IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8131-d422883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Abastante

    (Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 20125 Turin, Italy)

  • Isabella M. Lami

    (Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 20125 Turin, Italy)

  • Luigi La Riccia

    (Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 20125 Turin, Italy)

  • Marika Gaballo

    (Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 20125 Turin, Italy)

Abstract

The urban planning and evaluation literature suggests that making a walkable city means creating a resilient and healthy city. In recent years, alternative mobility has been the subject of numerous studies, showing that the concept of urban walkability can be used as an additional support in planning resilient cities. Though researchers agree that walkability assessment has a positive impact on public space planning, it is still difficult to include the topic in planning strategies because of its novelty in the scientific debate. This paper will first review the literature on walkability assessment and then propose a multi-methodological assessment framework that fills the gaps in existing assessment methods. The multi-methodological assessment framework contributes to overcoming the idea that objective and subjective aspects are “not part of the same planning project.” Thanks to its combination of hard and soft methods, the assessment framework illustrated in this paper can consider physical and perceptual aspects simultaneously and represent them visually using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). It can thus provide easily readable results that can be applied in establishing guidelines for planning resilient cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Abastante & Isabella M. Lami & Luigi La Riccia & Marika Gaballo, 2020. "Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8131-:d:422883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boeing, Geoff, 2019. "The Morphology and Circuity of Walkable and Drivable Street Networks," SocArXiv edj2s, Center for Open Science.
    2. Dr. ANKUR BARUA, 2013. "Methods for Decision-Making in Survey Questionnaires Based on Likert Scale," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(1), pages 35-38, January.
    3. Shatu, Farjana & Yigitcanlar, Tan, 2018. "Development and validity of a virtual street walkability audit tool for pedestrian route choice analysis—SWATCH," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 148-160.
    4. Sungduck Lee & Emily Talen, 2014. "Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 368-388, May.
    5. Shannon H. Rogers & Kevin H. Gardner & Cynthia H. Carlson, 2013. "Social Capital and Walkability as Social Aspects of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-11, August.
    6. Daniel Feldmeyer & Daniela Wilden & Christian Kind & Theresa Kaiser & Rüdiger Goldschmidt & Christian Diller & Jörn Birkmann, 2019. "Indicators for Monitoring Urban Climate Change Resilience and Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Ankur Barua, 2013. "Methods for Decision-Making in Survey Questionnaires Based on Likert Scale," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(1), pages 35-38.
    8. Anna Porębska & Paola Rizzi & Satoshi Otsuki & Masahiro Shirotsuki, 2019. "Walkability and Resilience: A Qualitative Approach to Design for Risk Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Joachim Scheiner & Christian Holz-Rau, 2007. "Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 487-511, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seyed Mohammad Haghighi Fard & Naciye Doratli, 2022. "Evaluation of Resilience in Historic Urban Areas by Combining Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System and GIS, with Sustainability and Regeneration Approach: The Case Study of Tehran (IRAN)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Paweł Ziemba, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Stochastic Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Sustainable Development of Local Government and State Administration Units in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Alina Źróbek-Różańska & Marek Ogryzek & Anna Źróbek-Sokolnik, 2022. "Creating a Healthy Environment for Children: GIS Tools for Improving the Quality of the Social Welfare Management System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Grazia Brunetta & Alessandra Faggian & Ombretta Caldarice, 2021. "Bridging the Gap: The Measure of Urban Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-4, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda & German A. Barrero & Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, 2022. "Towards an enriched framework of service evaluation for pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure: acknowledging the power of users’ perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 791-814, June.
    2. Olawumi Dele Awolusi & Shirley Shamen Jayakody, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Employee's Retention: Evidence from the Food and Beverage Industry in the State of Qatar," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 39-58.
    3. Javier Esclapés & Almudena Gómez & Ana Ibañez, 2021. "Flow. A Socially Responsible 3D Printed One-Handed Recorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Nadeem Uz Zaman, Zainab Bibi, Sana Ur Rehman Sheikh, Abdul Raziq, 2020. "Manualizing Factor Analysis of Likert Scale Data," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 7(2), pages 56-67, October.
    5. Yat Yen & Pengjun Zhao & Muhammad T Sohail, 2021. "The morphology and circuity of walkable, bikeable, and drivable street networks in Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(1), pages 169-185, January.
    6. Rybaczewska, Maria & Sparks, Leigh & Sułkowski, Šukasz, 2020. "Consumers’ purchase decisions and employer image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Dalit Shach-Pinsly & Tamar Ganor, 2021. "A New Approach for Assessing Secure and Vulnerable Areas in Central Urban Neighborhoods Based on Social-Groups’ Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Ding, Chuan & Wang, Donggen & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Yi & Yang, Jiawen, 2017. "Exploring the influence of built environment on travel mode choice considering the mediating effects of car ownership and travel distance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 65-80.
    9. Pedro R. D. Bom & Aitor Goti, 2018. "Public Capital and the Labor Income Share," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Scheiner, Joachim & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2013. "A comprehensive study of life course, cohort, and period effects on changes in travel mode use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 167-181.
    11. Holz-Rau, Christian & Scheiner, Joachim, 2011. "Safety and travel time in cost-benefit analysis: A sensitivity analysis for North Rhine-Westphalia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 336-346, March.
    12. Scheiner, Joachim, 2010. "Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 679-690.
    13. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Zhou, Meng, 2018. "Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-374.
    14. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    15. Xinyu (Jason) Cao, 2009. "Disentangling the influence of neighborhood type and self-selection on driving behavior: an application of sample selection model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 207-222, March.
    16. Javier Velázquez & Javier Infante & Inmaculada Gómez & Ana Hernando & Derya Gülçin & Fernando Herráez & Víctor Rincón & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Walkability under Climate Pressure: Application to Three UNESCO World Heritage Cities in Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, April.
    17. Xinyu Cao & Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 2012. "The connections among accessibility, self- selection and walking behaviour: a case study of Northern California residents," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning, chapter 5, pages 73-95, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Bradley Bereitschaft, 2017. "Equity in Microscale Urban Design and Walkability: A Photographic Survey of Six Pittsburgh Streetscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Næss, Petter, 2012. "Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(2), pages 21-45.
    20. Aditjandra, Paulus Teguh & Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D., 2013. "The influence of neighbourhood design on travel behaviour: Empirical evidence from North East England," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 54-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8131-:d:422883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.