IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i11p574-d1505831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating Shared Lives: Territorialisation and Conviviality in an Urban Community Land Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Read

    (Faculty of Business and Law, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK)

  • Alison Hirst

    (Faculty of Business and Law, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK)

  • Alison Pooley

    (Suffolk Sustainability Institute, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK)

  • NezHapi-Delle Odeleye

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK)

Abstract

Urban Community Land Trusts (CLTs) have been acclaimed for their politically transformative potential: de-commodifying land and providing permanently affordable housing under community control. Few studies include CLT residents and this paper features two case studies to help fill the gap. St Clements in East London, UK, and Citizens House, Southeast London, both created by London CLT, collectively have 34 households living in them. Unlike more geographically focused CLTs, London CLT provides governance, knowledge, and skills to support people across London to build the affordable housing they campaign for. The selection criteria prioritised the needs of those failed by the existing housing market, who had long-standing connections to the borough, and contributed to community life. London CLT hoped residents would have a transformational impact on the neighbourhood, spreading the ethos of community control. Using the conceptualisations of territorialisation and conviviality, new knowledge has been produced about residents’ experience of negotiating shared lives. While residents are happy with their homes, and value the neighbourliness that comes from knowing others better, investing time and energy in more organised activity and decision making has been slow. The two spaces display both the affectivity and distancing associated with territorialisation and the ‘rubbing along’ and ambivalence of conviviality.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Read & Alison Hirst & Alison Pooley & NezHapi-Delle Odeleye, 2024. "Negotiating Shared Lives: Territorialisation and Conviviality in an Urban Community Land Trust," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:574-:d:1505831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/11/574/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/11/574/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Mullins & Tom Moore, 2018. "Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Paul Watt, 2016. "A nomadic war machine in the metropolis," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 297-320, April.
    3. David Mullins & Tom Moore, 2018. "Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Ash Amin, 2008. "Collective culture and urban public space," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angeliki Paidakaki & Richard Lang, 2021. "Uncovering Social Sustainability in Housing Systems through the Lens of Institutional Capital: A Study of Two Housing Alliances in Vienna, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Behr,Daniela Monika & Chen,Lixue & Goel,Ankita & Haider,Khondoker Tanveer & Sandeep Singh & Zaman,Asad, 2023. "Estimating House Prices in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies : A Big Data Approach," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10301, The World Bank.
    3. Bossuyt, Daniël & Salet, Willem & Majoor, Stan, 2018. "Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 524-533.
    4. Lucy Oates & Abhijit Datey & Andrew Sudmant & Ross Gillard & Andy Gouldson, 2024. "Community Participation in Urban Land and Housing Delivery: Evidence from Kerala (India) and Dar es Salaam (Tanzania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    6. Regan Koch & Alan Latham, 2013. "On the Hard Work of Domesticating a Public Space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(1), pages 6-21, January.
    7. Lise Mahieus & Eugene McCann, 2023. "“Hot+Noisy” Public Space: Conviviality, “Unapologetic Asianness,” and the Future of Vancouver’s Chinatown," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 77-88.
    8. Francesca Froy, 2023. "Learning from architectural theory about how cities work as complex and evolving spatial systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 495-510.
    9. Winifred Curran, 2022. "SAYING ‘YES’ TO WHAT?: YIMBY and Urban Redevelopment in Chicago," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 296-300, March.
    10. Carmela Cucuzzella & Morteza Hazbei & Sherif Goubran, 2021. "Activating Data through Eco-Didactic Design in the Public Realm: Enabling Sustainable Development in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    11. Jonathan Rokem & Laura Vaughan, 2018. "Segregation, mobility and encounters in Jerusalem: The role of public transport infrastructure in connecting the ‘divided city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3454-3473, November.
    12. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    13. Massimo Bricocoli & Benedetta Marani & Stefania Sabatinelli, 2022. "The Spaces of Social Services as Social Infrastructure: Insights From a Policy-Innovation Project in Milan," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 381-397.
    14. Qin Li & Shaomin Peng & Zonghao Chen & Han Du & Yijun Liu & Wenlong Li, 2024. "Resilience Evaluation and Renovation Strategies of Public Spaces in Old Communities from a Disaster-Adaptive Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Alena Coblence & Luděk Sýkora, 2022. "THE PERFORMATIVITY OF METROPOLIZATION: How Material‐Discursive Practices Institutionalize the Prague Metropolitan Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 502-521, July.
    16. repec:osf:socarx:a6gbm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Zhuolin An & Shangyi Zhou, 2022. "Trialectics of Spatiality: The Negotiation Process between Winter Swimmers and the Municipal Government of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Regan Koch, 2015. "Licensing, Popular Practices and Public Spaces: An Inquiry via the Geographies of Street Food Vending," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1231-1250, November.
    19. Xiujie Ma & Jing Xie & George Jennings, 2021. "Health, Identification and Pleasure: An Ethnographic Study on the Self-Management and Construction of Taijiquan Park Culture Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Mel Nowicki, 2021. "Is anyone home? Appropriating and re-narrativisating the post-criminalisation squatting scene in England and Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 838-855, June.
    21. Misagh Mottaghi & Mattias Kärrholm & Catharina Sternudd, 2020. "Blue-Green Solutions and Everyday Ethicalities: Affordances and Matters of Concern in Augustenborg, Malmö," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 132-142.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:574-:d:1505831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.