IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9726-d625189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncovering Social Sustainability in Housing Systems through the Lens of Institutional Capital: A Study of Two Housing Alliances in Vienna, Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Angeliki Paidakaki

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Science, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Richard Lang

    (Institute of Innovation Management, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria
    Department of Human Sciences, Bertha von Suttner Private University, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria)

Abstract

This paper analyzes social sustainability in the context of urban housing through the lens of institutional capital. It examines how civil society housing actors co-construct bottom-linked governance arrangements by interacting endogenously with peers and exogenously with institutional actors, such as public housing agencies and elected officials, in order to steer, as housing alliances, socially sustainable residential developments. The paper thus offers an answer to the following two research questions: (1) What are internal governance features that characterize such civil society housing alliances? (2) What are their strategies of interaction with institutional actors in order to promote social sustainability and thus counter exclusionary patterns in urban housing systems? Empirical evidences are drawn from two civil society housing alliances in Austria, ‘BAWO’ (a national alliance of homelessness NGOs) and the ‘Initiative Collaborative Building & Living’. During three research stays in Vienna between 2014 and 2020, data was collected through semi-structured interviews and focus groups with leaders and members of housing alliances, interviews with key institutional stakeholders and web research. By reflecting on the institutional and relational character of the two housing alliances and digging out their potential and limitations in promoting different elements of social sustainability, our paper concludes that social sustainability in housing systems can be realized when it is set as a societal ambition sufficiently politicized by major parties involved in housing systems (housing alliances, governmental authorities of all ideological backgrounds, large non-profit housing developers) that collectively guarantee housing affordability and socio-spatial equity for all.

Suggested Citation

  • Angeliki Paidakaki & Richard Lang, 2021. "Uncovering Social Sustainability in Housing Systems through the Lens of Institutional Capital: A Study of Two Housing Alliances in Vienna, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9726-:d:625189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9726/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9726/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Mullins & Tom Moore, 2018. "Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Richard Lang & Harald Stoeger, 2018. "The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: empirical evidence from Austria," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 35-54, January.
    3. Christiane Droste, 2015. "German co-housing: an opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development?," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 79-92, March.
    4. Anita Aigner, 2019. "Housing entry pathways of refugees in Vienna, a city of social housing," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 779-803, May.
    5. Richard Lang & Harald Stoeger, 2018. "The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: empirical evidence from Austria," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 35-54, January.
    6. Santiago Eizaguirre & Marc Parés, 2019. "Communities making social change from below. Social innovation and democratic leadership in two disenfranchised neighbourhoods in Barcelona," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 173-191, April.
    7. Constanza Parra, 2010. "Sustainability and multi-level governance of territories classified as protected areas in France: the Morvan regional park case," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 491-509.
    8. David Mullins & Tom Moore, 2018. "Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Michael Gibbert & Winfried Ruigrok & Barbara Wicki, 2008. "What passes as a rigorous case study?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1465-1474, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isye Susana Nurhasanah & Pieter Van den Broeck, 2022. "Towards a Sustainable Metamorphosis of a Small Island Tourism: Dynamizing Capacity Building, Alternating Governance Arrangements, and Emerging Political Bargaining Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bossuyt, Daniël & Salet, Willem & Majoor, Stan, 2018. "Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 524-533.
    2. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    3. Andrej PRÍVARA, 2020. "Asylum Seekers And Refugees In Austria: Public Policy And Attitudes," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 58-74, December.
    4. Piotr Lis & Zuzanna Rataj & Katarzyna Suszyńska, 2022. "Implementation Risk Factors of Collaborative Housing in Poland: The Case of ‘Nowe Żerniki’ in Wrocław," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Lepore, Dominique & Frontoni, Emanuele & Micozzi, Alessandra & Moccia, Sara & Romeo, Luca & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2023. "Uncovering the potential of innovation ecosystems in the healthcare sector after the COVID-19 crisis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-86.
    6. Camelia Ilie & Gaston Fornes & Guillermo Cardoza & Juan Carlos Mondragón Quintana, 2020. "Development of Business Schools in Emerging Markets: Learning through Adoption and Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Liu, Yipeng & Meyer, Klaus E., 2020. "Boundary spanners, HRM practices, and reverse knowledge transfer: The case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    8. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.
    9. Barmeyer, Christoph & Davoine, Eric, 2019. "Facilitating intercultural negotiated practices in joint ventures: The case of a French–German railway organization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-11.
    10. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    11. Jorge Coque & Pilar L. González-Torre, 2017. "Adapting Nonprofit Resources to New Social Demands: The Food Banks in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Gaston Fornes & Abel Monfort & Camelia Ilie & Chun Kwong (Tony) Koo & Guillermo Cardoza, 2019. "Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability in MBAs. Understanding the Motivations for the Incorporation of ERS in Less Traditional Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Rabetino, Rodrigo & Kohtamäki, Marko & Gebauer, Heiko, 2017. "Strategy map of servitization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 144-156.
    14. Cheng Mei Tung, 2018. "Vertical integration for smart manufacturing-The dynamic capability perspective," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 4(2), pages 70-78.
    15. Carland, Corinne & Goentzel, Jarrod & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2018. "Modeling the values of private sector agents in multi-echelon humanitarian supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 532-543.
    16. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    17. Anja Schulze & Stefano Brusoni, 2022. "How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem‐solving," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2447-2477, December.
    18. Lea Stadtler & Luk N. Wassenhove, 2023. "Between Intensity and Diversity: Leveraging the Role of Place in Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 773-791, May.
    19. Fanny Dellinger & Peter Huber, 2021. "The Impact of Welfare Benefits on the Location Choice of Refugees. Testing the Welfare Magnet Hypothesis," WIFO Working Papers 626, WIFO.
    20. Giovanna Centorrino & Guido Noto & Daniela Rupo, 2022. "Management control in inter-firm relationships: Opportunities and challenges of blockchain technology adoption," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 65-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9726-:d:625189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.