IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v50y2013i1p6-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Hard Work of Domesticating a Public Space

Author

Listed:
  • Regan Koch
  • Alan Latham

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of domestication as a way of attending to urban public spaces and the ways in which they come to be inhabited. It argues against the tendency in urban scholarship to use the term pejoratively and interchangeably with words like pacification or taming to express concerns relating to the corrosion of public life. Rather, the aim here is to develop domestication as a concept attentive to the processes by which people go about making a home in the city. Given the tremendous investment, enthusiasm and amount of policy directed towards urban development and regeneration over the past decade, it is argued that it is vital that urban scholarship continues to develop tools and concepts for offering fine-grained attention to the spaces that get produced by these interventions and to the social dynamics within them. These arguments are developed through a case study of the Prince of Wales Junction in London.

Suggested Citation

  • Regan Koch & Alan Latham, 2013. "On the Hard Work of Domesticating a Public Space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(1), pages 6-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:50:y:2013:i:1:p:6-21
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098012447001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098012447001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098012447001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ash Amin, 2008. "Collective culture and urban public space," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cameron McAuliffe, 2013. "Legal Walls and Professional Paths: The Mobilities of Graffiti Writers in Sydney," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(3), pages 518-537, February.
    2. Lise Mahieus & Eugene McCann, 2023. "“Hot+Noisy” Public Space: Conviviality, “Unapologetic Asianness,” and the Future of Vancouver’s Chinatown," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 77-88.
    3. Francesca Froy, 2023. "Learning from architectural theory about how cities work as complex and evolving spatial systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 495-510.
    4. Alison L. Bain & Julie A. Podmore, 2020. "Scavenging for LGBTQ2S Public Library Visibility on Vancouver’s Periphery," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(4), pages 601-615, September.
    5. Carmela Cucuzzella & Morteza Hazbei & Sherif Goubran, 2021. "Activating Data through Eco-Didactic Design in the Public Realm: Enabling Sustainable Development in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    6. Talja Blokland & Robert Vief & Daniela Krüger & Henrik Schultze, 2023. "Roots and routes in neighbourhoods. Length of residence, belonging and public familiarity in Berlin, Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1949-1967, August.
    7. Jonathan Rokem & Laura Vaughan, 2018. "Segregation, mobility and encounters in Jerusalem: The role of public transport infrastructure in connecting the ‘divided city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3454-3473, November.
    8. Eva Youkhana, 2015. "A Conceptual Shift in Studies of Belonging and the Politics of Belonging," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 10-24.
    9. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    10. Massimo Bricocoli & Benedetta Marani & Stefania Sabatinelli, 2022. "The Spaces of Social Services as Social Infrastructure: Insights From a Policy-Innovation Project in Milan," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 381-397.
    11. Alena Coblence & Luděk Sýkora, 2022. "THE PERFORMATIVITY OF METROPOLIZATION: How Material‐Discursive Practices Institutionalize the Prague Metropolitan Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 502-521, July.
    12. Zengwei Xu & Shanshan Miao, 2022. "Effect of Public Space on Collective Action for Rural Waste Management and the Mediating Effects of Social Capital," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Slade, Jason & Inch, Andy & Crookes, Lee, 2021. "Building infrastructures for inclusive regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Misagh Mottaghi & Mattias Kärrholm & Catharina Sternudd, 2020. "Blue-Green Solutions and Everyday Ethicalities: Affordances and Matters of Concern in Augustenborg, Malmö," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 132-142.
    15. Louise Sträuli & Wojciech Kębłowski, 2023. "‘The gates of paradise are open’: Contesting and producing publicness in the Brussels metro through fare evasion," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3126-3142, November.
    16. Naomi Smith & Peter Walters, 2018. "Desire lines and defensive architecture in modern urban environments," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2980-2995, October.
    17. Casper Laing Ebbensgaard, 2020. "Standardised difference: Challenging uniform lighting through standards and regulation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(9), pages 1957-1976, July.
    18. Lobodanova, Diana (Лободанова, Диана), 2015. "New Formats of Communication Platforms in Cities [Новые Форматы Коммуникационных Площадок В Городах]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 174-192.
    19. Luis Alfonso Escudero Gómez, 2021. "The Reconfiguration of Urban Public–Private Spaces in the Mall: False Security, Antidemocratization, and Apoliticalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Zhuolin An & Shangyi Zhou, 2022. "Trialectics of Spatiality: The Negotiation Process between Winter Swimmers and the Municipal Government of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:50:y:2013:i:1:p:6-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.