IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v39y2021i4p838-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is anyone home? Appropriating and re-narrativisating the post-criminalisation squatting scene in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Mel Nowicki

Abstract

This paper explores the political significance of narratives of home. Using the aftermath of the 2012 criminalisation of squatting in England and Wales as a case study, the paper traces the ways in which the concept of ‘home’ is deployed to both reinforce neoliberal ideals, and is utilised as a tool of resistance by squatters. This paper focuses on the ways in which particular narratives of home are utilised to shape and legitimise housing policy and legislation such as the criminalisation of squatting through moralising language that delegitimise anti-capitalist homes as ‘nonhomes’. Following this, the paper goes on to explore how tropes and aesthetics of squatting are appropriated, re-narrativised and commercialised by neoliberal stakeholders. The remainder of the paper focuses on the methods by which squatters and other housing activists, too, utilise re-narrativisation tactics. Firstly, I highlight instances in which squatters have subverted assumptions of squats as ‘non-homes’ in order to make themselves invisible, and thus safe, in the urban landscape. Secondly, I explore linguistic methods utilised by squatters as a means of disassociating themselves from negative connotations through re-framing elements of the practice as ‘occupation’. The paper concludes by calling for closer attention to be paid to the political potency of the homespace, and the ways in which narratives of home can be utilised in the pursuit of social justice and anti-capitalist housing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Mel Nowicki, 2021. "Is anyone home? Appropriating and re-narrativisating the post-criminalisation squatting scene in England and Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 838-855, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:838-855
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654420964835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654420964835
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654420964835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Scott, 2012. "Housing Conflicts in the Irish Countryside: Uses and Abuses of Postcolonial Narratives," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 91-114.
    2. Phil Hubbard, 2016. "Hipsters on Our High Streets: Consuming the Gentrification Frontier," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(3), pages 106-111, August.
    3. Fran Tonkiss, 2013. "Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 312-324, June.
    4. Paul Watt, 2016. "A nomadic war machine in the metropolis," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 297-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ross Beveridge & Philippe Koch, 2021. "Contesting austerity, de-centring the state: Anti-politics and the political horizon of the urban," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(3), pages 451-468, May.
    2. Viviana Asara, 2018. "Untangling the radical imaginaries of the Indignados' movement: Commons, autonomy and ecologism," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2018_04, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    3. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Winifred Curran, 2022. "SAYING ‘YES’ TO WHAT?: YIMBY and Urban Redevelopment in Chicago," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 296-300, March.
    5. Hanna Hilbrandt, 2019. "Everyday urbanism and the everyday state: Negotiating habitat in allotment gardens in Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 352-367, February.
    6. Alexander Nurse & Matthew Fulton, 2017. "Delivering strategic economic development in a time of urban austerity: European Union structural funds and the English city regions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 164-182, May.
    7. Robert Shaw, 2014. "Streetlighting in England and Wales: New Technologies and Uncertainty in the Assemblage of Streetlighting Infrastructure," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(9), pages 2228-2242, September.
    8. Ali Madanipour, 2018. "Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1093-1110, April.
    9. Raco, Mike & Ward, Callum & Brill, Frances & Sanderson, Danielle & Freire-Trigo, Sonia & Ferm, Jess & Hamiduddin, Iqbal & Livingstone, Nicola, 2022. "Towards a virtual statecraft: housing targets and the governance of urban housing markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114315, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Slade, Jason & Inch, Andy & Crookes, Lee, 2021. "Building infrastructures for inclusive regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Michael Janoschka & Fabiola Mota, 2021. "New municipalism in action or urban neoliberalisation reloaded? An analysis of governance change, stability and path dependence in Madrid (2015–2019)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2814-2830, October.
    12. Aleksandra Nowysz & Łukasz Mazur & Magdalena Daria Vaverková & Eugeniusz Koda & Jan Winkler, 2022. "Urban Agriculture as an Alternative Source of Food and Water Security in Today’s Sustainable Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Eve Bantman-Masum, 2020. "Unpacking commercial gentrification in central Paris," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3135-3150, November.
    14. Grimaldi, Didier & Fernandez, Vicenc & Carrasco, Carlos, 2019. "Heuristic for the localization of new shops based on business and social criteria," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 249-257.
    15. Iulian Barba Lata & Martijn Duineveld, 2019. "A harbour on land: De Ceuvel’s topologies of creative reuse," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1758-1774, November.
    16. Sophia Maalsen, 2022. "The hack: What it is and why it matters to urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 453-465, February.
    17. Joshua Akers, 2015. "Emerging market city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(9), pages 1842-1858, September.
    18. Nicole Gurran & Madeleine Pill & Sophia Maalsen, 2021. "Hidden homes? Uncovering Sydney’s informal housing market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1712-1731, June.
    19. Hang Kei Ho & Rowland Atkinson, 2018. "Looking for big ‘fry’: The motives and methods of middle-class international property investors," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 2040-2056, July.
    20. Herlin Chien & Keiko Hori & Osamu Saito, 2022. "Urban commons in the techno-economic paradigm shift: An information and communication technology-enabled climate-resilient solutions review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1389-1405, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:838-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.