IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9268-d616715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Pedestrian Flows: Agent-Based Simulations of Pedestrian Activity for Land Use Distributions in Urban Developments

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús López Baeza

    (Digital City Science, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • José Carpio-Pinedo

    (tGIS Research Group—Transport, Infrastructure and Territory, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Julia Sievert

    (Digital City Science, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • André Landwehr

    (Digital City Science, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Philipp Preuner

    (HafenCity Hamburg GmbH, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Katharina Borgmann

    (Digital City Science, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Maša Avakumović

    (Digital City Science, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Aleksandra Weissbach

    (Digital City Science, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Jürgen Bruns-Berentelg

    (HafenCity Hamburg GmbH, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Jörg Rainer Noennig

    (Digital City Science, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Pedestrian activity is a cornerstone for urban sustainability, with key implications for the environment, public health, social cohesion, and the local economy. Therefore, city planners, urban designers, and decision-makers require tools to predict pedestrian mobility and assess the walkability of existing or planned urban environments. For this purpose, diverse approaches have been used to analyze different inputs such as the street network configuration, density, land use mix, and the location of certain amenities. This paper focuses on the location of urban amenities as key elements for pedestrian flow prediction, and, therefore, for the success of public spaces in terms of the social life of city neighborhoods. Using agent-based modeling (ABM) and land use floor space data, this study builds a pedestrian flow model, which is applied to both existing and planned areas in the inner city of Hamburg, Germany. The pedestrian flows predicted in the planned area inform the ongoing design and planning process. The flows simulated in the existing area are compared against real-world pedestrian activity data for external validation to report the model accuracy. The results show that pedestrian flow intensity correlates to the density and diversity of amenities, among other KPIs. These correlations validate our approach and also quantify it with measurable indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús López Baeza & José Carpio-Pinedo & Julia Sievert & André Landwehr & Philipp Preuner & Katharina Borgmann & Maša Avakumović & Aleksandra Weissbach & Jürgen Bruns-Berentelg & Jörg Rainer Noennig, 2021. "Modeling Pedestrian Flows: Agent-Based Simulations of Pedestrian Activity for Land Use Distributions in Urban Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9268-:d:616715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel J. Graham & Stephen Glaister, 2003. "Spatial Variation in Road Pedestrian Casualties: The Role of Urban Scale, Density and Land-use Mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1591-1607, July.
    2. José Carpio-Pinedo & Manuel Benito-Moreno & Patxi J. Lamíquiz-Daudén, 2021. "Beyond land use mix, walkable trips. An approach based on parcel-level land use data and network analysis," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 23-30, January.
    3. Mathieu Bourgais & Patrick Taillandier & Laurent Vercouter & Carole Adam, 2018. "Emotion Modeling in Social Simulation: A Survey," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(2), pages 1-5.
    4. Sungduck Lee & Emily Talen, 2014. "Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 368-388, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandra Battisti & Maria Valese & Herbert Natta, 2022. "Indicators as Mediators for Environmental Decision Making: The Case Study of Alessandria," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Yunqiang Xue & Meng Zhong & Luowei Xue & Bing Zhang & Haokai Tu & Caifeng Tan & Qifang Kong & Hongzhi Guan, 2022. "Simulation Analysis of Bus Passenger Boarding and Alighting Behavior Based on Cellular Automata," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Duncan, Michael, 2023. "The influence of pedestrian plans on walk commuting in US municipalities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda & German A. Barrero & Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, 2022. "Towards an enriched framework of service evaluation for pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure: acknowledging the power of users’ perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 791-814, June.
    2. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Javier Velázquez & Javier Infante & Inmaculada Gómez & Ana Hernando & Derya Gülçin & Fernando Herráez & Víctor Rincón & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Walkability under Climate Pressure: Application to Three UNESCO World Heritage Cities in Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Pietrostefani, Elisabetta, 2019. "The economic effects of density: A synthesis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 93-107.
    5. Kim Dovey & Elek Pafka, 2020. "What is walkability? The urban DMA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 93-108, January.
    6. Francesca Abastante & Isabella M. Lami & Luigi La Riccia & Marika Gaballo, 2020. "Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Faisal AlShareef & Mohammed Aljoufie, 2020. "Identification of the Proper Criteria Set for Neighborhood Walkability Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Model: A Case Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Stefania Bandini & Francesca Gasparini, 2021. "Social and Active Inclusion of the Elderly in the City Through Affective Walkability," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 557-573, November.
    9. Yunes Almansoub & Ming Zhong & Asif Raza & Muhammad Safdar & Abdelghani Dahou & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Transportation Supply on Mixed Land-Use at the Parcel Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2018. "Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: the case of Oporto," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 23-41, January.
    11. Nathaniel Bell & Nadine Schuurman, 2010. "GIS and Injury Prevention and Control: History, Challenges, and Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Ayse Ozbil & Tugce Gurleyen & Demet Yesiltepe & Ezgi Zunbuloglu, 2019. "Comparative Associations of Street Network Design, Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Haiming Wang, 2023. "Walk Score, Environmental Quality and Walking in a Campus Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Shima Hamidi & Somayeh Moazzeni, 2019. "Examining the Relationship between Urban Design Qualities and Walking Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Dallas, TX," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Chi, Guangqing & Porter, Jeremy R. & Cosby, Arthur G. & Levinson, David, 2013. "The impact of gasoline price changes on traffic safety: a time geography explanation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Roei Yosifof & Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman, 2024. "Hybrid quantitative mesoscale analyses for simulating pedestrians’ visual perceptions: Comparison of three New York City streets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(1), pages 140-156, January.
    17. Zhang, Yingheng & Li, Haojie & Ren, Gang, 2022. "Quantifying the social impacts of the London Night Tube with a double/debiased machine learning based difference-in-differences approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 288-303.
    18. Todor Stojanovski, 2019. "Urban Form and Mobility Choices: Informing about Sustainable Travel Alternatives, Carbon Emissions and Energy Use from Transportation in Swedish Neighbourhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Dongkwan Lee & Jean-Michel Guldmann & Burkhard von Rabenau, 2018. "Interactions between the built and socio-economic environment and driver demographics: spatial econometric models of car crashes in the Columbus Metropolitan Area," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 17-37, January.
    20. Jones, Peter & Lucas, Karen, 2012. "The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 4-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9268-:d:616715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.