 2021. "Modeling Sustainable Risks Mitigation Strategies Using a Morphological Analysis-Based Approach: A Real Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12210-:d:672767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faisal Aqlan & Sarah S. Lam, 2015. "Supply chain risk modelling and mitigation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5640-5656, September.
    2. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Mateusz Tomanek, 2020. "Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Zhenfeng Liu & Jian Feng & Jinfeng Wang, 2020. "Resource-Constrained Innovation Method for Sustainability: Application of Morphological Analysis and TRIZ Inventive Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Amulya Gurtu & Jestin Johny, 2021. "Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Rajagopal, 2012. "Decision Making," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Darwinian Fitness in the Global Marketplace, chapter 7, pages 191-224, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Johansen, Iver, 2018. "Scenario modelling with morphological analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 116-125.
    7. Maria Nordström & Albin Engholm, 2021. "The complexity of value of travel time for self-driving vehicles – a morphological analysis," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 400-417, May.
    8. Qing Zhang & Weiguo Fan & Jianchang Lu & Siqian Wu & Xuechao Wang, 2021. "Research on Dynamic Analysis and Mitigation Strategies of Supply Chains under Different Disruption Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, February.
    9. Wafik Hachicha & Manel Elmsalmi, 2014. "An integrated approach based-structural modeling for risk prioritization in supply network management," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(10), pages 1301-1324, November.
    10. Frank Krysiak, 2009. "Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 483-492, April.
    11. Chih-Hung Hsu & An-Yuan Chang & Ting-Yi Zhang & Wei-Da Lin & Wan-Ling Liu, 2021. "Deploying Resilience Enablers to Mitigate Risks in Sustainable Fashion Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Sonia Irshad Mari & Young Hae Lee & Muhammad Saad Memon, 2016. "Sustainable and Resilient Garment Supply Chain Network Design with Fuzzy Multi-Objectives under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Manel Elmsalmi & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid, 2021. "Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manel Elmsalmi & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid, 2021. "Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Chih-Hung Hsu & Ming-Ge Li & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Shu-Zhen Shangguan & Wan-Ling Liu, 2022. "Deploying Big Data Enablers to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience to Mitigate Sustainable Risks Based on Integrated HOQ-MCDM Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-35, April.
    3. Fahim ul Amin & Qian-Li Dong & Katarzyna Grzybowska & Zahid Ahmed & Bo-Rui Yan, 2022. "A Novel Fuzzy-Based VIKOR–CRITIC Soft Computing Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.
    5. Kuang-Sheng Liu & Ming-Hung Lin, 2021. "Performance Assessment on the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Construction Material Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Apri Wahyudi & John K. M. Kuwornu & Endro Gunawan & Avishek Datta & Loc T. Nguyen, 2019. "Factors Influencing the Frequency of Consumers’ Purchases of Locally-Produced Rice in Indonesia: A Poisson Regression Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    8. Adams, Leen & Faseur, Tineke & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "The Influence of the Self-Regulatory Focus on the Effectiveness of Stop-Smoking Campaigns for Young Smokers," Working Papers 2010/38, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    9. Yiming Zhuang & Meltem Denizel & Frank Montabon, 2023. "Examining Firms’ Sustainability Frontier: Efficiency in Reaching the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    11. Haiyun, Cui & Zhixiong, Huang & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Ehsan Shekarian & Behrang Ijadi & Amirreza Zare & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    13. Matteo De Marchi & Fanny Friedrich & Michael Riedl & Hartmut Zadek & Erwin Rauch, 2023. "Development of a Resilience Assessment Model for Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem & Tanya Rosenblat, 2018. "Are Risk Attitudes Fixed Factors or Fleeting Feelings?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 127-149, June.
    15. Luis Francisco López-Castro & Elyn L. Solano-Charris, 2021. "Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Criteria in the Supply Chain Network Design. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle & Stefan Vögele & Wolfgang Hauser & Hannah Kosow & Witold-Roger Poganietz & Sigrid Prehofer, 2020. "Socio-technical energy scenarios: state-of-the-art and CIB-based approaches," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1723-1741, October.
    17. Reza Kiani Mavi & Denise Gengatharen & Neda Kiani Mavi & Richard Hughes & Alistair Campbell & Ross Yates, 2021. "Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Xin Zhang & Gang Zhao & Yingxiu Qi & Botang Li, 2019. "A Robust Fuzzy Optimization Model for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks Considering Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Ali, Syed Mithun & Rahman, Md. Hafizur & Tumpa, Tasmia Jannat & Moghul Rifat, Abid Ali & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar, 2018. "Examining price and service competition among retailers in a supply chain under potential demand disruption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 40-47.
    20. André Luiz Romano & Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira & Sandra Sofia F. S. Caeiro, 2021. "Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12210-:d:672767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.