IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v218y2025ics0040162525002252.html

Projections of Earth’s technosphere: Scenario modeling, worldbuilding, and overview of remotely detectable technosignatures

Author

Listed:
  • Haqq-Misra, Jacob
  • Profitiliotis, George
  • Kopparapu, Ravi

Abstract

This study uses methods from futures studies to develop a set of ten self-consistent scenarios for Earth’s 1000-year future, which can serve as examples for defining technosignature search strategies. We apply a novel worldbuilding pipeline that evaluates the dimensions of human needs in each scenario as a basis for defining the observable properties of the technosphere. Our scenarios include three with zero-growth stability, two that have collapsed into a stable state, one that oscillates between growth and collapse, and four that continue to grow. Only one scenario includes rapid growth that could lead to interstellar expansion. We examine absorption spectral features for a few scenarios to illustrate that nitrogen dioxide can serve as a technosignature to distinguish between present-day Earth, pre-agricultural Earth, and an industrial 1000-year future Earth. Three of our scenarios are spectrally indistinguishable from pre-agricultural Earth, even though these scenarios include expansive technospheres. Up to nine of these scenarios could represent steady-state examples that could persist for much longer timescales, and it remains possible that short-duration technospheres could be the most abundant. Our scenario set provides the basis for further systematic thinking about technosignature detection as well as for imagining a broad range of possibilities for Earth’s future.

Suggested Citation

  • Haqq-Misra, Jacob & Profitiliotis, George & Kopparapu, Ravi, 2025. "Projections of Earth’s technosphere: Scenario modeling, worldbuilding, and overview of remotely detectable technosignatures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:218:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525002252
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525002252
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigo Cardoso & Ali Sobhani & Evert Meijers, 2022. "The cities we need: Towards an urbanism guided by human needs satisfaction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(13), pages 2638-2659, October.
    2. repec:sae:envval:v:23:y:2014:i:1:p:29-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Oded Berger-Tal & Jonathan Nathan & Ehud Meron & David Saltz, 2014. "The Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma: A Multidisciplinary Framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-8, April.
    4. Johansen, Iver, 2018. "Scenario modelling with morphological analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 116-125.
    5. Voros, Joseph, 2018. "On a morphology of contact scenario space," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 126-137.
    6. Michael F. Sterzik & Stefano Bagnulo & Enric Palle, 2012. "Biosignatures as revealed by spectropolarimetry of Earthshine," Nature, Nature, vol. 483(7387), pages 64-66, March.
    7. Matthew J. Spaniol & Nicholas J. Rowland, 2023. "AI‐assisted scenario generation for strategic planning," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seeve, Teemu & Vilkkumaa, Eeva & Morton, Alec, 2025. "A structured framework for supporting the participatory development of consensual scenario narratives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(2), pages 540-558.
    2. Lazebnik, Teddy & Spiegel, Orr, 2025. "Individual variation affects outbreak magnitude and predictability in multi-pathogen model of pigeons visiting dairy farms," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    3. Mengmi Zhang & Marcelo Armendariz & Will Xiao & Olivia Rose & Katarina Bendtz & Margaret Livingstone & Carlos Ponce & Gabriel Kreiman, 2022. "Look twice: A generalist computational model predicts return fixations across tasks and species," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-38, November.
    4. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    5. Lazebnik, Teddy & Aviv-Reuven, Shir & Rosenfeld, Ariel, 2025. "Publishing instincts: An exploration-exploitation framework for studying academic publishing behavior and “Home Venues”," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    6. Jingheng Wang & Meichen Fu & Xiangxue Han & Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen, 2025. "Research on Human Needs and the Valorization of Supply–Need Relationships in Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Southwest Karst Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Louwrens Botha & Oana Druta & Pieter van Wesemael, 2025. "Prefiguring the Caring City: Everyday Practices and Postcapitalist Possibility in Neighborhood Living Rooms," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    8. Elina Hiltunen & Aki‐Mauri Huhtinen, 2024. "Science fiction in military planning—Case allied command transformation and visions of warfare 2036," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), September.
    9. Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle & Stefan Vögele & Wolfgang Hauser & Hannah Kosow & Witold-Roger Poganietz & Sigrid Prehofer, 2020. "Socio-technical energy scenarios: state-of-the-art and CIB-based approaches," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1723-1741, October.
    10. Culot, Giovanna & Battistella, Cinzia, 2024. "Future ecosystem business model tool: Design science and field test in the efuel ecosystem towards the sustainability transition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    11. Serge Svizzero, 2016. "Foraging Wild Resources and Sustainable Economic Development," Post-Print hal-02146473, HAL.
    12. Panula-Ontto, Juha, 2019. "The AXIOM approach for probabilistic and causal modeling with expert elicited inputs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 292-308.
    13. Darío Blanco-Fernández & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2023. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and group turnover," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1087-1128, December.
    14. Fanny Groundstroem, 2023. "Cross-border impacts of climate change affect the energy transition: Insights from the Finnish energy sector," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(11), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Luca Lalor & Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2024. "Reinforcement Learning in Non-Markov Market-Making," Papers 2410.14504, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    16. Uijin Jung & Jinseo Lee & Ji-Young Choi & Hyun Yim & Myoung-Jin Lee, 2023. "Future Service Robot Scenarios in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Péron, Guillaume, 2024. "Movement-based coexistence does not always require a functional trade-off," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 487(C).
    18. Leena Ilmola‐Sheppard & Phillip White, 2024. "Extreme uncertainty requires extreme resilience: Identifying the features of resilience in complex social systems faced with deep uncertainty," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), September.
    19. Rui Pedro Gonçalves & Matthew J. Spaniol & Nicholas J. Rowland & Niels Gorm Malý Rytter, 2025. "Reflections on Building an Artificial Intelligence Bot to Prepare Students to Engage in Strategic Conversations During Foresight Fieldwork," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), April.
    20. Guo, Liying & Wang, Yang & Li, Meiling, 2024. "Exploration, exploitation and funding success: Evidence from junior scientists supported by the Chinese Young Scientists Fund," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:218:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525002252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.